Hello Eddy,
Wednesday, July 20, 2005, 5:30:19 AM, you wrote:
EB> Hi!
EB> I'm receiving spams with the following subject line
EB> Subject: TRAMAD0OL, MER1DllA, \/ALUUM, XANA, L0RAAZEPAM,
EB> AMBllEN, ALPRAZZ0LAM, \/llGRA, CAALlS,
EB> LEVlTRRA
EB> Spamassassin does not give points to this spam.
You should look at
the wiki, there are a number of postings on this subject.
Loren
How do I enable
bayes the how do I have it learn from MS Exchange public folders where I will
dump SPAM and HAM?
> >> Use bayes autolearning so that you don't have to bother to much.
> >> Also setup some aliases like [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] where
> >> users
> >> can forward wrongly classified mail for you to reclassify. Don't try
> >> to use someone else's bayes db and don't use just your pe
I'm a little confused on what you are reporting here, but I *think* you are
saying:
aYou are using 2.64
bThe mail doesn't have a Subject line
cThe mail is spam
dThe subject isn't getting tagged with [spam].
eYou are using qmail
If that is right, I think the key may be the last
Use bayes autolearning so that you don't have to bother to much.
Also setup some aliases like [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] where users
can forward wrongly classified mail for you to reclassify. Don't try
to use someone else's bayes db and don't use just your personal email
sinc
Eddy Beliveau wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'm receiving spams with the following subject line
> Subject: TRAMAD0OL, MER1DllA, \/ALUUM, XANA, L0RAAZEPAM, AMBllEN,
> ALPRAZZ0LAM, \/llGRA, CAALlS, LEVlTRRA
>
> Spamassassin does not give points to this spam.
>
> Any rule to filter this
>
> Thanks,
> Eddy
Re-
On Wednesday 20 July 2005 06:30 am, Eddy Beliveau wrote:
> I'm receiving spams with the following subject line
> Subject: TRAMAD0OL, MER1DllA, \/ALUUM, XANA, L0RAAZEPAM, AMBllEN,
> ALPRAZZ0LAM, \/llGRA, CAALlS, LEVlTRRA
Here's what I've been using to catch these:
header __VALUUM S
SA 2.64 w/ qmail-scanner. Messages w/ no subject and no body are being
detected as spam (message header info is normal, some score as high as
9.1 (threshold @ 5)), but it's not being rejected, and the ones that
should be let through, albeit with a [SPAM] tag on the subject line, are
not being tagg
fyi -- we agreed that the submissions rsync for the rescoring mass-checks
would be open until the 27th, since Henry won't be able to look at
them until then anyway.
--j.
> If you view the Public Folder using Outlook just add the
> column "Changed
> By" using Field Chooser. That should be the person that copied it
> there.
Aye; thanks. They're gone now (sucked down every hour via IMAP), but the
next time it happens I'll use this.
johnS
John,
If you view the Public Folder using Outlook just add the column "Changed
By" using Field Chooser. That should be the person that copied it
there.
I hope that helps.
Kris
-Original Message-
From: Stewart, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2005 1:33 PM
To: '
I had to downgrade to 0.49 to make somethings work.
I have seen some people also did it, but,
why don't you try:
tcpdump udp and port 53
to know why is it failing
On Tue, 2005-07-19 at 18:20 -0700, email builder wrote:
> I have a new spamd instance I am trying to start up on a server that sits
>
Mostly OT, but I know some others on here are doing the same thing as I on
their Exchange systems (using public folders as repositories for sa-learn).
I've posted to an Exchange newsgroup, but thought it was worth throwing out
here to see if anyone has an idea.
We are running Exchange 5.5.
We ha
Matthew Schumacher wrote
>Anyone have any ideas on how to fix this?
>
>
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2037
Michael
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Just intalled a backup email server using last Toaster Bill Shupp' s script
version. Set it the same way I did for the main server and for testing
purpose just move one just domain to this new server.
All mail sent to this NEW Toaster is received, with sender and of course To:
, but empty, no
Andrea Bencini wrote:
I perform a dump of the Bayes database (sa-learn --dump data)
0.049 0 1 1114618731 7bc32206de
0.026 0 2 1114618851 b214d213fd
0.958 1 0 1114607858 ea2d4af4f7
0.026 0 2 1114618998 5bb6204bec
0.005
Matthew Schumacher wrote:
> List,
>
> I moved my SA bayes store into my postgres database because I was
> running into locking issues with the Berkeley DB.
>
> The database is up and running fine, but I noticed that that connections
> to the database are not persistent. As many of you know, post
Hello Andrea
Am Mittwoch, 20. Juli 2005 15:46 schrieb Andrea Bencini:
> I perform a dump of the Bayes database (sa-learn --dump data)
>
> 0.049 0 1 1114618731 7bc32206de
> 0.026 0 2 1114618851 b214d213fd
> 0.958 1 0 1114607858 ea2d4af4f7
> 0
Ramprasad A Padmanabhan wrote:
One problem with the above regex.. it will match "tablets" or "tabs" in an
un-obfuscated form.
I think that is ok in the subject.
subject with tablets even un obfuscated still deserves a score around 1
Depends what kind of tablet you're talking about.. If
List,
I moved my SA bayes store into my postgres database because I was
running into locking issues with the Berkeley DB.
The database is up and running fine, but I noticed that that connections
to the database are not persistent. As many of you know, postgres isn't
the fastest database during s
I had problems trying to use Net::DNS v0.52 with SA 3.0.4 on Solaris 9.
The process would die in the SPF plugin, on line 225 of SPF.pm:
($result, $comment) = $query->result();
Downgrading to v0.48 fixed the problem.
L
> -Original Message-
> From: Michele Neylon:: Blacknight.ie [mailto:[
I perform a dump of the Bayes database (sa-learn --dump data)
0.049 0 1 1114618731 7bc32206de
0.026 0 2 1114618851 b214d213fd
0.958 1 0 1114607858 ea2d4af4f7
0.026 0 2 1114618998 5bb6204bec
0.005 0 10 1114
Brian Ipsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote on 07/19/2005 04:53:29 PM:
> Hi,
>
> When trying to report spam manually using
>
> # spamassassin -r < (mailfile)
>
> I get an error like:
>
> razor2 report failed: No such file or directory Died at
> /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/Repo
Hi,
> > # spamassassin -r < (mailfile)
> >
> > I get an error like:
> >
> > razor2 report failed: No such file or directory Died at
> > /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/Reporter.pm
> > line 148, line 1.
> > 1 message(s) examined.
> > Insecure dependency in connect while runnin
Hi!
I'm receiving spams with the following subject line
Subject: TRAMAD0OL, MER1DllA, \/ALUUM, XANA, L0RAAZEPAM, AMBllEN, ALPRAZZ0LAM, \/llGRA, CAALlS,
LEVlTRRA
Spamassassin does not give points to this spam.
Any rule to filter this
Thanks,
Eddy
Hello,
Is this a new spamsign?
(EHLO aalma-a.serve.WR.tnp.net) programmed
by mail.mtk.nao.ac.jp (1.9[2
the word programmed and (1.9[2 ?
More header information
Received: from 60-240-125-223.tpgi.com.au (60-240-125-223.tpgi.com.au
[60.240.125.223])
by capella.taos-it.nl ([195.86.120.110])
Loren Wilton wrote on Tue, 19 Jul 2005 22:13:14 -0700:
> net.dns 0.51 is known to have various problems with SA
Hm, I'm not aware of any problems on our machines, I use URIDNSBL. I'd
check if the firewall is the problem.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet S
Loren Wilton wrote:
> net.dns 0.51 is known to have various problems with SA, most
> or all of which are fixed in version 52. Or 49, for that
> matter. I don't recall if this is one of them, but it might be worth
> the test to see.
Agreed.
I upgraded to .52 on one of our production machines to
29 matches
Mail list logo
