Re: ruleset for antidrug.cf

On Tue, 2005-07-19 at 21:34, Matt Kettler wrote: > Ramprasad A Padmanabhan wrote: > > Hi list, > >Our servers are frequently getting spam mails with taablets , or > > ta.blets in the subject. > > > > I run rules_du_jour regularly, I am surprised there is no ruleset for > > catching this kind

Re: DNS failing... why? (works fine on cmd line)

net.dns 0.51 is known to have various problems with SA, most or all of which are fixed in version 52. Or 49, for that matter. I don't recall if this is one of them, but it might be worth the test to see. Loren

DNS failing... why? (works fine on cmd line)

I have a new spamd instance I am trying to start up on a server that sits behind another firewall (linux) machine (which I *think* is irrelevant, but that's the only different thing from our other setups that work fine) that is somehow missing DNS connections: '

Re: HELP: Looking for mac mail server software

CommuniGate Pro is great; I used it for a number of years. The per-user licensing scheme is rather expensive, though. On 7/17/05, Jeffrey Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: try communigate prowww.stalker.comOn Jul 16, 2005, at 9:21 PM, Jonathan Nichols wrote: OS X uses Postfix by default (at least

SA report fails with Razor2 ?

Hi, When trying to report spam manually using # spamassassin -r < (mailfile) I get an error like: razor2 report failed: No such file or directory Died at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/Reporter.pm line 148, line 1. 1 message(s) examined. Insecure dependency in connect while

Re: Early Questions

Jay Lee wrote: Mark Williams wrote: I have just installed spamassassin v3.0.4 in a test environment (which is a mirror of the live environment) and have a number of questions, which I can not see within the manuals/support documentation. Firstly, this is my configuration: Server: Linux (RH9.0

Re: HELP: Looking for mac mail server software

Thanks all for the recommendations. I now have SA and postfix running on OS X. Considering my experience with OS X, and linux prior to this, I need to take a bow. . Anyone have a good procmailrc file? From the page that helped a bit: http://developer.apple.com/server/fighting_spam.html First

Re: [ot] OS comments (was Early Questions)

On Tuesday 19 July 2005 18:50, Jay Lee wrote: > Mark Williams wrote: > >Server: Linux (RH9.0), with spamassassin installed from > >spamassassin.org web site using "make" etc (not RPM's). This > >machine then runs both IMAP and POP3 for clients. MTA is sendmail > > Surely your not going live wit

Re: False positives "received from localhost"

Matt Kettler wrote: SA should ignore 127.0.0.1. However, you might want to double-check to see if your SA box resolves "localhost" as 127.0.0.1 or as some other IP. (I have seen boxes configured to do this...) There are also some older versions of NSCD that were vulnerable to a sort of revers

Re: Early Questions

Jay Lee wrote: Mark Williams wrote: I have just installed spamassassin v3.0.4 in a test environment (which is a mirror of the live environment) and have a number of questions, which I can not see within the manuals/support documentation. Firstly, this is my configuration: Server: Linux (RH9.0

Re: Early Questions

Mark Williams wrote: I have just installed spamassassin v3.0.4 in a test environment (which is a mirror of the live environment) and have a number of questions, which I can not see within the manuals/support documentation. Firstly, this is my configuration: Server: Linux (RH9.0), with spamassa

Re: ruleset for antidrug.cf

Ramprasad A Padmanabhan wrote: Hi list, Our servers are frequently getting spam mails with taablets , or ta.blets in the subject. I run rules_du_jour regularly, I am surprised there is no ruleset for catching this kind of subjects /\bta+\.?b(let)?s\b/ Has someone already a ruleset fo

Re: Early Questions

Mark Williams wrote: Hi All (just joined, so please be gentle;-) ), I have just installed spamassassin v3.0.4 in a test environment (which is a mirror of the live environment) and have a number of questions, which I can not see within the manuals/support documentation. Firstly, this is my confi

Re: False positives "received from localhost"

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've had a couple of these since upgrading to 3.0.4. Headers with NO IP address in it, just this: Received: from localhost by (our server) I assume that if it's not a bug on my end, some users and/or servers are sending out from 127.0.0.1, which in turn sets off: RCVD

RE: (OT) SURBL local-DNS sample file?

> Would SURBL.org people mind publishing a sample rsync file on > their pages? I've forwarded your request to the URIBL.com group as well. It has some problems in that neither SURBL or URIBL allows just anyone to rsync. You have to be allowed to do it. But a few know better then me, so I'll see

(OT) SURBL local-DNS sample file?

Hi, what follows is certainly OT for SpamAssassin. I am setting up SA3 with SURBL support, and I am configuring RBLDNSD in order to run a local SURBL copy. Before asking for rsync permission, I'd like to test the configuration on a non-production system (with a non-production IP address). I

Re: Forged outlook headers with outlook

I think the last time this happened had something to do with the received headers in the message, if I recall correctly. There was a fix for an instance of this fairly recently, but I don't recall the details. The fix may have been in the 3.1 stream. Thank you. I have 3.0.4 here and no p

Re: DATE_IN_FUTURE false positive

Ratchanee Wongwisarnsee wrote on Tue, 19 Jul 2005 16:09:26 +0700: > I’ve some problem with the DATE_IN_FUTURE rules since it cause a false > positive Well, some details may help. Also, if possible, please send text/plain only, thanks :-) Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at

ruleset for antidrug.cf

Hi list, Our servers are frequently getting spam mails with taablets , or ta.blets in the subject. I run rules_du_jour regularly, I am surprised there is no ruleset for catching this kind of subjects /\bta+\.?b(let)?s\b/ Has someone already a ruleset for this Thanks Ram --

DATE_IN_FUTURE false positive

Hi all   I’ve some problem with the DATE_IN_FUTURE rules since it cause a false positive. Does anyone have any suggestion? I am considering to decrease the score of this rule but I concern that it will cause more spam get through.   Thanks

Re: Early Questions

Mark Williams wrote on Tue, 19 Jul 2005 08:32:11 +0100: > (q1) Given that this is a site-wide installation, how do I get the > requisite 200 e-mails (spam/ham) for spamassassin to work with? Collect them from the mailboxes you are allowed to check. Maybe just your own. Where > should I put t

Re: Forged outlook headers with outlook

I think the last time this happened had something to do with the received headers in the message, if I recall correctly. There was a fix for an instance of this fairly recently, but I don't recall the details. The fix may have been in the 3.1 stream. Loren

Forged outlook headers with outlook

hello Using SA 3.0.4 I have been receiving false positives with the rule FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK being added to email that is sent from Outlook 6 (2003?). Have looked in the archives and the only suggestion is to set the score to zero; which defeats the idea surely. Is there something wrong wi

Early Questions

Hi All (just joined, so please be gentle;-) ), I have just installed spamassassin v3.0.4 in a test environment (which is a mirror of the live environment) and have a number of questions, which I can not see within the manuals/support documentation. Firstly, this is my configuration: Server: Linu