My experience with VopMail (earlier form of ModusMail) was that I needed
to control releasing the message to the user's mailbox after the batch
finished in the script.
With that said, I think your "copy %1 %2" should be modified so that you
are working on a copy of the file that does not live in y
Felix Natter wrote:
I guess *that* makes it impossible? Is there any other way
to achieve
this?
that depends a lot on what /bin/spamcheck does. Where did it
come from?
Oh, I thought it was part of spamassassin. Now I realize it was
installed by the webserver management software vam
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Received: from host-212-158-194-14.bulldogdsl.com (HELO
phoenix.example.com) (212.158.194.14)
by secure.example.name with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 1
Jul 2005 10:00:52 +0100
What SMTP service generates this header?
Hi Daryl
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Received: from host-212-158-194-14.bulldogdsl.com (HELO
phoenix.example.com) (212.158.194.14)
by secure.example.name with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 1 Jul
2005 10:00:52 +0100
What SMTP service generates this header?
phoenix.example.com is a machine NATte
On Wed, 06 Jul 2005 04:16:26 +0200, Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
At 08:49 PM 7/5/2005, Bjoern Olausson wrote:
Qmail-scanner-queu semms not to submitt the -u flag to spamd. So if I
run spamd with the "-v -u vpopmail" option I get the following error:
check your settings for the vpop
I have been having a problem with the simple batch file that I use for my
mail agent with Vircom's ModusMailL.
The batch is this: (%1 being the message name of the file and %2 being the
emailbox name)
---
copy %1 %2
@call spamassassin -e -D <%2> %1
---
Does anyone have a better working batch
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 12:18:32PM +0200, mouss wrote:
In fact, the problem seems with quoted-printable, not with the
redirection. here is an example (reduced to the minimum, and with munged
URI).
Actually it has nothing to do with quoted-printable. The spammer put i
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Booms [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2005 2:59 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: How can I correctly detect these spams?
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have set all BAYES tests to default values and put in the
> $GLOBAL all SOR
Hi all,
I have set all BAYES tests to default values and put in the $GLOBAL all
SORBS test in my users database.
But since the last hours I got these following listed spams through
without tagging as spam:
From - Wed Jul 6 23:41:18 2005
X-UIDL: 1120671712.M917383P13835051595651377415.hos
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 07/06/2005 04:02:34 PM:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> Andy Jezierski writes:
> > I'm running the mass-checks on my corpus and am noticing that
I'm getting
> > the same errors I reported in bug 4115.
> >
> > Will the results be valid? Or sho
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andy Jezierski writes:
> I'm running the mass-checks on my corpus and am noticing that I'm getting
> the same errors I reported in bug 4115.
>
> Will the results be valid? Or should I not bother?
I don't think it's 4115 -- 4415 looks more likely.
I
I'm running the mass-checks on my corpus
and am noticing that I'm getting the same errors I reported in bug 4115.
Will the results be valid? Or should
I not bother?
Thanks
Andy
Hi Dave,
What os are you on and what version of curl do you have installed?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ curl --version
curl 7.13.2 (i386-pc-linux-gnu) libcurl/7.13.2 OpenSSL/0.9.7e zlib/1.2.2
libidn/0.5.13
Protocols: ftp gopher telnet dict ldap http file https ftps
Features: IDN IPv6 Largefile NTL
Greetings,
Sent this to the MailScanner List, didn't realize
my subscription to the SA List had taken a hike for some reason!
Anyone with a clue, I'm all ears!
> > > Ok,
> > >
> > > Determined Curl Error 7, Socket Error 110 to
> > > be a failure to connect to the 'Host' to r
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
it looks like the mutex might not be respecting multiple uids and
bayes_file_mode as in bug 4161. doh.
btw, the mutex file is intended to be long-lived. See
Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf for documentation on that (iirc).
- --j.
Joe Borg writes:
> Hi,
>
Random email that was forwarded to the customers Exchange server.. no way
to debug... I just happened to notice it later...
The biggest thing is I see the HELO setup on mail servers incorrectly all
the time, I didn't think SPF had anything to do with HELO...
> Brian Taber wrote:
>> Hmmm... A
On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 12:18:32PM +0200, mouss wrote:
> In fact, the problem seems with quoted-printable, not with the
> redirection. here is an example (reduced to the minimum, and with munged
> URI).
Actually it has nothing to do with quoted-printable. The spammer put in an
invalid HTML tag:
> >I guess *that* makes it impossible? Is there any other way
> to achieve
> >this?
>
> that depends a lot on what /bin/spamcheck does. Where did it
> come from?
Oh, I thought it was part of spamassassin. Now I realize it was
installed by the webserver management software vamsys.
It is a m
Perhaps it is causing fps because of something else in your mail path. For
instance, if you have a virus scanner that inserts oddly-formatted Received:
headers this sort of rule will often end up triggering, since you have
managed to reproduce a typical spammer indication, presumably
unintentional
At 08:16 AM 7/6/2005, Felix Natter wrote:
> What tool are you using to call SA?
I am using qmail, using a .qmail-file:
|/bin/spamcheck [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/home/m2004001/popuser/ldc.de/felix.natter/Maildir/
I guess *that* makes it impossible? Is there any other way to achieve
this?
that depend
Or you could use user aliases to local procmail scripts, and when the
scripts are done, they simply forward the email to the internal server.
Works great.
Chris Santerre
System Admin and SARE/URIBL Ninja
http://www.rulesemporium.com
http://www.uribl.com
>-Original Message-
>From: Greg
The Doctor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
on 07/05/2005 07:41:30 PM:
> Spam Assassin 3.0.4 works with milter-spamc 0.25, smf-spamd and MailScanner
> Current.
>
> Spam Assassin 3.1.0 only works MailScanner Current less than 10% .
>
> How can I help to determine where the source of the problem is?
>
> > pts rule name description
> > --
> > --
> > [..snip..]
> > 3.9 FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK Forged mail pretending to be from MS
> > Outlook
> > [..snip..]
> >
> >
> > When changing X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlo
You should have answered Matt's question. F.i. if you were using
MailScanner and Mailwatch this wouldn't be a problem at all ...
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
IE-Center: http://ie5.de & http://msie.winware.org
wrote on Wed, 6 Jul 2005 15:49:30 +0800:
> I'm using spamassassin 3.0.2 running on Linux. But I found that some
> rules such as 'UNIQUE_WORDS'
> is not applicable with Thai language and
> it cause false positive on Thai mails. So how should I do? Is there
>
> another way to protect Thai languag
Steven Dickenson wrote on Wed, 6 Jul 2005 06:33:59 -0400:
> That's probably what makes me a little paranoid about bayes, we run
> it site wide so I'm always worried the database will go south PDQ.
I think the decision on using user-specific or site-wide Bayes strongly
depends on how much (man
On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 02:07:39PM +0200, Philipp Snizek wrote:
> Hi
>
>
> pts rule name description
> --
> --
> [..snip..]
> 3.9 FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK Forged mail pretending to be from MS
> Outlook
> [..sn
> > I've got a question: from the docs I see this syntax:
> > add_header { spam | ham | all } header_name string and on
> my system
> > I have:
> > add_header all Status "_YESNO_, score=_SCORE_ required=_REQD_
> > tests=_TESTS_ autolearn=_AUTOLEARN_ version=_VERSION_"
> >
> > But no headers
Jesse Shumaker wrote:
Hi
This looks good and I think I may try this perl module. It seems that
it's geared towards a single workstation and not a network of machines.
They say that you point your client to localhost, which means that each
machine must have this installed. How are you guys run
Hi
pts rule name description
--
--
[..snip..]
3.9 FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK Forged mail pretending to be from MS
Outlook
[..snip..]
When changing X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616 to
X-Mailer: Micr
Felix Natter wrote:
I am experimenting with spamassassin (3.0.x) settings and for
this purpose I would like to see why some messages were not
recognized as spam (which tests matched and how many points
total), just like the information I get to see for positives.
Is there a way to achieve this
> I am experimenting with spamassassin (3.0.x) settings and for
> this purpose I would like to see why some messages were not
> recognized as spam (which tests matched and how many points
> total), just like the information I get to see for positives.
> Is there a way to achieve this?
I've got
Hi,
Here is some relevant info:
1. this is a site-wide install. I.e. all users have the same local.cf etc.
2. spamd seems to be running as root.
3. I found this site; I don't know whether this is my problem but I'll try:
http://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/Mail/Message/spamassassin-dev/2507226
4. User
> Hi,
> These are the lines in my local.cf:
>
> bayes_path /home/sharedspam/.spamassassin/bayes
> auto_whitelist_path /home/sharedspam/.spamassassin/auto-whitelist
> bayes_file_mode 777
> auto_whitelist_file_mode 777
> lock_method flock
777 is rather insecure... What's the output of ls -al on
Hi,
These are the lines in my local.cf:
bayes_path /home/sharedspam/.spamassassin/bayes
auto_whitelist_path /home/sharedspam/.spamassassin/auto-whitelist
bayes_file_mode 777
auto_whitelist_file_mode 777
lock_method flock
Except for the last line, the others were also present for my 2.63 config
an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Jul 6, 2005, at 12:44 AM, jdow wrote:
OK OK - I made it 4.999 just for you. {^_-}
Thanks, I'll sleep better now knowing this... :-P
I was under the impression you made BAYES_99 worth 99 points. 5
points for bayes isn't terrible, provided yo
The Doctor wrote on Tue, 5 Jul 2005 18:41:30 -0600:
> Spam Assassin 3.1.0 only works MailScanner Current less than 10% .
What do you mean by that? MailScanner latest plus SA 3.1.0-pre-something
works. No problems at all.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet S
On 7/6/05, Joe Borg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> I've tried moving the file. What happens is that a new one is created;
> usually belonging to a different user on the system and then, that get
This is something strange.
> stuck. In other words the problem keeps on reoccurring.
What all is
Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote:
That domain is listed for quitte some time...
URIBL_BLACK 3.00, URIBL_JP_SURBL 4.26, URIBL_OB_SURBL 3.21, URIBL_SBL
4.26, URIBL_WS_SURBL 1.46
But then again, without headers we also dont know much more then you do :)
True!
In fact, the problem seems with quoted-
Hi,
I've tried moving the file. What happens is that a new one is created;
usually belonging to a different user on the system and then, that get
stuck. In other words the problem keeps on reoccurring.
Joe
-Original Message-
From: crisppy fernandes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 06 July
-- Forwarded message --
From: crisppy fernandes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Jul 6, 2005 3:33 PM
Subject: Re: Autolearn problem
To: Joe Borg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On 7/6/05, Joe Borg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Crisppy,
> Yes I've run that command and the output seems just fine.
>
Hi Crisppy,
Yes I've run that command and the output seems just fine.
I've now noticed however that in my bayes directory there is a (strange)
file called auto-whitelist.mutex. The file only has rw permissions for the
user and the file seems to be created with the user and group of a given
user on
On Wed, 06 Jul 2005 04:16:26 +0200, Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
At 08:49 PM 7/5/2005, Bjoern Olausson wrote:
Qmail-scanner-queu semms not to submitt the -u flag to spamd. So if I
run spamd with the "-v -u vpopmail" option I get the following error:
check your settings for the vp
Hi Daryl,
Even though the Argument problem is now gone, I'm still getting
Autolearn=fail in my spam messages. I'm under the impression that
autolearning is turned on by default is this correct? What else could be the
issue?
Thanks,
Joe
-Original Message-
From: Joe Borg [mailto:[EMAIL PRO
Hi!
3.0.4 finds it fine in my test. As usual, run with -D:
debug: uri found:
http://ar.atwola.com/redir/B0/NIGMELhw-OhjdGRhu9krS8hjdsxhHJMd7aZyBahYZOlB1rRxxNchtg$$/http://medsavenow.com/?name=revup
debug: uri found: http://medsavenow.com/?name=revup
The problem is likely that when the message
Hi!
Spam Assassin 3.0.4 works with milter-spamc 0.25, smf-spamd and MailScanner
Current.
Spam Assassin 3.1.0 only works MailScanner Current less than 10% .
How can I help to determine where the source of the problem is?
I have no idea what you are talking about. Are you talking about
MailSc
Hi!
I'm using spamassassin 3.0.2 running on Linux. But I found that some rules such
as 'UNIQUE_WORDS' is not applicable with Thai language and it cause false
positive on Thai mails. So how should I do? Is there another way to protect
Thai language to hit some rules while the English messages ca
Thanks Daryl,
Solved the problem. Had use_auto_whitelist with no Boolean.
Joe
-Original Message-
From: Daryl C. W. O'Shea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 06 July 2005 09:41
To: Joe Borg
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Autolearn problem
Joe Borg wrote:
> Hi,
> I've just upg
Joe Borg wrote:
Hi,
I've just upgraded from Spamassassin 2.63 to 3.04 (deleted old bayes since I
wanted new bayes). I've now noticed that in the message header I'm getting
autolearn=failed. Running spamassassin --lint gives the following result:
Argument "" isn't numeric in numeric eq (==) at
/u
Hi,
I've just upgraded from Spamassassin 2.63 to 3.04 (deleted old bayes since I
wanted new bayes). I've now noticed that in the message header I'm getting
autolearn=failed. Running spamassassin --lint gives the following result:
Argument "" isn't numeric in numeric eq (==) at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_
50 matches
Mail list logo
