spamd/spamc does not add headers

Command: spamd –c –d –r /var/run/spamd/spamd.pid Version: 3.0.4 Platform: FreeBSD 5.4   When I run the command:   Cat spam.msg | spamassassin | grep –I spam   I get:       with SpamAssassin (version 3.0.4); Subject: *SPAM* =?utf-8?B?T2ZmaWNlIFhQIC0gJDYwICBjaGVja3N1bXM

NOTICE: 3.1.0 mass-checks heads up

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all -- we're going to be starting the mass-checks for 3.1.0 RSN. These will be used to generate an up-to-date score set for that release. If you have a hand-classified set of mail corpora [1], and are able and willing to run mass-check over the

Re: What else is necessary for Bayes?

At 11:45 AM 6/26/2005, Matt Wills wrote: # Enable Bayes auto-learning bayes_auto_learn 1 bayes_path/home/spamd/ That bayes_path is probably NOT what you want. Read the docs carefully. Despite being named "bayes_path" it's really a path AND a partial filename. try adding "bay

Re: Customizing headers

Erwin Zavala wrote: Could some explain to me what each of these line says. If you are going to refer me to the manual, please save it. I am asking this question because I cannot understand the syntax from the manual. The manual is actually not very difficult to read, but since you asked,

Re: What else is necessary for Bayes?

Matt Wills wrote on Sun, 26 Jun 2005 11:45:09 -0400: > What am I missing? Simply run a "spamassassin -D --lint" to find out ... You probably didn't learn it enough *ham*. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com IE-Center: http:

Paypal phishing rules

Hi all, I've been tinkering with this rule for a while, and have got to the point where is seems to do what I want, but I can't see the wood for the trees so I'd appreciate comments for improvement from fresh eyes, and people with a different spam/ham corpus to me. It has 3 checks: 1) Mail is f

What else is necessary for Bayes?

My local.cf is like so: # Enable the Bayes system use_bayes 1 # Enable Bayes auto-learning bayes_auto_learn 1 bayes_path/home/spamd/ bayes_file_mode 0666 using sa-learn --spam etc., Bayes analyzed 270 messages. I restarted spamd. Am I mistaken that testing o

Re: Nested yahoo spam

In an older episode (Sunday 26 June 2005 14:23), Loren Wilton wrote: > At a guess, these would be rawbody rules on 3.0+. On 2.6x many times you > can't get to the intervening headers, but if you can, it is usually a 'full' > rule. Test result: using debian's SA 3.0.4-2, neither rawbody nor body c

Re: Nested yahoo spam

At a guess, these would be rawbody rules on 3.0+. On 2.6x many times you can't get to the intervening headers, but if you can, it is usually a 'full' rule. Since rawbody rules are single line you should be able to safely search for something like rawbody FOO/^Note:\swhatever/ Loren

Nested yahoo spam

Lately, we have been receiving spam that appears to go thru several forwarding steps within yahoo until it is finally sent out to listed recipients. The message contains "Note: forwarded message attached". I would like to catch headers of that attached message in a SA rule, now i am not sure wh