Hello All
I'm not sure which settings are supported
when using userprefs with a mysql db
In the sql-readme file from SA i found
a restriction:
"Note that this will NOT look for
test rules, only local scores,
whitelist_from(s), required_score, and
auto_report_threshold."
But in the page from D
On a brand new RHEL4 installation, I've having problems with Net::DNS:
debug: is Net::DNS::Resolver available? yes
debug: Net::DNS version: 0.51
debug: trying (3) apache.org...
debug: looking up NS for 'apache.org'
debug: NS lookup of apache.org failed horribly => Perhaps your
resolv.conf isn't
Thank you for the report but is it fair to run masses for filtering
phishing emails ? Phishing emails are not sent using the same bulk mailing
software spammers use. Spammers most of the time dont even understand SMTP
451 retry but phishermen do. Also, phish doesn't go with spam and ham..its
seafoo
Theo, I thought the warning on rule name length and description length had
either been eliminated to drastically lengthened for non-English rules. Or was
this only in the 3.1 stream? I know there was work done on this somewhere.
Loren
On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 06:05:10AM +0200, Jim Knuth wrote:
> sorry, but that`s not all. lint has 187 issues detected. Which is
> (see attachment warning.txt)
The warnings are all covered by my previous message. The description over 50
chars warning is known and apparently unavoidable for German.
Hallo und guten Morgen Theo,
Heute (am 21.06.2005 - 05:28 Uhr)
schriebst Du:
> lang de describe T_RCVD_IN_IADB_LIST_T Senderechner in IADB-Liste
> (www.isipp.com)
sorry, but that`s not all. lint has 187 issues detected. Which is
(see attachment warning.txt)
--
Viele Grüße, Kind regards
Hallo und guten Morgen Theo,
Heute (am 21.06.2005 - 05:28 Uhr)
schriebst Du:
> Aha. So there are three things here. First, I misread the warning.
> Second, you are running with a locale for Germany, so you get the rule
> descriptions from 30_text_de.cf. Third, the rule translations have a
On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 04:59:30AM +0200, Jim Knuth wrote:
> >> warning: description exists for non-existent rule T_RCVD_IN_IADB_LIST_T
>
> Mmh. wget from
> http://www.apache.de/dist/spamassassin/source/Mail-SpamAssassin-3.0.4.tar.gz
> I`ts no development.
Aha. So there are three things here. F
Hallo und guten Morgen Theo,
Heute (am 21.06.2005 - 04:33 Uhr)
schriebst Du:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 03:41:41AM +0200, Jim Knuth wrote:
>> I`ve updated from SA 2.64 to 3.0.4. I use SA with amavisd-new
>> 2.3.1. When I try spamassassin --lint -D comes:
>>
>> warning: description exists for
On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 03:41:41AM +0200, Jim Knuth wrote:
> I`ve updated from SA 2.64 to 3.0.4. I use SA with amavisd-new
> 2.3.1. When I try spamassassin --lint -D comes:
>
> warning: description exists for non-existent rule T_RCVD_IN_IADB_LIST_T
Hrm. You seem to have some development rule fil
On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 11:31:01AM +1000, SSK1 wrote:
> Basically I would like to know if it's possible to have a
> linux/SpamAssassin server receive smtp traffic and then pass it on to
> the passthru/exchange server once checked.
> If it is possible, apart from Spamassassin, what other ingredients
Hallo und guten Morgen List,
I`ve updated from SA 2.64 to 3.0.4. I use SA with amavisd-new
2.3.1. When I try spamassassin --lint -D comes:
--snip
warning: description for HTML_SHOUTING4 is over 50 chars
warning: description for CLICK_TO_REMOVE_1 is over 50 chars
warning: description for RCVD_IN_S
Our inbound/outbound SMTP mail is traversing via MessageLabs..
Cut a long story stort - I want to bypass messagelabs (costs) and
implement an (in-house) Antispam solution.
(domain1.com) I have 12 (W2K/Linux) Domino Servers including the (w2k)
Passthru Server.
(domain2.com) I have 1 2003 exchang
On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 08:05:32PM -0400, Murty Rompalli wrote:
> Also, I believe PGP signed messages cause a negative score. Can someone
> confirm this one, I am lazy after a long day. I know TRUSTED_HOSTS has a
> negative score to compensate, just dont know if PGP signed carries
> negative score
On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 08:01:15PM -0400, Murty Rompalli wrote:
> Thank you for the report but is it fair to run masses for filtering
> phishing emails ?
Sure, why not? Phish mails are spam.
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
"Special? Our longest phone conversation is 'Get over here.'" - Ross on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
I did get this and other replies from list users! My rule does not assign
a score of 5.0 (threshold to call it spam for sure). So, an email can
still get a score of 4.0 from my phish block rule and still go through
unless ofcourse you changed the t
From: "Murty Rompalli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Quite fair - look at all the ham the rules hit. They are not very
good rules.
{^_^}
> Thank you for the report but is it fair to run masses for filtering
> phishing emails ? Phishing emails are not sent using the same bulk mailing
> software spammers us
Thank you for the report but is it fair to run masses for filtering
phishing emails ? Phishing emails are not sent using the same bulk mailing
software spammers use. Spammers most of the time dont even understand SMTP
451 retry but phishermen do. Also, phish doesn't go with spam and ham..its
seafoo
I'll be using the SA 3.0.4 and not the "pre" version. Hopefully that will help.
I'll have to check to see which version of milter-spamc they are using however.
I was afraid the the products had to be "built" with version specific libraries, or something similar, that would make a simple "replac
Hello All.
We have a smarthost running spamassassin in the permiter, this host
relays email for our internal domains to an M$ Exchange server in our
private LAN. Spamassassin is doing a great job in filtering most
spams.
I get my MS Exchange users to drop any 'Undetected SPAM' to a folder
whi
Hello Ben,
Monday, June 20, 2005, 6:50:46 AM, you wrote:
BH> I get 139 "errors" regarding the 70_sare_whitelist.cf entries. from
BH> 3.1pre. Has the syntax for whitelist_from_rcvd changed?
BH> Ben
Which version of 70_sare_whitelist.cf? What are the errors?
Yes, the syntax for whitelist_from_rc
Justin Mason wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matt Kettler writes:
Craig Jackson wrote:
Regarding the report that is made part of the header, instead of a
summary of the email (which makes downloading tiresomely long even on a
high speed connection), I would like
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> 30_text_de.cf:lang de describe HASHCASH_HIGH Enthält korrekte
> Hashcash-Kennzeichnung (> 25 bits)
> 50_scores.cf:score HASHCASH_HIGH -5.000
>
> Where's that warning coming from?
Perhaps the ä?
--
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902
Hispanic
I installed on CentOS which I have never done before. Everything is okay
except for one thing. I get
[28414] warn: config: warning: description exists for non-existent rule
HASHCASH_HIGH
+ 7 ever HASHCASH rule warnings in --lint
all the other output is exactly like on my other non-CentOS syste
The current one from SARE works fine :)
And, the latest RDJ has support for all the SARE rules.
LER
--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org
US Mail: 3535 Gaspar Drive, Dallas, TX 75220-3611 US
-Orig
Ben Hanson wrote:
I get 139 "errors" regarding the 70_sare_whitelist.cf entries. from
3.1pre. Has the syntax for whitelist_from_rcvd changed?
Ben
This is due to the comments Bob had at the end of each entry, without a
# before them.
He was going to correct this prior to the 3.1 release. I
Bryan Haase asked Monday, June 20, 2005 0830:
> Does anyone have a rule that will score foreign characters or characters with
the dashes on top?
> Below is example email that is not scoring at all for me.
>
> Thanks
> Bryan
>
>
> >>> berton laurence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 6/18/2005 7:52 PM >>>
>
On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 11:34:26AM -0500, Andy Jezierski wrote:
> I've noticed that when starting up SA 3.1 the main spamd process doesn't
> change userid's like 3.0.x did. It stays as root but the child processes
> do switch over. Is this normal?
Yes. The parent now stays as root so that th
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>"Ryan" == Ryan L Sun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
> Ryan> Does "dul.dnsbl.sorbs.net" list all the dynamic IPs?
> Ryan> Or just the dynamic IPs which fall in spamtrap?
>
> It includes IP addresses that are not dynamic as well. It seems to
> make unintelligent
> "Ryan" == Ryan L Sun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ryan> Does "dul.dnsbl.sorbs.net" list all the dynamic IPs?
Ryan> Or just the dynamic IPs which fall in spamtrap?
It includes IP addresses that are not dynamic as well. It seems to
make unintelligent guesses as well
==John ffitch
Yeah, I'm seeing that too, see the bug here:
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4410
* Jason Brunette ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
* Excel.Net,Inc. - http://www.excel.net/
* (920) 452-0455 - Sheboygan/Plymouth area
* (888) 489-9995 - Other areas, toll-free
Doing some testing with 3.1 and ran
across this in the log:
Jun 20 14:30:49 python spamassassin[36101]:
syswrite() on closed filehandle GEN5 at /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.6/mach/IO/Handle
.pm line 451.
Jun 20 14:30:49 python spamassassin[36101]:
Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or st
Hey Michael (or anyone else who sees this) -
I'm in the process of switching over spamd to use mysql instead of flat
files for user preferences - here's my dilemma:
The doc for 2.6 (I'm using 3.04 but in principle I believe it's the
same) makes not of making sure the correct username (email
addr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matt Kettler writes:
> Craig Jackson wrote:
> > Regarding the report that is made part of the header, instead of a
> > summary of the email (which makes downloading tiresomely long even on a
> > high speed connection), I would like to see only the tex
Craig Jackson wrote:
> Regarding the report that is made part of the header, instead of a
> summary of the email (which makes downloading tiresomely long even on a
> high speed connection), I would like to see only the text that tripped
> each particular test. Users often want to know what exactly
I had good luck eliminating this by using sa-learn. It took about 15
messages
before the score went high enough to register as spam.
Shelley Waltz
Bryan Haase said:
> Does anyone have a rule that will score foreign characters or characters
> with the dashes on top?
> Below is example email that
I have installed SpamAssassin v3.1.0pre on a test system running Solaris
8, Perl 5.8.5, and Razor 2.67. I got the following message when I lint:
# spamassassin --lint
[15182] warn: razor2: razor2 check failed: No such file or directory
Can't use an undefined value as a SCALAR reference at
/usr/
Dr Robert Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote on 06/20/2005 12:48:21 PM:
> We are looking at upgrading from V2 to V3 of Spamassassin. The previous
> system person installed milter-spamc to link into sendmail with the
v2
> product (v2.6'ish I think).
>
> Since we are looking at the Spamassassin up
On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 06:17:25PM +0200, Marco Herrn wrote:
> udp 368 0 *:34602 *:*
> 10608/spamd child
> udp 368 0 *:34603 *:*
> 10608/spamd child
> udp 368 0 *:3460
Marco Herrn wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using spamd and told it to listen only on the local interface:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ps aux|grep spamd
> root 1764 0.0 3.0 34456 30672 ? SNs Jun01 0:00 /usr/bin/perl
> -T
> -w /usr/sbin/spamd --create-prefs --max-children 5 --helper-home-dir
We are looking at upgrading from V2 to V3 of Spamassassin. The previous
system person installed milter-spamc to link into sendmail with the v2
product (v2.6'ish I think).
Since we are looking at the Spamassassin upgrade, are there any
corresponding upgrades "mandatory" for milter ?
Since th
On Mon, 20 Jun 2005 11:50:09 +0100, in local.spamassassin you wrote:
>>Jun 20 11:43:18 highland mimedefang-multiplexor[89044]: Slave 1 stderr:
>Failed to run DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL RBL SpamAssassin test, skipping:
>(Can't call method "bgsend" on an undefined value at
>/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5
On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 08:29:19AM -0700, Kenneth Porter wrote:
> >OVERALL% SPAM% HAM% S/ORANK SCORE NAME
>
> How does one read this chart? (Ideally I'm looking for an answer in the
> wiki, but I couldn't find one there. I thought it might be in the FAQ or
> under SubmittingNewR
On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 09:43:05AM +0200, Bart Verwilst wrote:
> Does SA 3.1.0 have support for expiring bayes and AWL data? SA 3.0 just
> keeps filling the mysql databases containing this data endlessly.. My db
> has a couple of million entries now and still growing, and there is no
> way to clean
I know some of the rules at SARE: http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules.htm are aimed at English only environments, and will score non English e-mail higher. Look for the .cf files with _eng in the names.>>> "Bryan Haase" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 6/20/2005 11:30 AM >>>
Does anyone have a rule that will s
I've noticed that when starting up SA 3.1 the main
spamd process doesn't change userid's like 3.0.x did. It stays as
root but the child processes do switch over. Is this normal?
Old box FreeBSD 5.3
SA 3.0.2
spamd_flags="-m 5 -u spamd -x -d -r ${pidfile}
--max-conn-per-child 10 -A 198.180.157
Hi,
I am using spamd and told it to listen only on the local interface:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ps aux|grep spamd
root 1764 0.0 3.0 34456 30672 ? SNs Jun01 0:00 /usr/bin/perl -T
-w /usr/sbin/spamd --create-prefs --max-children 5 --helper-home-dir
--syslog=/var/log/spamd.log -q --de
First, the AWL isn't a whitelist. Period. It's a score averager.
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/AutoWhitelist
> I have a particular address whitelisted via "spamassassin
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]"
No, that command does not whitelist a sender.
It adds ONE message scored at -100 to the sender's
On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 02:06:11PM +0100, Ron McKeating wrote:
> Is it possible to have a standard setting that does not put a full
> report in the header for normal users, but does for one or 2 selected
> users?
If it is exiscan you are currently using, then I guess you currently
have something l
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi!
>
> A Mail is identified as spam with a score of 17 but I don't know how and
> why. It is autowhitelisted and the only other score is from the rule
> HTML_MESSAGE witch defaults to 0.001 points.
First, ignore the "white" in "autowhitelist". It's a score average
Does anyone have a rule that will score foreign characters or characters with
the dashes on top?
Below is example email that is not scoring at all for me.
Thanks
Bryan
>>> berton laurence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 6/18/2005 7:52 PM >>>
ТРАНСБЛОК XXI
Наша компания оказывает юридич
--On Sunday, June 19, 2005 8:16 PM -0400 Theo Van Dinter
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
OVERALL% SPAM% HAM% S/ORANK SCORE NAME
How does one read this chart? (Ideally I'm looking for an answer in the
wiki, but I couldn't find one there. I thought it might be in the FAQ or
under
I've used local MySQL on several SA servers before now (without a
cluster). It worked well. I used the same bayes database to 'seed' all
of the servers so they at least started with the same data.
I didn't notice any huge differences in scores and on the whole it
worked well - if inelegantly.
Nig
At 08:18 AM 6/20/2005, Chris Knipe wrote:
Uhm... I'm a bit worried about the below The 5 processes are also
utilising close to 400MB of my swap space
USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TT STAT STARTED TIME COMMAND
spamd7167 0.0 13.5 140664 140020 ?? I 2:03PM 0:03.36
At 09:52 AM 6/20/2005, Robert Swan wrote:
I am getting an error when I run manual learning sa-learn ham . Has
anyone seen this before or have a clue how to fix it
debug: bayes: DB_File module not installed, cannot use Bayes
As it says, you need to install DB_File. This is going to be some
On Mon, 2005-06-20 at 18:51 +0530, Rakesh wrote:
> Ron McKeating wrote:
>
> >Is it possible to have a standard setting that does not put a full
> >report in the header for normal users, but does for one or 2 selected
> >users?
> >
> >Ron
> >
> >
> >
> Are you directly using Spamc or using Amavis
"Larry Rosenman"
wrote on 06/19/2005 01:46:41 PM:
> Another one you might want to add to that list:
>
> Crypt::OpenSSL::Bignum
>
> The pre-req chain for Mail::DomainKeys doesn't req it, but apparently
SA
> 3.1.0pre1 does.
>
> LER
>
Yep, ditto here. This was with the last SVN build though.
Further to my last post regarding the Mysql Backend to multiple Spamd
servers. How much difference would there be if I ran the (in this case )
2 servers on a round robin basis from exim. So over time they would both
recieve a fair enough diverse amount of mail to make them practically
identical
Hi Robert,
You need to install the DB_File perl module. Do the
following:
perl -eshell -MCPAN
install DB_File
Cheers,
Chris
From: Robert Swan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 20 June 2005 14:53To:
users@spamassassin.apache.orgSubject: Bayes learning
error
I am getting an erro
I am getting an error when I run manual learning “sa-learn
–ham” . Has anyone seen this before or have a clue how to fix it
debug: bayes: DB_File module not installed, cannot use Bayes
I am using Redhat, spamassassin 3.03 spamd,spamc, postfix
thanks
Robert Swan
I get 139 "errors" regarding the 70_sare_whitelist.cf entries. from
3.1pre. Has the syntax for whitelist_from_rcvd changed?
Ben
Ron McKeating wrote:
Is it possible to have a standard setting that does not put a full
report in the header for normal users, but does for one or 2 selected
users?
Ron
Are you directly using Spamc or using Amavis or MailScanner or something
else as a wrapper. If you are using MailScanner
Is it possible to have a standard setting that does not put a full
report in the header for normal users, but does for one or 2 selected
users?
Ron
--
Ron McKeating
Senior IT Services Specialist
Computing Services
Loughborough University
01509 222329
Hi!
A Mail is identified as spam with a score of 17 but I don't know how and
why. It is autowhitelisted and the only other score is from the rule
HTML_MESSAGE witch defaults to 0.001 points. After all the "identified
spam" is learned as ham ?!
Jun 18 21:01:35 fw spamd[31276]: identified sp
Lo all,
Uhm... I'm a bit worried about the below The 5
processes are also utilising close to 400MB of my swap space
USER PID %CPU
%MEM VSZ RSS TT STAT
STARTED TIME COMMANDspamd
7167 0.0 13.5 140664 140020 ?? I
2:03PM 0:03.36 spamd child (perl5.8.6)spa
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 01:01:11PM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
Is it disabling the autolearning because it already autolearned it,
maybe? Or is it disabling the autolearning because of something else
that might be going wrong?
It's disabled because you've disabl
After a recent upgrade of MIMEDefang and SpamAssassin I get this:
>Jun 20 11:43:18 highland mimedefang-multiplexor[89044]: Slave 1 stderr: Failed
>to run DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL RBL SpamAssassin test, skipping: (Can't call
>method "bgsend" on an undefined value at
>/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_pe
I suspect you wanted to perform a "sa-learn --sync" first. But I do not
know for sure.
{^_^}
- Original Message -
From: "Roman Serbski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Dear colleagues,
Could you please share the correct procedure for moving bayes database
from the server powered by SA 3.0.2 to anot
Dear colleagues,
Could you please share the correct procedure for moving bayes database
from the server powered by SA 3.0.2 to another server with 3.0.4
installed?
Here is what I did:
1. sa-learn --backup > db.txt (on old server)
2. Transfer of bayes db files from old server to a new one.
cd /v
On Mon, 13 Jun 2005, Theo Van Dinter uttered the following:
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 09:42:35PM +0200, wolfgang wrote:
>> - 3.0.4 appears to bring new challenges (Net::DNS version and such)
>
> 3.0.4 should be a drop-in replacement for earlier versions. People seem
> to be having issues if they
Hello,
Does SA 3.1.0 have support for expiring bayes and AWL data? SA 3.0 just
keeps filling the mysql databases containing this data endlessly.. My db
has a couple of million entries now and still growing, and there is no
way to clean em reliably..
Thanks in advance!
--
Bart Verwilst
Linux R&D
71 matches
Mail list logo
