Quoting wolfgang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Apparently, downgrading Net::DNS to 0.49 seems to fix this problem. Can
> anyone
> else comment on this?
Doing just that worked for me here.
Regards,
d.
Hi Tim, Dimitri,
Sorry to resurrect such an old thread! I'm a bit concerned with the 500
error code being downloaded into the SA_DIR.
Tim Jackson wrote:
Lint output: config: SpamAssassin failed to parse line, skipping:
config: SpamAssassin failed to parse line, skipping:
config: SpamAssas
For all RDJ and SARE users:
I have released version 1.21 of Rules du Jour. The only change is that
ALL SARE rulesets are now included in the default registry. If you have
additional ruleset information you believe should be included by
default, please contact me directly.
Chris Thielen
R
Am Sonntag, 12. Juni 2005 09:09 schrieb Stefan Ewert:
> Am Sonntag, 12. Juni 2005 01:39 schrieb Thomas Cameron:
> > On Sat, 2005-06-11 at 18:41 +0200, Stefan Ewert wrote:
> > > but as you can see im using dns version 0.51 and it doesnt work for me.
> > > so if anyone has another suggest id happy to
Am 06/12/2005 06:18 PM schrieb Bookworm:
Most of the email I'm trying to run sa-learn on is owned by vpopmail,
and my spamassassin runs as the user 'spamd'.
Even when I try sa-learn -u spamd, it continually learns as 'root' -
filling a bayes database in the root directory.
Is there anyway to s
Most of the email I'm trying to run sa-learn on is owned by vpopmail,
and my spamassassin runs as the user 'spamd'.
Even when I try sa-learn -u spamd, it continually learns as 'root' -
filling a bayes database in the root directory.
Is there anyway to stop this? I REALLY don't want to have t
In an older episode (Sunday 12 June 2005 04:45), Dean Hollister wrote:
>
> It appears to be looking for the file mx.al, however no such file exists as
> part of the Net::DNS Perl module.
>
> Has this been experienced before and how can it be resolved? Can anyone
help?
Apparently, downgrading
Hi,
I get this message on 2 servers, while all my other servers, with the
same config are ok.
debug: DNS: timeout for ahbl after 20 seconds
Any idea of what could be wrong?
Regards,
Ugo
Has the behaviour of the uri rule been changed at some point to match the
whole of the URL? I have just noticed I am getting some FP when one of my
uri rules matches against the URL rather than URI.
To prevent FP would be very difficult, I think to match the whole of the URL
with uri rules is not s
Quoting Stefan Ewert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Am Sonntag, 12. Juni 2005 01:39 schrieb Thomas Cameron:
> > On Sat, 2005-06-11 at 18:41 +0200, Stefan Ewert wrote:
> > > but as you can see im using dns version 0.51 and it doesnt work for
> me.
> > > so if anyone has another suggest id happy to hear abo
Am Sonntag, 12. Juni 2005 01:39 schrieb Thomas Cameron:
> On Sat, 2005-06-11 at 18:41 +0200, Stefan Ewert wrote:
> > but as you can see im using dns version 0.51 and it doesnt work for me.
> > so if anyone has another suggest id happy to hear about it ;)
>
> 0.51 didn't work for me, either on RHEL
11 matches
Mail list logo
