On Saturday 11 June 2005 11:02 pm, alan premselaar wrote:
> Chris wrote:
> > I've seen this a couple of times the last few days in my syslog.
> > Tonight, I saw it after updating to 3.0.4:
> >
> > Jun 11 19:38:21 cpollock spamd[7668]: server killed by SIGTERM, shutting
> > down Jun 11 19:38:22 cpo
Chris wrote:
I've seen this a couple of times the last few days in my syslog. Tonight, I
saw it after updating to 3.0.4:
Jun 11 19:38:21 cpollock spamd[7668]: server killed by SIGTERM, shutting down
Jun 11 19:38:22 cpollock spamassassin: spamd shutdown succeeded
Jun 11 19:53:32 cpollock spamc
Hi there,
Recently upgraded to 3.0.4 and receive the following error in the log whenever
SpamAssassin attempts to report Spam...
Use of inherited AUTOLOAD for non-method Net::DNS::mx() is deprecated
at /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.6/Mail/SpamAssassin/Reporter.pm line 464.
Can't locate au
I've seen this a couple of times the last few days in my syslog. Tonight, I
saw it after updating to 3.0.4:
Jun 11 19:38:21 cpollock spamd[7668]: server killed by SIGTERM, shutting down
Jun 11 19:38:22 cpollock spamassassin: spamd shutdown succeeded
Jun 11 19:53:32 cpollock spamc[26370]: connec
On 6/10/2005 3:04 PM, Eric A. Hall wrote:
> What I specifically need from AWL is number of instances for the current
> sender tuple, with the value of "one" (for the current message) being the
> magic number. Any suggestions would be appreciated.
http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.0.x/dist/do
Just a quick note that SARE's OBFU and Header rule set files have been
updated.
Documentation for these rules files are at
http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules.htm
Bob Menschel
On Sat, 2005-06-11 at 18:41 +0200, Stefan Ewert wrote:
> but as you can see im using dns version 0.51 and it doesnt work for me. so if
> anyone has another suggest id happy to hear about it ;)
0.51 didn't work for me, either on RHEL 2.1. I had to downgrade to
http://www.net-dns.org/download/Net
On Sat, 2005-06-11 at 12:15 -0400, Rick Macdougall wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As was mentioned yesterday on the list, Net::DNS 0.50 seems to be
> broken. If you are running 0.50, upgrade to 0.51 or downgrade to 0.48
I found that I had to downgrade to 0.48_1, 0.48_3 was broken. YMMV.
Thomas
From: "James Bucanek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
jdow wrote on Friday, June 10, 2005:
>1) You need to visit http://www.rulesemporium.com/ and select at least
> a few of the SARE rules sets. They do really help SA performance.
I'm checking these out now.
>2) I found best results here if I bucked up th
For those thinking of upgrading who have patched earlier versions of 3.0.
you will need to do it again after upgrading.
I was disappointed to see the fix for the above bug was not included in
3.0.4, just had to apply the fix again to get the surbl to work with caps in
the URI.
Martin
--On Saturday, June 11, 2005 7:46 PM +0200 Stefan Ewert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
this is a single pc, so i think its better to use a nameserver from the
www. i dont have a local nameserver running( i think ;). do i need a
local nameserver?
Hehe, this just came up and a wiki page was create
Thank you ! Always grateful for your interest.
The question is what do you do with spamassassin headers appearing on
your email messages already?... for rmail
http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_node/Rmail.html#Rmail
I added the question about how to begin to use spamassassin where
the
Am Samstag, 11. Juni 2005 19:13 schrieb Kenneth Porter:
> --On Saturday, June 11, 2005 7:03 PM +0200 Stefan Ewert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> wrote:
> > here ist my resolv.conf:
> >
> > nameserver 127.0.0.1
> > nameserver 217.237.151.161
> > nameserver 217.237.151.33
> >
> > after every reboot, localho
jdow wrote on Friday, June 10, 2005:
>1) You need to visit http://www.rulesemporium.com/ and select at least
> a few of the SARE rules sets. They do really help SA performance.
I'm checking these out now.
>2) I found best results here if I bucked up the BAYES_99 rule to 5
> points. So far I h
Thomas Cameron wrote on Friday, June 10, 2005:
>I have SA (plus spamass-milter to reject, but that's not important for
>this discussion) on a bunch of servers at various client sites. All of
>them except one just flat stop spam. Period. Those clients are just
>tickled pink with the results.
>
>
--On Saturday, June 11, 2005 7:03 PM +0200 Stefan Ewert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
here ist my resolv.conf:
nameserver 127.0.0.1
nameserver 217.237.151.161
nameserver 217.237.151.33
after every reboot, localhost is in first place, so every querie takes
some time before the second nameserver
Steven Dickenson wrote on Friday, June 10, 2005:
>James Bucanek wrote:
>> Greetings, As you can see, the Bayes filter has nailed it as spam,
>> but it still only gets a score of 3.6.
>
>Bayes scores are really quite low in SA v3 - 3.0.2. You may want to
>upgrade to 3.0.3 to get the newer Bayes s
Am Samstag, 11. Juni 2005 18:43 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Hi,
>
> I noticed exactly the same yesterday, and when I tried again it worked.
> So I would assume that Net::DNS uses some timeouts which are rather short,
> to retrieve data from my local dns cache Second time through, it will get
> cac
Hi,
I noticed exactly the same yesterday, and when I tried again it worked.
So I would assume that Net::DNS uses some timeouts which are rather short, to
retrieve
data from my local dns cache Second time through, it will get cached values
sooperfast and be happy
Wolfgang Hamann .
>> Hi,
>>
Am Samstag, 11. Juni 2005 18:03 schrieb Stefan Ewert:
> Hi,
> im running spamassassin --lint -D and get the following error:
> debug: is Net::DNS::Resolver available? yes
> debug: Net::DNS version: 0.51
> debug: trying (3) motorola.com...
> debug: looking up NS for 'motorola.com'
> debug: NS lookup
Stefan Ewert wrote:
Hi,
im running spamassassin --lint -D and get the following error:
debug: is Net::DNS::Resolver available? yes
debug: Net::DNS version: 0.51
debug: trying (3) motorola.com...
debug: looking up NS for 'motorola.com'
debug: NS lookup of motorola.com failed horribly => Perhaps y
Hi,
im running spamassassin --lint -D and get the following error:
debug: is Net::DNS::Resolver available? yes
debug: Net::DNS version: 0.51
debug: trying (3) motorola.com...
debug: looking up NS for 'motorola.com'
debug: NS lookup of motorola.com failed horribly => Perhaps your resolv.conf
isn't
On Fri, 10 Jun 2005 22:06:11 -0400, Matt Kettler
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Tim Boyer wrote:
>> I'm using SpamAssassin as a Sendmail milter, called from MIMEDefang.
>> With spamd, it's possible to send the log somewhere else. Is it
>> possible to do so with the Mail::SpamAssassin module? I've r
Don Saklad wrote:
Question.
Where spamassassin headers are appearing on messages already, how do
you set up things for emacs rmail?
http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_node/Rmail.html#Rmail
So far attempts to get the most userful response to this question have
failed !
Sound famul
At 03:01 AM 6/11/2005, you wrote:
Question.
Where spamassassin headers are appearing on messages already, how do
you set up things for emacs rmail?
http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_node/Rmail.html#Rmail
So far attempts to get the most userful response to this question have
failed !
Question.
Where spamassassin headers are appearing on messages already, how do
you set up things for emacs rmail?
http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_node/Rmail.html#Rmail
So far attempts to get the most userful response to this question have
failed !
26 matches
Mail list logo
