I actually don't know if I'm using the * in the headers. How do I check that?
Thanks,
Antonio DeLaCruz
Quoting martin smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
M>-Original Message-
M>From: Antonio DeLaCruz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
M>Sent: 28 April 2005 23:12
M>To: Pettit, Paul
M>Cc: users@spamassassin.a
M>-Original Message-
M>From: Antonio DeLaCruz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
M>Sent: 28 April 2005 23:12
M>To: Pettit, Paul
M>Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
M>Subject: RE: Blacklists entries not getting blocked
M>
M>Attached is a file that contains the header information and
M>the preview o
Obviously from "a man with wealth and taste"...
- Original Message -
From: "Evan Platt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 7:38 AM
Subject: Re: OT?: If you need proof that spammers use the same resources as
us...
At 07:32 AM 4/28/2005, you wrote:
Attached is a file that contains the header information and the preview of the
message as spamassassin modified it. From the body of the e-mail, you can
clearly see that it is looking at my blacklist, it just isn't doing anything
with it. Well, after ramming my head into the wall to knock some se
On Thu, 2005-04-28 at 17:58 -0400, Matt Kettler wrote:
> Ok, is spamd running?
Yep..
root 17321 0.4 5.9 26972 22800 ?Ss 16:50
0:02 /usr/bin/spamd -d -c -m5 -H
root 17323 0.0 5.9 26972 22800 ?S16:50 0:00 spamd
child
root 17324 0.0 5.9 26972 22800 ?
Mike Chambers wrote:
>On Thu, 2005-04-28 at 17:35 -0400, Matt Kettler wrote:
>
>
>
>>1) Is the mail being delivered locally, or relayed to another server?
>>
>>
>
>Locally to my email server, then pop3'd to my client.
>
>
>
>>2) What things have you tried in /etc/procmailrc?
>>
>>
>
>B
On Thu, 2005-04-28 at 17:35 -0400, Matt Kettler wrote:
> 1) Is the mail being delivered locally, or relayed to another server?
Locally to my email server, then pop3'd to my client.
> 2) What things have you tried in /etc/procmailrc?
Below is what worked before I reinstalled..
DROPPRIVS=yes
:0
Mike Chambers wrote:
>I reinstalled my server about a week or two ago, and for the life of me
>can't get spamassassin to check my emails (or if they are, it isn't
>being processed as Spam).
>
>I have the following version installed (running FC4 Test 2 currently,
>but previously installed this was
I reinstalled my server about a week or two ago, and for the life of me
can't get spamassassin to check my emails (or if they are, it isn't
being processed as Spam).
I have the following version installed (running FC4 Test 2 currently,
but previously installed this was all working, just think I'm
In an older episode (Wednesday 27 April 2005 01:29), wolfgang wrote:
> I noticed that DNS_FROM_RFC_BOGUSMX appears not to be working with SA 3.0.2
my mistake, it is working.
regards,
wolfgang
Evan Platt wrote:
> At 07:32 AM 4/28/2005, you wrote:
>
>> Notably one which catches a common "allow me to
>> introduce myself" style opening.
>> It was not particularly clever, simply searching for the 2-word phrase
>> "introduce myself", but lo and behold this week I get:
>>
>> "allow me to intr
At 07:32 AM 4/28/2005, you wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Call me paranoid, but a few weeks back I posted a couple of rules on this
list and to the exit0 wiki which were designed to catch a common phrase
seen in many 419 spams. Notably one which catches a common "allow me to
i
Johnson, S wrote:
> Has anyone attempted to write an OCR filter (optical character
> recognition) for jpg or gif files that contain spam words?
>
Not that I'm aware of, but it's been mentioned MANY times.
Really I think it largely boils down to being more CPU load than it's
worth.
Even the best
Johnson, S wrote:
> I’m working on getting things optimized fully in our filter. I think
> the spammers have been working over time lately.
>
> Once the message has left the linux spamassassin and forwarded onto a
> mail server, say exchange or groupwise.
>
Many have made suggestions about Exchang
> From: Johnson, S
> Once the message has left the linux spamassassin and forwarded onto a
> mail server, say exchange or groupwise. How can I save the message
> so that SA could autolearn the message? The headers and such are not
> saved if I copy and paste the mail into a text file. I also don
Title: Message
I've
done it via a pair of public folders under MS Exchange (FPs and FNs). Then
I use a perl script that can access those folders via IMAP from the Linux
box. If you look on the SA wiki, I think there is a link to a
script. I have it set up to run automatically every few ho
Has anyone attempted to write an OCR filter (optical
character recognition) for jpg or gif files that contain spam words?
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Confidentiality Notice
If the information in this electronic communication relates to an individual pupil, it is a confidential
I’m working on getting things optimized fully in our
filter. I think the spammers have been working over time lately.
Once the message has left the linux spamassassin and
forwarded onto a mail server, say exchange or groupwise. How can I save the
message so that SA could autolearn the
Yes, I am running spamd. The process I use is:
modify rule in .cf file
spamassassin --lint -D
service spamassassin restart (to restart daemon)
Thanks for the troubleshooting tip. This is JUST what I needed.
However, I am confused as the test did hit it. =/
Thanks much.
-Original Messag
Johnson, S wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I’m on SA version 3.0.2
>
> Even to test, I set the score to 10 and sent a message with just
> “penis size” in it and it was completely missed.
>
> All of the default rules are working fine.
>
> Can anyone see any issues with that rule or point me in a direction of
>
Did you restart spamd or whatever is running
spamassassin for your mta?
Are you sure the MTA is picking up its local.cf from
the same folder in which you created your rule files?
From: Johnson, S
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 9:45
AMTo: users@spamassassin.apache.or
Hello,
I’m on SA version 3.0.2
I created a fairly extensive set of rules to hit the type
of spam we’re seeing. I prefixed the rules with a ZXC_, ZXM_ , or ZXS_
to be able to search in the maillog for the occurrence of the rules quickly.
When I run spamassassin –lint –D I see
>-Original Message-
>From: Randal, Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 11:27 AM
>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: RE: If you need proof that spammers use the same resources as
>us ...
>
>
>Jim Maul wrote:
>
>> Chris Santerre wrote:
>
>>> Hi Mr. Spammy
Jim Maul wrote:
> Chris Santerre wrote:
>> Hi Mr. Spammy!
>>
>> --Chris (I'm Al Pachino!)
>>
>>
>
> Ahem, its Pacino Mr. Santerre ;)
>
> -Jim
He spelt it like that to get past the "Pacino" spam filters ;-)
Phil
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
Chris Santerre wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Craig McLean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 10:33 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: OT?: If you need proof that spammers use the same resources as
us...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Call me
They are both called in similar fashion:
Headers Work Server:
SPAMDOPTIONS="-d -c -m20 -H"
Headers Don't Work Server:
SPAMDOPTIONS="-d -s local5 -c -m20 -H"
What is happening is that I get headers in SPAM emails from both servers.
For HAM emails, I am only getting it in the header from on
>-Original Message-
>From: Craig McLean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 10:33 AM
>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: OT?: If you need proof that spammers use the same resources as
>us...
>
>
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>Hash: SHA1
>
>Call me para
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Call me paranoid, but a few weeks back I posted a couple of rules on this
list and to the exit0 wiki which were designed to catch a common phrase
seen in many 419 spams. Notably one which catches a common "allow me to
introduce myself" style opening.
I
On Thursday 28 April 2005 09:10 am, Nestor Burma wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We are currently looking RazorGate (Mirapoint)
> appliances, for their anti-spam function.
> Has anyone of you any feedback on those boxes,
> compared to SA ? You can point us to links on the net,
> of course.
I eval'ed one at $Pr
Hello,
We are currently looking RazorGate (Mirapoint)
appliances, for their anti-spam function.
Has anyone of you any feedback on those boxes,
compared to SA ? You can point us to links on the net,
of course.
Sincerely,
NB
Probably just time to rotate your logs. It's seeing December in your
log which is forward (or future) from the current date.
Cheers,
Tremaine
On 4/27/05, John Fleming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Would someone please help me understand the problem indicated by the
> following:
>
> WARNING: ign
At 08:48 AM 4/28/2005, Geoff Manning wrote:
The local.cf file is the same on both.
There are no user_prefs files getting in the way that are altering the
behavior of the add_header (that I can see).
Where else should I look?
How is spamassassin called? Is it the same on both, or does the one that's
here is a thought for which i hope there is a solution.
I have a small (1 user - me) test smtp relay with SA3.02 et all running,
through which all mail addressed to me from our hubs (main in/out for
uni) is routed which then scans etc and then routes on to our staffmail
imap server.
I have this
I have gone ahead and made the change I asked about yesterday and it works
perfectly (on one machine only!).
We have two mail servers scanning the mail before passing it onto exchange
and one of them is adding the headers but the other isn't. I've checked
everything I can think of:
SpamAssassin v
* arnaud wrote (27/04/2005 23:06):
> Kris Deugau wrote:
>
[...]
>> In my case, for instance, SA is called from procmail just before the
>> message is written to a mailbox. In my .procmailrc file, I have a
>> number of procmail recipes that look something like this:
>>
>> # SATalk
>> :0:
>> * ^Li
Hello Joe,
Tuesday, April 26, 2005, 8:31:43 AM, you wrote:
JK> On another server or two I have disabled the auto white-list. Is
JK> this acceptable practice? Now that I am into this I recall seeing
JK> this issue before and thus decided to disable it. Comments on this
JK> practice?
My personal p
Hello Geoff,
Wednesday, April 27, 2005, 6:34:32 AM, you wrote:
GM> When I run spamassassin --lint I receive a parse error as shown
GM> belowhow do I fix it? It looks like it is the right syntax.
GM> # spamassassin --lint
GM> config: SpamAssassin failed to parse line, skipping: always_add_he
Hello ks,
Wednesday, April 27, 2005, 3:50:04 AM, you wrote:
> we're evaluating SpamAssassin 3.02 on a mail gateway on Linux. The
> mailboxes are not on this gateway but on a Lotus Notes Server to
> where the mail is forwarded. Training is done via copying mails into
> a different Mailfolder, whic
38 matches
Mail list logo
