> To up hit rate I'd recommend adding the SARE random ruleset, and the
> tripwire ruleset.
Incidentally, you'll find custom rulesets defined here:
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/CustomRulesets
Some of our ruleset writers should edit this page so it's more
current
Bret
I get the above error in the mail logs when scanning some emails. This
is 3.02 with Theo's spamd patch installed.
{^_^}
Carnegie, Martin wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> We have been using SA for the past year and a half with detection
> rates around 95% or better (based on client feedback). Over the past
> couple days (since Thursday April 21st) we have been getting lots of
> spam making it through with detection rates at
Hi all, Since I have installed Spamassassin on my windows 2000 with Exchange 2003, when I enble Spamassassin all mails are fitered. But when an e-mail is sent with Outlook or outlook Express, the e-mail is filtered and the content is blank with an winmail.dat file joinned to the mail. ca
Greetings Martin:
Use surbl.
Thank you.
At 04:18 PM 4/25/2005, you wrote:
Hi
All,
We have been using SA for the past year and a
half with detection rates around 95% or better (based on client
feedback). Over the past couple days (since Thursday April 21st) we
have been getting lots of spam ma
Title: Message
Hi
All,
We have been using
SA for the past year and a half with detection rates around 95% or better (based
on client feedback). Over the past couple days (since Thursday April 21st)
we have been getting lots of spam making it through with detection rates at
about 50%. Has
> We're running SpamAssassin 2.63 with amavisd-new-20030616-p5
> and postfix as
> a frontend to our Exchange server (yes, it all needs to be
> updated, but
> still working damn well). SA/amavisd-new tags all mail with
> scores (dropping
> stuff with scores over 20), and it's up to Exchange rules to
Kevin Roberts wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I have installed the latest spamassassin 3.02. I was wondering if
> there is any way for it to change the actual filename that it stores
> the original email message in so that I can easily sort through the
> files flagged as spam and ham?
SpamAssassin doesn
Hello all,
I have installed the latest spamassassin 3.02. I was wondering if there is
any way for it to change the actual filename that it stores the original
email message in so that I can easily sort through the files flagged as spam
and ham? Currently it uses the 20052501A105521.txt and on,
> Subject: rawlex repliccas esp. for you ashtray
are they being rude about me, or just suggesting where I should but the
repliccas ;-)
on a more serious not we need something like (?:o|aw) in the rolex rules.
--
Robert Brooks, Network Manager, Cable & Wireless UK
<[EMAIL PROTEC
Evening news arrow flew into the dojo last night. Brought this link:
http://www.ninjai.com/
(Little Ninja)
NOT WORK SAFE! Extreme animated violence, language, birds, and what appears
to be God with a katana :D (No nudity.)
12 chapters. Takes about 1.5 hours to view whole story so far. Kicks in
a
I just had a chance to (finally) get back to this issue. I tried your
suggestion, changed the mode to 0777 and re-started spamd. Apparently
nothing changed.
I did however realize that bayes tests are listed in my log file, even
though they are not in the header of the msgs.
So, I have bayes
... how did she know I like that kind of talk ?
Yes, punish me. I was a bad boy for not taking instructions from you all the
time 8-)
C-Store Hard- und Software GmbH
Christoph Peter
Düstere Straße 20
37073 Göttingen
http://www.c-store.de
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: <[EMA
From: "Mike Grice" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Mon, 2005-04-25 at 11:58 +0100, Mike Grice wrote:
> > Hi there,
> >
> > I'm running SA 3.0.2 via spamc/spamd on an Exim mail server, but I'm
> > finding I quickly run out of memory and the machine collapses into a
> > burning heap as soon as it touches s
On Mon, 2005-04-25 at 11:58 +0100, Mike Grice wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I'm running SA 3.0.2 via spamc/spamd on an Exim mail server, but I'm
> finding I quickly run out of memory and the machine collapses into a
> burning heap as soon as it touches swap.
>
> Is there a rule of thumb of how many SA
Hi there,
I'm running SA 3.0.2 via spamc/spamd on an Exim mail server, but I'm
finding I quickly run out of memory and the machine collapses into a
burning heap as soon as it touches swap.
Is there a rule of thumb of how many SA daemons to prefork to the amount
of RAM? The boxes currently have
I quite regularly get emails getting past my spam filter which seem to
contain empty zip files. I presume they were sent by viruses which failed to
incude themselves in the zip files they sent out.
These emails have the following code in base 64 which when opened as a zip
is just empty.
UEsFBg
From: "Daryl C. W. O'Shea" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Fernando S. Yépez wrote:
> > What happen if I can't add patch, what happend if I an end user? I need
to
> > wait next SA version?
> > any other solution?
> >
> > Fernando
>
> If you only want to increase the score added by your rule you could use
>
Fernando S. Yépez wrote:
What happen if I can't add patch, what happend if I an end user? I need to
wait next SA version?
any other solution?
Fernando
If you only want to increase the score added by your rule you could use
additional meta rules that depend on your actual rule to increase the
s
What happen if I can't add patch, what happend if I an end user? I need to wait next SA version?
any other solution?
Fernando
On 4/24/05, Daryl C. W. O'Shea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
jdow wrote:> From: "Theo Van Dinter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>> ...>>> OK, Theo - which of the patches is needed or ar
On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 08:29:10PM -0700, jdow wrote:
> The wording implies both are needed. ("patch" and "additional patch".)
> But the strike-out text suggests the first one is deprecated.
The second patch is all you would need. The strike-out text indeed
means the first patch was made obsolete
jdow wrote:
From: "Theo Van Dinter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
...
OK, Theo - which of the patches is needed or are both needed?
The wording implies both are needed. ("patch" and "additional patch".)
But the strike-out text suggests the first one is deprecated.
{o.o}
Theo's patch is all you need.
From: "Theo Van Dinter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
...
OK, Theo - which of the patches is needed or are both needed?
The wording implies both are needed. ("patch" and "additional patch".)
But the strike-out text suggests the first one is deprecated.
{o.o}
On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 06:51:45PM -0700, Loren Wilton wrote:
> Should be fixed in the next version. There is talk of a possible 3.0.3
> release sometime next week, and if it happens I think this will be fixed in
> that verison. If no, 3.1 shouldn't be too much longer.
FYI: This issue is covered
Should be fixed in the next version. There is talk of a possible 3.0.3
release sometime next week, and if it happens I think this will be fixed in
that verison. If no, 3.1 shouldn't be too much longer.
Loren
- Original Message -
From: "jdow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunda
25 matches
Mail list logo
