Re: OT: Do spammers have a sense of humor?

2005-04-09 Thread List Mail User
Obviously, you've never noticed contact emails at iamaspammer. com:) Paul Shupak [EMAIL PROTECTED] P.S. "Manila Industries, Inc." of Thailand provides many domains for spam support services.

Re: [SURBL-Discuss] More spams with Zdnet redirector

2005-04-09 Thread List Mail User
>... >Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2005 10:56:10 +0200 (CEST) >From: Raymond Dijkxhoorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >X-X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: "Kevin A. McGrail" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: [SURBL-Discuss] More spams with Zdnet redirector >... > >Hi! > >> Why the use of the full test rather than the uri

RE: OT: Do spammers have a sense of humor?

2005-04-09 Thread Richard.Hall
On Sat, 9 Apr 2005, Pierre Thomson wrote: > 419 spammers definitely produce humorous spams, albeit unintentionally. Indeed ... > On behalf of my widow's friend,I may wish to engage > your service [...] OTOH if they can spam us from beyond the grave, I guess we might as well all admit defeat. Th

RE: OT: Do spammers have a sense of humor?

2005-04-09 Thread Pierre Thomson
419 spammers definitely produce humorous spams, albeit unintentionally. Variations of this one come in daily: >My name is Shadak Shari, a merchant in Dubai, in the U.A.E. I have been >diagnosed with Esophageal cancer .It has defiled all forms of medical >treatment, and right now I have only ab

OT: Do spammers have a sense of humor?

2005-04-09 Thread Mark
Today I got your typical Nigerian spam. This one was different, though; it read: "I am Mrs Melissa Pointer the wife of Mr Harry Pointer, my husband" "Mr Harry Pointer" ?? LOL It seems spammers have a sense of humor, after all. :) - Mark

RE: report_safe doesn't seem to work since FC3 upgrade

2005-04-09 Thread Chris Harvey
> I upgraded to FC3 this last weekend and I just noticed today that the mail > in my junk folder are not encapsulated/wrapped like they were before. > > I checked my config file and have: > > required_hits 4.5 > rewrite_header Subject **SPAM(_SCORE_)** > report_safe 1 > use_bayes 1 > > So it see

Re: Net::DNS trouble

2005-04-09 Thread Loren Wilton
> However, I still don't know how to fix this problem. As I mentioned, I > installed Net::DNS using CPAN. When that didn't work, I also tried re- > installilng using the tarball. I tried tarballs for 0.49 and 0.48 with the > same results. Any suggestions? What version does SA think you have in

Re: WHich is better

2005-04-09 Thread Edward Shornock
Peter Marshall wrote: > I am looking for opinions. > > I have been building a new mailserver to replace my old one. > The new one has postfix, Cyrus-imap, anomy, spamassassin. I am trying > to set up the bays auto-learn stuff. Each user has a home directory > on the server (they can not log onto

Re[2]: WHich is better

2005-04-09 Thread Robert Menschel
Hello Peter, Friday, April 8, 2005, 4:24:50 AM, you wrote: PM> Hi Robert, PM> Thank you very much for your detailed reply. It was very helpful. I PM> just have one question. Why can you not run sa-learn on spam already PM> flagged as spam. ... You can. I do. My email system captures almos

Re: BAYES...sitewide or per-user or not at all?

2005-04-09 Thread Robert Menschel
Hello Gerald, Thursday, April 7, 2005, 6:58:55 PM, you wrote: GVLI> My question is, should I set up BAYES at all? Yes. User-specific if you can do it, domain-level or site-wide otherwise. GVLI> I'm fairly certain domain level BAYES would be a bad thing with GVLI> our demographic. We have people