Thanks
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 05:16:25PM -0500, Matt Kettler wrote:
> Rocky Olsen wrote:
>
> >Before i pull my hair out doing bench/resource test, i was wondering if
> >anyone out there knew if there was much of a speed/resource usage
> >difference between the following way of writing the same
Chip wrote:
Michael Parker wrote:
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 01:23:24PM -0500, Chip wrote:
I have things setup so each user has a spam folder that they will
put missed spam in. This folder will later be trained from cron
jobs using sa-learn. The problem is, it seems that sa-learn is
ignoring t
Chip wrote:
Michael Parker wrote:
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 01:23:24PM -0500, Chip wrote:
I have things setup so each user has a spam folder that they will
put missed spam in. This folder will later be trained from cron
jobs using sa-learn. The problem is, it seems that sa-learn is
ignoring t
Rocky Olsen wrote:
>Before i pull my hair out doing bench/resource test, i was wondering if
>anyone out there knew if there was much of a speed/resource usage
>difference between the following way of writing the same rule.
>
>
>Method A:
>body rule_a /(?:feh|meh|bleh)/i
>
>vs.
>
>Method
Jim Maul wrote:
>
>>
>
> umm what is masses/config file?
That's the configuration file for the mass-check tools. They impact the
perceptron when evolving scoresets (advanced stuff)
>
> You should only be changing scores in local.cf
>
> something like:
>
> score RULE_NAME_HERE VALUE_HERE
>
> ie:
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 10:12:38PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Has someone tested Mysql 5.0 with SA3.0?
>
Yes. Are you just asking? or did you find some sort of problem?
I haven't found any problems so far, but all of my testing has been
focused on BayesSQL.
Michael
pgpt1rIyLXb2C.p
Hello
Has someone tested Mysql 5.0 with SA3.0?
Lisheng Sun wrote:
Hi,
I try to re-assign score, in masses/config file:
SCORESET=3
HAM_PREFERENCE=2.0
THRESHOLD=5.0
EPOCHS=100
NOTE=
What the SCORESET here mean? Do i need to change the HAM_PREFERENCE,
THRESHOLD and EPOCHS value?
Thanks.
umm what is masses/config file?
You should only be changin
Hi,
I try to re-assign score, in masses/config file:
SCORESET=3
HAM_PREFERENCE=2.0
THRESHOLD=5.0
EPOCHS=100
NOTE=
What the SCORESET here mean? Do i need to change the HAM_PREFERENCE,
THRESHOLD and EPOCHS value?
Thanks.
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 02:24:23PM -0500, Chip wrote:
> Ahh ok. Make sense! I will change to a sql backend, as my users have
> no shell access and can't run the command as themselves. Thanks for the
> clarification!
Not a bad idea. The Bayes SQL modules have proven to be stable and in
most c
Michael Parker wrote:
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 01:23:24PM -0500, Chip wrote:
I have things setup so each user has a spam folder that they will put
missed spam in. This folder will later be trained from cron jobs using
sa-learn. The problem is, it seems that sa-learn is ignoring the -u /
--us
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 01:23:24PM -0500, Chip wrote:
> I have things setup so each user has a spam folder that they will put
> missed spam in. This folder will later be trained from cron jobs using
> sa-learn. The problem is, it seems that sa-learn is ignoring the -u /
> --user= flag. No mat
Please forgive me if this is in the archives; I'm having trouble finding it.
I've just finished training my Bayes DB using sa-learn (perversely, when I
was trying to collect 200 spam messages, the spammers decided to stop
sending to me). Now that the DB is usable, it's interesting that while most
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
>Hello all
>
>Can someone tell me how i can redirect the output from the command:
>spamassassin --lint
>to a file or maybe grep / awk
>
>spamassassin --lint | grep something
>does not work!
>
>I want to autmate the checks of all rules
>
>bruno
>
>
Ahh, system admin 2
Anyone know why the /etc/mail/spamassassin
and /usr/local/share/spamassassin stuff isn't being included in
the .packlist? I realize that there might be some concern about them
being removed if the package is uninstalled (unlikely) but its also kind
of against everything for which the .packlist sta
Hello all
Can someone tell me how i can redirect the output from the command:
spamassassin --lint
to a file or maybe grep / awk
spamassassin --lint | grep something
does not work!
I want to autmate the checks of all rules
bruno
>> The problem is, it seems that sa-learn is ignoring the -u / --user= flag.
(B>
(B> Of course it's ignoring it. There is no -u flag in sa-learn. ONLY spamc
(B> and spamd accept that flag.
(B>
(B> sa-learn uses the userid of the user that calls it. Period.
(B
(B>From TFM:
(B
(B-u username,
My bad, apparently 3.0.2 and 3.0.1 do have such a flag in sa-learn. I
was looking at the 3.0.0 version, which does not.
Matt Kettler wrote:
>Chip wrote:
>
>
>
>>The problem is, it seems that sa-learn is ignoring the -u / --user= flag.
>>
>>
>
>Of course it's ignoring it. There is no -u flag
Matt Kettler wrote:
Chip wrote:
The problem is, it seems that sa-learn is ignoring the -u / --user= flag.
Of course it's ignoring it. There is no -u flag in sa-learn. ONLY spamc
and spamd accept that flag.
sa-learn uses the userid of the user that calls it. Period.
man sa-learn says diff
Chip wrote:
> The problem is, it seems that sa-learn is ignoring the -u / --user= flag.
Of course it's ignoring it. There is no -u flag in sa-learn. ONLY spamc
and spamd accept that flag.
sa-learn uses the userid of the user that calls it. Period.
I recently installed SA 3.0.2 on freeBSD 4.10, and it's working great,
except for this one feature:
I have things setup so each user has a spam folder that they will put
missed spam in. This folder will later be trained from cron jobs using
sa-learn. The problem is, it seems that sa-learn is
At 09:07 AM 3/31/2005, Arvinn Løkkebakken wrote:
You have a broken trust path. ALL_TRUSTED should *never* match email
from outside your network.
But it does anyway, even when trust path is set correctly:
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2508
Hmm. Well, that happens if and only if
Alan Shine wrote:
Hi,
I have a few questuions regrding the benefit/use of SA fatures.
1. Can Pyzord run localy as SURBL does with rbldnsd (check the
message with local repository, not with the Pyzor web servers) ?
See: http://pyzor.sourceforge.net/
Since the entire system is released under the G
Matt Kettler wrote:
You have a broken trust path. ALL_TRUSTED should *never* match email
from outside your network.
But it does anyway, even when trust path is set correctly:
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2508
Happens when spamassassin fails to parse the Received header(s)
On 3/30/2005 10:15 PM +0100, Chris Santerre wrote:
For those of you who don't know, there is a group of ppl that lead 419
scammers on wild goose chases. One of the things they do is request pics for
proof. THey have them do some funny stuff. (Bread and fish on head)
This came accross my mail today.
Nigerian scams are evolving...
I just received that one with only 3 rules matching (SA 2.6)...
BAYES_90 2.10, RCVD_IN_SBL 1.11, RCVD_IN_SORBS 0.10
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from vsmtp1.tin.it (vsmtp1.tin.it [212.216.176.141])
by (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j2V3snX802038
i wrote something similar to this but instead of of using .+, i used [^>]+,
supposedly a tad faster, iirc. also writing s?(?:<.+>)? as
(?:s(?:<[^>]+)?)? should be slightly faster cause if it fails to match on
the 's' it won't move on to check for the
-Rocky
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 11:35:26AM +0
> I'm running Spamassassin 3.0.2 on Linux in front of Oracle Collaboration
> Suite.
> I am using proxsmtp(http://memberwebs.com/nielsen/software/proxsmtp/) to
> scan
> mail and then pass it along to oracle.
>
> My question is...
>
> I know that you can have spamassassin exit with a non-zero code i
http://getpornodvd.com
This looks like an effective way of getting round URIRBLs (though of
course it requires the end user to cut and paste).
The rule below seems to catch the technique. Any suggestions for
improving it or any other rules to suggest?
# 2005-03-31 new rule
rawbody local_OBFU_H
Hurray and... can't wait
--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300
Chris Santerre wrote:
Too much traffic used for a file no longer updated. BigEvil has been
removed. I shall replace it with our newest ruleset soon. Its a real corker
;)
Chris Sante
On Wednesday 30 March 2005 08:02 pm, Robert Menschel wrote:
> Hello Bill,
>
> Wednesday, March 30, 2005, 8:15:05 AM, you wrote:
>
> B> I'm running Spamassassin 3.0.2 on Linux in front of Oracle Collaboration
> Suite. B> I am using
> B> proxsmtp(http://memberwebs.com/nielsen/software/proxsmtp/) to s
Hi,
I have a few questuions regrding the benefit/use of SA fatures.
1. Can Pyzord run localy as SURBL does with rbldnsd (check the message with local repository, not with the Pyzor web servers) ?
2.I would like to activate more features to SA (I currently use only SARE rules).
We are conside
Hello Bill,
Wednesday, March 30, 2005, 8:15:05 AM, you wrote:
B> I'm running Spamassassin 3.0.2 on Linux in front of Oracle Collaboration
Suite.
B> I am using
B> proxsmtp(http://memberwebs.com/nielsen/software/proxsmtp/) to scan
B> mail and then pass it along to oracle.
B> My question is...
B
Before i pull my hair out doing bench/resource test, i was wondering if
anyone out there knew if there was much of a speed/resource usage
difference between the following way of writing the same rule.
Method A:
bodyrule_a /(?:feh|meh|bleh)/i
vs.
Method B:
bod __rule_a
Michael Bellears wrote:
"I'm using 3.0.2 on a debian woody box. Its from www.backports.org
(great site)"
Ok, so you're using Spamassassin 3.0.2 on Debian. Are you
using Sendmail, qmail, courier, or postfix? I honestly don't
know that Debian uses as a default mailserver.
Exim.
Ok
> > "I'm using 3.0.2 on a debian woody box. Its from www.backports.org
> > (great site)"
> >
> Ok, so you're using Spamassassin 3.0.2 on Debian. Are you
> using Sendmail, qmail, courier, or postfix? I honestly don't
> know that Debian uses as a default mailserver.
Exim.
Matthew Lenz wrote:
- Original Message - From: "AltGrendel"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 8:50 PM
Subject: Re: my girlfriend is getting ticked :)
Mike Jackson wrote:
Your bayes database looked to be reasonably trained. The
false-negative was labeled 99% spam by Bayes.
I don't see
On Wednesday, March 30, 2005, 2:21:01 PM, Matthew Lenz wrote:
> I just installed backports perl-libnet-dns (.48, hope that is new
> enough .49 is the newest). Is there anywhere I can check to see if
> 'network tests' (what the SURBL says needs to be enabled) are enabled?
Set your trust path corre
- Original Message -
From: "AltGrendel"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 8:50 PM
Subject: Re: my girlfriend is getting ticked :)
Mike Jackson wrote:
Your bayes database looked to be reasonably trained. The false-negative
was labeled 99% spam by Bayes.
I don't see any RBL checks, w
On Wednesday, March 30, 2005, 2:20:17 PM, Mike Jackson wrote:
>> Your bayes database looked to be reasonably trained. The false-negative
>> was labeled 99% spam by Bayes.
>>
>> I don't see any RBL checks, which might have made the difference on this
>> one, if it's already been seen and flagged.
Mike Jackson wrote:
Your bayes database looked to be reasonably trained. The
false-negative was labeled 99% spam by Bayes.
I don't see any RBL checks, which might have made the difference on
this one, if it's already been seen and flagged. Do you have
Net::DNS installed and the RLB tests enab
Matthew Lenz wrote:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_99,HTML_80_90,
HTML_FONT_BIG,HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_TITLE_EMPTY,MIME_HTML_ONLY,
MSGID_FROM_MTA_ID autolearn=no version=3.0.2
I see your false negative scored 99% on bayes. The BAYES_99 rule has a
much lower score
- From 'man spamd':
- -m num, --max-children=num Allow maximum num children
Just set that as desired in your script that starts up the spamd daemon.
HAHAHA!! OMG, I was looking at the wrong man file. ^_^;; Thanks
for the help.
> Can someone expand on the ClamAV detecting phishing attempts. Or direct
> me some where?
Pick up some of the SARE rulesets. I think spoof or fraud is the one that
contains an assortment of phishhooks. Won't get 'em all, but will sure cut
down on the more common ones.
Loren
> I am thinking of downloading rules from SARE.
> However, I am told that some or many of the
> rules have already been incorporated into 3.0.2
>
> Can someone recommend the best approach to
> avoid duplicates ?
Sure. Read the docs on the SARE rules page relating to each ruleset. We
document whi
45 matches
Mail list logo
