I have been trying to get something from CVS for several days now, no luck.
Send me your email in private ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) to send it to you.
Bayes needs constant training, but this doesn't mean it needs any manual
training. Once it's up and running and "well-greased" it should take care
of
its
On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 10:23:37PM +, Paul Reilly wrote:
>
> > Of course, I have to ask, how do you find the data "quite useful?" I
>
> It's useful to see what words/tokens are getting high scores.
> The bayes database on one of my machines seems to be not
> as accurate as the others, and re
> Of course, I have to ask, how do you find the data "quite useful?" I
It's useful to see what words/tokens are getting high scores.
The bayes database on one of my machines seems to be not
as accurate as the others, and results in msgs through that
machine are getting a negative bayes scoring.
Norman Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote on 03/14/2005 03:29:25 PM:
> debug: bayes: Not available for scanning, only 0 spam(s) in Bayes
DB < 200
You need to teach Bayes at least 200 spam and 200
non-spam messages before it will do anything for you.
Andy
-Original Message-
From: Ben Wylie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 14 March 2005 13:28
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: save debug output and errors
>
> Having managed to capture the errors which pop up when my mailserver runs
> the spamassassin batch script, it is coming up
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Should be
/var/lib/amavis/var/.spamassassin/bayes
surely (the final "/bayes" is not a path but rather a filename prefix)
I have changed
bayes_path /var/lib/amavis/var/.spamassassin/bayes
but I still see the "Not avilable for scanning". Am I missing something?
Regards,
Norma
Norman Zhang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When I run amavisd debug-sa, I see the following. Is my SA bayes
> misconfigured? May I ask for a few pointers?
> bayes_path /var/lib/amavis/var/.spamassassin
Should be
/var/lib/amavis/var/.spamassassin/bayes
surely (the final "/bayes" is not a path but rather a fil
Hi,
When I run amavisd debug-sa, I see the following. Is my SA bayes
misconfigured? May I ask for a few pointers?
Regards,
Norman Zhang
debug: bayes: Not available for scanning, only 0 spam(s) in Bayes DB < 200
required_hits 5
rewrite_header Subject [SPAM]
report_safe 0
skip_rbl_checks 0
bayes_pa
At 02:53 PM 3/14/2005, S M.C Butler wrote:
>1) what does this have to do with the thread "Re: Bayes DB does not grow
>anymore"?
>
oops I replied to that mail to get the mailing list address and forgot to
delete the inline text, sorry about that.
Even if you did remove the inline text, it's still go
At 02:50 PM 3/14/2005, Russell P. Sutherland wrote:
Is it possible to use the spamc/spamd pair
by invoking spamc with a per instance refernence
to a list of customized local.cf files?
No, local.cf level files are parsed only at the start of spamd. By the time
spamc is called, it's too late.
I wo
>
>1) what does this have to do with the thread "Re: Bayes DB does not grow
>anymore"?
>
oops I replied to that mail to get the mailing list address and forgot to
delete the inline text, sorry about that.
>2) man fetchmail
thx, I'll check it out.
Is it possible to use the spamc/spamd pair
by invoking spamc with a per instance refernence
to a list of customized local.cf files?
I would like to have different rules on a per
destination domain basis. Is this possible?
--
Quist ConsultingEmail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
219 Donlea Dri
At 02:20 PM 3/14/2005, S M.C Butler wrote:
Hi, I would like to have my mail forwarded to my ISP's account and then
popped to my server where I can run spam assassin and finally popped a
second time to my PC. How do I get this 2-level pop mechanism going? How can
I pop from my ISP account to my serv
Hi, I would like to have my mail forwarded to my ISP's account and then
popped to my server where I can run spam assassin and finally popped a
second time to my PC. How do I get this 2-level pop mechanism going? How can
I pop from my ISP account to my server in a way that will allow me to do a
sec
Ok so how would I use this with all of my .out files. When I run it
by itself it prints Date Status Score
but nothing else even when in the folder with all of the .out files.
When I attempt to give it a file to parse "reportparse.pl *.out) it
gives me the below errors
C:\ESA>reportparse.pl
Date
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Eric A. Hall writes:
> On 3/14/2005 12:32 PM, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
>
> > There's no need to do your lookups more than once. Save the results the
> > first time you do the lookups/processing.
> >
> > See the SPF.pm plugin for a good example.
>
At 01:11 PM 3/14/2005, Michael Parker wrote:
In general, no it's not possible to dump the bayesian tokens in a
readable (well they are readable, it's just hard to read them :))
format, unless you do a little work yourself. It is possible to dump
them by making use the the given plugin hooks that a
Matt Florido wrote:
Here's a good article for ports needed by Razor/Pyzor/DCC.
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/NetTestFirewallIssues
Thanks for the URL. I'm not too faimiliar with IPTables. I just allow
outgoing UPD/6277 for DCC and outgoing TCP/2703 for Razor. I don't have
any DCC server set
On 3/14/2005 12:32 PM, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
> There's no need to do your lookups more than once. Save the results the
> first time you do the lookups/processing.
>
> See the SPF.pm plugin for a good example.
Oh right, it's persistent. Duh.
Thanks
--
Eric A. Hall
On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 04:46:06PM +, Paul Reilly wrote:
>
> Is it possible to dump the bayesian tokens in
> human readable format still? It was quite useful
> but since 3.0.x they seen to be base64 encoded or
> some other way encoded. I couldn't see any sa-learn
> option, or any FAQ entry abo
Matt Kettler wrote:
You can't train SA on most messages from Eudora's .mbx files. Speaking
as a user of eudora, eudora completely destroys many important parts of
a message when it stores it in the mbox, and it cannot be reconstructed.
And this was the main reason that after using Eudora for 8 ye
Eric A. Hall wrote:
It seems that the plugin architecture only allows a single pass/fail
result, so if you want to have multiple tests with different shades of
results, you have to call the plugin multiple times. Is that right?
Over the weekend I banged together a preliminary ldapBlacklist.pm plugi
It seems that the plugin architecture only allows a single pass/fail
result, so if you want to have multiple tests with different shades of
results, you have to call the plugin multiple times. Is that right?
Over the weekend I banged together a preliminary ldapBlacklist.pm plugin
which lets the m
Thanks. Glad I havn't started feeding it yet. So what I need to do is
look at the attachments and then save then to a file then train on that.
correct? That makes sense. Maybe that is why my old SA instance got
kinda weird in the end.
Thanks
Matt Kettler wrote:
Well, first, if you aren't stripp
At 11:52 AM 3/14/2005, Andreas Rust wrote:
we are mostly using Eudora (Windows version) and it's saving "Junk" emails
(as junked by Eudora itself) into
an .mbx file.
You can't train SA on most messages from Eudora's .mbx files. Speaking as a
user of eudora, eudora completely destroys many impor
Chris
updated the rules_du_jour, removed the new defs from myrdj and things
work now.
--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300
Chris Thielen wrote:
Hi Martin,
Martin Hepworth wrote:
Matt
myrdj not downloading the files as it can't get the file s
At 11:46 AM 3/14/2005, Paul Reilly wrote:
Is it possible to dump the bayesian tokens in
human readable format still?
No.
In sa 3.0+ they are base-64 encodings of the SHA1 hash of the token. The
hash is for all practical purposes not reversible.
This is done in part for privacy.. examining the tex
Hello,
we are mostly using Eudora (Windows version) and it's saving "Junk" emails
(as junked by Eudora itself) into
an .mbx file.
Eventhough the .mbx file looks like an ok-formatted mbox file, it carries:
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 18 15:28:02 2005
Infront of the normal headers.
Such as:
From
At 11:22 AM 3/14/2005, ChupaCabra wrote:
I just noticed that some of my users are attaching multiple spams in one
email to my "spam" user for training. Aside from having to have 200
spam/ham mails and the possibiliy of the messages being too large, would
this have an effect on training?
Well, f
Is it possible to dump the bayesian tokens in
human readable format still? It was quite useful
but since 3.0.x they seen to be base64 encoded or
some other way encoded. I couldn't see any sa-learn
option, or any FAQ entry about it.
Thanks
Paul
Hi Martin,
Martin Hepworth wrote:
Matt
myrdj not downloading the files as it can't get the file sizes for
some reason...
Can you give me the error messages? I just downloaded the new
evilnumbers using RDJ 1.19 (which I just uploaded) and it went off
without a hitch. I use curl (not wget), by
Matt Yackley wrote:
Hi all,
I've released a new version of evilnumbers and there are several
changes in the new
version.
RulesDuJour:
A new version of RDJ will be released soon to handle these changes,
but here is a
manual fix.
I've updated RDJ with the new names for evilnumbers. There are n
I just noticed that some of my users are attaching multiple spams in one
email to my "spam" user for training. Aside from having to have 200
spam/ham mails and the possibiliy of the messages being too large, would
this have an effect on training?
Thanks.
--
Michael H. Collins Admiral, Penguin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am 14.03.2005 um 07:54 Uhr haben Sie geschrieben:
hi all
is anyone using a tool that can parse "/var/log/messages" to find
identified SPAM and is able to then build MTRG graphs ?
I use Mailgraph
http://people.ee.ethz.ch/~dws/software/mailgraph/
I use Mailgraph to.
Works ve
On Thursday, February 17, 2005, 4:46:28 PM, Jeff Chan wrote:
> IMO The correct answer is for eBay not to have an open redirector
> or for them to protect it better, for example as Matthew suggests.
> We could ask them follow the lead of other redirection sites and
> use SURBLs to check the URIs:
GRP Productions wrote on Mon, 14 Mar 2005 03:41:40 +0200:
> Indeed, this is the CVS version :-)
I have been trying to get something from CVS for several days now, no luck.
> This is perhaps because I have been using only 'mistake-based' training (ie
> training only when false classificaiton ha
Message Partners has launched a free edition of our Message Processing
Platform (MPP) for those who want to use SpamAssassin and ClamAV with
Sendmail, QMail, Postfix, CGPro or SurgeMail email servers. MPP Free
Edition includes our comprehensive Webmin module, most of the features
of MPP-LE and
At 10:54 PM Sunday, 3/13/2005, ip.guy wrote -=>
is anyone using a tool that can parse "/var/log/messages" to find
identified SPAM and is able to then build MTRG graphs ?
i was using a tool that could do this a while ago but have totally
forgotten the name of the project
any help appreciated
Hav
> > where should I look for this to fix?
>
> Theo has the answer for that one - a bad meta rule somewhere.
>
> Given that --lint seemingly didn't catch it, and this pure perl error is
> less than descriptive of the problem, once you find the rule in question,
> I think it deserves a Bugzilla entry
I upgraded from 2.64 to 3.0.2 via CPAN with no problems.
Yes, I read
http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.0.x/dist/UPGRADE
und did change my local.cf.
1) Now Mail don't get tagged as spam
==
/va/log/mail
Mar 14 12:34:33 ns spamd[27959]: connection from localhost.localdomain
[127.0.0.1] at po
Am 14.03.2005 um 07:54 Uhr haben Sie geschrieben:
> hi all
>
> is anyone using a tool that can parse "/var/log/messages" to find
> identified SPAM and is able to then build MTRG graphs ?
I use Mailgraph
http://people.ee.ethz.ch/~dws/software/mailgraph/
it uses the RRD to store the data.
Lars
Matt
myrdj not downloading the files as it can't get the file sizes for some
reason...
--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300
Matt Yackley wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
I've released a new version of evilnumbers and th
...
>Its part of a larger quote, to the effect that someone with one clock is
>sure of the time, someone withe two clocks isn't and I forget what is
>supposed to happen as you get more clocks. Maybe you get back closer to the
>assurance you had with a single cheap windup clock. I originally came
ip.guy wrote:
hi all
is anyone using a tool that can parse "/var/log/messages" to find
identified SPAM and is able to then build MTRG graphs ?
i was using a tool that could do this a while ago but have totally
forgotten the name of the project
any help appreciated
I've used graphdefang in conju
> where should I look for this to fix?
Theo has the answer for that one - a bad meta rule somewhere.
Given that --lint seemingly didn't catch it, and this pure perl error is
less than descriptive of the problem, once you find the rule in question, I
think it deserves a Bugzilla entry for failure
You've checked the obvious? There is an X-Spam-Level header, and it does
have a bunch of asterisks?
Loren
>...
>From: "List Mail User" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>> > ...The person with two clocks is never really sure of
>> > the current time.
>>
>> OT, but... above - *not* a good quote, but it sounds nice)
>> To be `sure' of the time, you need at least three clocks (look at the
>> documentat
hi all
is anyone using a tool that can parse "/var/log/messages" to find
identified SPAM and is able to then build MTRG graphs ?
i was using a tool that could do this a while ago but have totally
forgotten the name of the project
any help appreciated
On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 05:03:05AM -, Ben Wylie wrote:
> Scalar found where operator expected at (eval 57) line 724, near "} $self"
> (Missing operator before $self?)
> Failed to run meta SpamAssassin tests, skipping some: syntax error at (eval
> 57)
> line 724, near "} $self"
>
> whe
On Sun, 2005-03-13 at 20:03 -0800, Norman Zhang wrote:
> > Did you run "razor-admin -create" after installing razor? It will create
> > the razor-conf and *.lst files. You will want to do this as the user
> > that runs amavisd (typically, amavis or vscan). Given where amavisd is
> > looking for the
-Original Message-
> From: Loren Wilton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 14 March 2005 02:36
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: save debug output and errors
>
> You probably have some broken rules or other lines in your local rules
> file, or possibly elsewhere in the rul
I upgraded to 3.02 and everything is working fine except for one thing... I
always put spam from all users into the /var/mail directory with the
following lines in procmailrc
:0:
* ^X-Spam-Level: \*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*
/var/mail/spam
After reading the new doc, I also added this line to the top of pr
Did you run "razor-admin -create" after installing razor? It will create
the razor-conf and *.lst files. You will want to do this as the user
that runs amavisd (typically, amavis or vscan). Given where amavisd is
looking for the razor files, I would guess you may also need to use the
"-home" option
On Sun, 2005-03-13 at 19:12 -0800, Norman Zhang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When I run
>
> # amavisd debug-sa
>
> I see the following errors. Do I need to crate the missing files
> manually? May I ask for a few pointers?
>
> Regards,
> Norman Zhang
>
> Razor-Log: No /var/lib/amavis/var/.razor/razor-age
Hi,
When I run
# amavisd debug-sa
I see the following errors. Do I need to crate the missing files
manually? May I ask for a few pointers?
Regards,
Norman Zhang
Razor-Log: No /var/lib/amavis/var/.razor/razor-agent.conf found, skipping.
Razor-Log: No razor-agent.conf found, using defaults.
check[9
Bill Randle wrote:
I don't have rcddc either. With SpamAssassin, use dccifd as previously
mentioned. Once you edited the dcc_conf file to enable DCCIFD, start it
using the init program:
# /etc/init.d/dccd start
Thanks. dccifd did start. However, I'm seeing the following error message,
dccif
You probably have some broken rules or other lines in your local rules file,
or possibly elsewhere in the rules files. To catch thos you want to run
"spamassassin --lint" without the debug stuff. This will give you a
managable output.
Assuming you are on NT of some flavor, "spamassassin 2>&1
>o
> > ...The person with two clocks is never really sure of
> > the current time.
>
> OT, but... above - *not* a good quote, but it sounds nice)
> To be `sure' of the time, you need at least three clocks (look at the
> documentation for ntp/ntpd).
Its part of a larger quote, to the eff
That's okay, the problem just is one cannot be sure how accurate it is.
Knowing
that you use MS would have been useful, anyway :-)
(BTW: my version of Mailwatch can't show this, do you use a CVS version?)
Indeed, this is the CVS version :-)
See the number of tokens, we have ten times yours with le
Hello All,
This is the first time I have used this list so if should have done it a
different way, or have said something wrong, I beg your forgiveness.
I have been running spamassassin for over a year now on my Windows 2003
system using perl 5.6.1. My SA version is 3.0.2.
I run Spamassassin from
GRP Productions wrote on Mon, 14 Mar 2005 00:32:42 +0200:
> You are right, I am using MailWatch. I just posted this output to be easy
> for one to see the actual dates without having to convert.
That's okay, the problem just is one cannot be sure how accurate it is. Knowing
that you use MS woul
61 matches
Mail list logo
