That is the output of --dump magic? I haven't ever seen it formatted that
nicely. I assume you skipped the first line, but there's also missing the
expire atime delta. So, where do you got this from? Not directly from
sa-learn
--dump magic I'd say. You are running SA thru some interface? You shoul
GRP Productions wrote on Sun, 13 Mar 2005 22:54:22 +0200:
> Perhaps I have not been clear enough. It's not only that the files' size is
> constant. I am pasting the output of dump magic,
That is the output of --dump magic? I haven't ever seen it formatted that
nicely. I assume you skipped the f
From: "List Mail User" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > ...The person with two clocks is never really sure of
> > the current time.
>
> OT, but... above - *not* a good quote, but it sounds nice)
> To be `sure' of the time, you need at least three clocks (look at the
> documentation for ntp/n
From: "David Suen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Hi all, I installed spam assassin (3.0.2) in my linux box and looks like
> does not work (probably due to my configuration). I tried RTFM but still
> cannot make it work.
>
> Situation:
> I use spamassassin with simscan + qmail. My problem is when I use th
This doesn't prove anything. sa-learn --dump magic shows you what's inside.
Also, Bayes is not a checksum system like Razor, that's its strength. If
you
learn something to it that means that it extracts tokens (short pieces)
from
the message and adjusts its internal probability for them being ham
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
I've released a new version of evilnumbers and there are several changes in the
new
version.
Ruleset name change:
In order to get this old setup in line with current SARE standards the name of
the
ruleset has changed from evilnumbers.cf to
It would probably help if I explained that I brought up two
different but related ides in quick succession:
1. Asking for URI domains of messages sent through zombies, open
relays, open proxies, etc. detected by XBL that mentioned SURBL URIs.
2. Asking for URI domains of messages sent through z
On Sunday, March 13, 2005, 8:07:47 AM, List User wrote:
> I think it would be useful, *but* Spamhaus is very good at adding
> IPs of sites that exploit the XBL - So you would see a significant overlap.
> [...] And, SURBLs are RHS lists, so you will catch IP jumping that
> the SBL often mis
...
On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 05:29:04 -0800, Jeff Chan wrote:
>On Sunday, March 13, 2005, 5:12:30 AM, Jeff Chan wrote:
>> On Friday, March 11, 2005, 11:27:52 PM, Jeff Chan wrote:
>>> Does anyone have or know about a list of spam-advertised URIs
>>> where the spam they appeared in was sent through open r
On Sunday, March 13, 2005, 7:31:01 AM, Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote:
>> I'm not asking for trap data. I'm asking to look for XBL hits,
>> then take the URIs from messages that hit XBL. In other words
>> I want to get the sites that are being advertised through
>> exploited hosts.
>>
>> Nothing to do
On Sunday, March 13, 2005, 5:36:55 AM, Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote:
> Hi!
>>> Perhaps some kind person could write a reporting function in
>>> SpamAssassin for this?
>> Hmm, perhaps if we could extract *all* URI domains from messages
>> sent through XBLed senders then prioritize those say by frequen
> ...The person with two clocks is never really sure of
> the current time.
OT, but... above - *not* a good quote, but it sounds nice)
To be `sure' of the time, you need at least three clocks (look at the
documentation for ntp/ntpd).
>
> ...
...
Paul Shupak
Jeff Chan wrote on Sun, 13 Mar 2005 05:12:30 -0800:
> One fairly easy for anyone running a large SpamAssassin
> installation to help us get this data would be to simply grep
> for "XBL" and "SURBL" rules hitting the same message and report
> out the URI domains from those messages.
>
I have a
Hi all, I installed spam assassin (3.0.2) in my linux box and looks like
does not work (probably due to my configuration). I tried RTFM but still
cannot make it work.
Situation:
I use spamassassin with simscan + qmail. My problem is when I use the
spamassassin (not spamc) + sample-spam.txt it give
wrote on Sun, 13 Mar 2005 01:57:18 -0300:
> So, I redirect those messages to me and I received them as no spam again!
>
As I just wrote to "GRP Productions": Bayes doesn't work this way.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
GRP Productions wrote on Sun, 13 Mar 2005 11:21:12 +0200:
> for some days now my bayesian DB does not seem to grow. Its size remains
> stable. It is read with no problems by SA 3.0.2, but nothing new is written.
> I send an email to me, it is classified as BAYES_50. I sa-learn it as spam,
> sen
On Sunday, March 13, 2005, 5:12:30 AM, Jeff Chan wrote:
> On Friday, March 11, 2005, 11:27:52 PM, Jeff Chan wrote:
>> Does anyone have or know about a list of spam-advertised URIs
>> where the spam they appeared in was sent through open relays,
>> zombies, open proxies, etc. In other words does an
On Friday, March 11, 2005, 11:27:52 PM, Jeff Chan wrote:
> Does anyone have or know about a list of spam-advertised URIs
> where the spam they appeared in was sent through open relays,
> zombies, open proxies, etc. In other words does anyone know
> of a list of spamvertised web sites or their doma
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&ncid=738&e=1&u=/nm/20050311/tc_nm/tech_spyware_dc
FTC Says Anti-Spyware Vendor Shut Down
Fri Mar 11, 4:31 PM ET
[...]
The makers of Spyware Assassin tried to scare consumers into
buying software through pop-up ads and e-mail that warned their
computers h
> Jens Ahlin wrote:
>> When trying to build rpm using rpmbuild -tb
>> Mail-SpamAssassin-3.0.2.tar.gz
>> fails with
>> error: Failed build dependencies:
>> perl(Digest::SHA1) is needed by spamassassin-3.0.2-1
>> perl(HTML::Parser) is needed by spamassassin-3.0.2-1
>>
>> After install
Hello,
for some days now my bayesian DB does not seem to grow. Its size remains
stable. It is read with no problems by SA 3.0.2, but nothing new is written.
I send an email to me, it is classified as BAYES_50. I sa-learn it as spam,
send it again, and it is still BAYES_50 (I expected to see it as
Bob Proulx wrote:
Jens Ahlin wrote:
When trying to build rpm using rpmbuild -tb Mail-SpamAssassin-3.0.2.tar.gz
fails with
error: Failed build dependencies:
perl(Digest::SHA1) is needed by spamassassin-3.0.2-1
perl(HTML::Parser) is needed by spamassassin-3.0.2-1
After installing the
At 20:15 -0800 03/06/2005, Vicki Brown wrote:
>I can create a user rule for mail not addressed (To or Cc) to me
>
> header CF_NOT_FOR_METoCc !~ /[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
> score CF_NOT_FOR_ME 4.0
> describe CF_NOT_FOR_ME Neither To nor Cc me
>
>However, the still-not-a
Jens Ahlin wrote:
> When trying to build rpm using rpmbuild -tb Mail-SpamAssassin-3.0.2.tar.gz
> fails with
> error: Failed build dependencies:
> perl(Digest::SHA1) is needed by spamassassin-3.0.2-1
> perl(HTML::Parser) is needed by spamassassin-3.0.2-1
>
> After installing these m
Citando Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> At 11:57 PM 3/12/2005, you wrote:
> >So, I redirect those messages to me and I received them as no spam again!
>
> Define exactly what you mean by "redirect those messages". What specific
> actions did you do?
I used redirect tool from webmail (hord
On Sat, 2005-03-12 at 19:07 -0800, Norman Zhang wrote:
> > I also uncommented the DCCIFD_ARGS line.
>
> # used to start dccifd
> # a common value is
> # DCCIFD_ARGS="-SHELO -Smail_host -SSender -SList-ID"
> DCCIFD_ARGS=
>
> My DCCIFD_ARGS is empty. Should I add the options that is shown above
Hi everyone!
Probably I'm doing a stupid question... but, anyway, here it go:
I saved in a folder some messages that I received classified as no spam. So, i
run these command:
sa-learn --spam
So I take the following :
Learned from 2 message(s) (3 message(s) examined).
So, I redirect those messa
My dcc on RedHat 8.0 is located in
/var/dcc directory
You should see DCCIFD there as well.
I had to change a line in the /var/dcc/dcc_conf to
DCCIFD_ENABLE=ON
Also, make sure you install the latest DCC with DCCIFD from the Rayolite
website (if you do not have it).
Put the path to DCC in your
At 10:07 PM 3/12/2005, Norman Zhang wrote:
Someone pointed out to me I should look for rcdcc, but I only have
# slocate cdcc
/usr/bin/cdcc
I'm not too familiar with the scripts that come with DCC for this.. I just
wrote my own init script to start dccifd.
Should I use this instead? BTW do I need
On Saturday 12 March 2005 02:47 pm, jdow wrote:
> The canonical way to do it is something like:
>
> rewrite_header Subject *SPAM* _SCORE(00)_ **
>
> That gives headers that look like:
> Subject: *SPAM* 027.3 ** spoo is best for slow sex
The OP was interested in header tagging,
>...
>Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2005 18:46:52 -0500
>From: "Eric A. Hall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206)
>X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: Re: SA addr tests need to be updated
>References: <[EMAIL PROTE
I also uncommented the DCCIFD_ARGS line.
# used to start dccifd
# a common value is
# DCCIFD_ARGS="-SHELO -Smail_host -SSender -SList-ID"
DCCIFD_ARGS=
My DCCIFD_ARGS is empty. Should I add the options that is shown above?
Was there a dccd file created in /etc/init.d as part of the
installation
32 matches
Mail list logo
