Cris Fuhrman wrote on Sun, 20 Feb 2005 14:23:33 -0500:
> I think our sysadmins (and I'm sure they're not unique) don't have
> enough time to feed ham/spam to the B. filters. Given the
> effectiveness of SpamPal's simple approach, it seems to me that the
> return on investment for correct Bayesi
Hello,
First off, let me say that I'm an indirect user of SpamAssassin, and
have great respect for the time and engergy that has been put into
developing and deploying it.
At my day job, our sysadmins have been using SpamAssassin for over a
year. I'm not sure they feed it ham/spam as needed to ke
Before I'm testing each message with SpamAssassin, I'm prepending the
envelope to the email message.
Can anyone comment on the positive or ill-effects this might have on the
SA scoringI'm not running the envelope-pre-pended-messages thru
bayes (sa-learn) though. I usually run messages thru s
- Original Message -
From: "Paul J. Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2005 8:46 AM
Subject: How to run spamd as root
Hi,
How do I run spamd as root? I've tried the --username=root, which the
man page implies will work, but always get the "fatal: cannot run as
no
If you don't use the -u option, it should run as root by default.
--
<>
-- Original Message ---
From: "Paul J. Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 14:46:31 -
Subject: How to run spamd as root
> Hi,
>
> How do I run spamd as root? I've tried the --usernam
Hi,
How do I run spamd as root? I've tried the --username=root, which the
man page implies will work, but always get the "fatal: cannot run as
nonexistent user or root with -u option ".
I know that I should probably be added a new user etc, but this is a
safe situation and I'd like to know how
Hi
I'm moving my sa 3.01 box to another box (better hardware) with SA
3.02.
It would be a pitty to loose all what SA 3.01 has learnt. Can I
migrate SA 3.01 data to the new box?
Thank you
Philipp
Kai Schaetzl wrote on Sun, 20 Feb 2005 02:13:45 +0100:
> > Install the Storable module.
>
Thanks for the other private Mail, Bob. I compared
/usr/lib/perl5/5.8.1/i586-linux-thread-multi/auto/Storable/
with a new system where I applied the SuSE updates first and then used
CPAN to install any rem
Thank you
These modules have been installed before SA. I re-installed SA 3.02
and the t/dnslb error was gone (???), however the other problem
Maybe it was a small delay in the DNS-answers the first time,
and now you had the answers cached. The first install maybe was a little too
fast? :-)
(t/spf)
> > Hi
> >
> > I get these error messages. Could anybody please tell me
> what's wrong?
> >
> > t/dnsbl.Not found: P_2 =
> > [127.0.0.4] #
Failed
> > test 1 in t/SATest.pm at line 530
> > Not found: P_7 =
> >
> > # Failed test 2 in t/SATest.pm at line 530 fai
Philipp Snizek wrote:
Hi
I get these error messages. Could anybody please tell me what's wrong?
t/dnsbl.Not found: P_2 =
[127.0.0.4]
# Failed test 1 in t/SATest.pm at line 530
Not found: P_7 =
# Failed test 2 in t/SATest.pm at line 530 fail #2
Just a guess, but ma
Hi
I get these error messages. Could anybody please tell me what's wrong?
t/dnsbl.Not found: P_2 =
[127.0.0.4]
# Failed test 1 in t/SATest.pm at line 530
Not found: P_7 =
# Failed test 2 in t/SATest.pm at line 530 fail #2
Not found: P_4 =
[127.0.0.1, 127
SARE has finally completed a first pass evaluation of several sets of
submitted rules concerning Rolex spam. You'll find a beta test of
these rules at
http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules/70_sare_specific_rolex.cf
You'll find a hit-frequencies report for these rules at the top of
that file.
The 70_
Just a quick note that SARE has published new URI rules files.
New files 70_sare_uri0.cf, 70_sare_uri1.cf, 70_sare_uri3.cf, and
70_sare_uri_eng.cf replace the previous file 70_sare_uri.cf
The old file has been left in our http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules/
directory, unchanged. We expect to dele
On Saturday, February 19, 2005, 8:05:05 AM, Jay Levitt wrote:
> Just checked.. there is only one resolv.conf on the system, in
> /etc/resolv.conf, and it correctly points to my own machine, which runs
> a caching named (actually caching for the world, authoritative for my
> own domain).
Note tha
On Saturday, February 19, 2005, 8:05:05 AM, Jay Levitt wrote:
> It's important to note that the DNS lookups DO work for a while after
> starting mimedefang; it's just at some point after days/weeks that it
> stops trying (or stops succeeding).
You may want to check that your name server *only* th
16 matches
Mail list logo
