At 03:50 PM 2/11/2005, ChupaCabra wrote:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: host mail.americanadvisor.net[199.231.136.136]
said: 501 5.7.1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... Sender refused by the DNSBL
cbl.abuseat.org (in reply to MAIL FROM command)
Does this mean I am on some kind of bad list? I am choiceinv
If I
Robert Menschel wrote:
Hello Matías,
Friday, February 11, 2005, 8:48:18 AM, you wrote:
MLB> I just got a spam message in my inbox without being flagged by SA, and I
MLB> find it very curios because it was a clear spam message. Wen I examine
MLB> the headers to see the score assigned by SA I get mor
This means that the server you are sending through: americanadvisor.net is
listed. If that's your sever then contact the blacklist, if it is someone
you pay, contact them!
> From: ChupaCabra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 14:50:18 -0600
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject
Hello Matías,
Friday, February 11, 2005, 8:48:18 AM, you wrote:
MLB> I just got a spam message in my inbox without being flagged by SA, and I
MLB> find it very curios because it was a clear spam message. Wen I examine
MLB> the headers to see the score assigned by SA I get more surprised
MLB>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: host mail.americanadvisor.net[199.231.136.136]
said: 501 5.7.1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... Sender refused by the DNSBL
cbl.abuseat.org (in reply to MAIL FROM command)
Does this mean I am on some kind of bad list? I am choiceinv
If I am on some list how do I get off.
We rece
Hello Matías,
Friday, February 11, 2005, 10:29:13 AM, you wrote:
>> It sounds to me like you're training a central Bayes database, while
>> the users are using their individual databases.
>>
>> Individual databases are better (non-spam to the business department
>> may look like spam to the bio-
good scoring here...
Content analysis details: (10.2 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
--
--
0.0 RCVD_BY_IP Received by mail server with no name
0.0 URG_BIZ
Matt Kettler wrote:
At 05:06 PM 2/10/2005, Matias Lopez Bergero wrote:
It is worth to train the bayes filter with messages already detected
and flagged as spam by spamassassin? That would do any good?
Yes. And even if they are already flagged as BAYES_99 it is still
worthwhile.
Many thanks for th
Matt Kettler wrote:
At 11:48 AM 2/11/2005, Matías López Bergero wrote:
I copy the message a feed SA with it
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_99,HTML_80_90,
HTML_FONT_BIG,HTML_IMAGE_RATIO_08,HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_QP_LONG_LINE
autolearn=no version=3.0.2
OK, here it
Hello Peter,
Friday, February 11, 2005, 4:17:33 AM, you wrote:
PM> but would that not mean that the bayes filter will learn the headers
PM> that spam assassin adds as spam .. and then after a while only start
PM> classing mail that already has the spam headers as bayes_99 ?
No, since the sa-lear
At 11:48 AM 2/11/2005, Matías López Bergero wrote:
I copy the message a feed SA with it
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_99,HTML_80_90,
HTML_FONT_BIG,HTML_IMAGE_RATIO_08,HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_QP_LONG_LINE
autolearn=no version=3.0.2
OK, here it hit the rules that i
>
>
>what's up with this -- is the www.exit0.us wiki out of date, or
>something? Why's AltGrendel deleting all the links to it?
>
>- --j.
not sure. It was taken down because he had changed positions but he found
another host. I'll try to email him.
--Chris
On Wednesday 09 February 2005 12:41, Michael Parker wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 11:35:32AM -0600, Jeff Gibson wrote:
> > Hi. I'm running spamassassin 3.0.0 on a Redhat ES 3 box. Postfix 2.1.5
> > is calling spamassassin. The server itself does user account lookups
> > though an LDAP server.
Am Freitag, 11. Februar 2005 17:58 schrieb Matt Kettler:
> At 11:15 AM 2/11/2005, Matías López Bergero wrote:
> >The sa-learn man page says that for a good training of the Bayesian
> >filter, you need to train it with equal amounts of spam and ham, or more
> >ham if is possible. So if I sa-learn th
Am Donnerstag, 10. Februar 2005 19:29 schrieb Matias Lopez Bergero:
> Hi,
>
> I'm relatively new using SA and I have a couple of doubts about the
> bayes db and the awl db.
> I'm running a 3.0.2 site wide install, and I have saw that for each user
> there is an .spamassassin directory, storing Baye
Robert Menschel wrote:
Hello Matias,
Thursday, February 10, 2005, 10:29:08 AM, you wrote:
MLB> The bayes and awl db are working only for the user who owns them right?
MLB> What about the bayes data created with the sa-learn command?
MLB> I'm being training spamassassin Bayesian filter since the ins
Matt Kettler wrote:
At 11:15 AM 2/11/2005, Matías López Bergero wrote:
The sa-learn man page says that for a good training of the Bayesian
filter, you need to train it with equal amounts of spam and ham, or more
ham if is possible. So if I sa-learn the spam folder, the spam tokens
are going to grow
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
what's up with this -- is the www.exit0.us wiki out of date, or
something? Why's AltGrendel deleting all the links to it?
- --j.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>Date: 2005-02-11T08:29:44
>Editor: AltGrendel
>Wiki: SpamAssassin Wiki
>Pag
At 11:15 AM 2/11/2005, Matías López Bergero wrote:
The sa-learn man page says that for a good training of the Bayesian
filter, you need to train it with equal amounts of spam and ham, or more
ham if is possible. So if I sa-learn the spam folder, the spam tokens
are going to grow a lot compared to h
Hello FH,
Thursday, February 10, 2005, 11:48:37 AM, you wrote:
F> Hopefully this isn't a FAQ, I looked over the list on the website and
F> while there is some useful info there I didn't see answers to all my
F> questions (or maybe I just didn't realize they were answered as this is
F> all new to
At 07:17 AM 2/11/2005, Peter Marshall wrote:
but would that not mean that the bayes filter will learn the headers that
spam assassin adds as spam .. and then after a while only start classing
mail that already has the spam headers as bayes_99 ?
I really do not know, I am just asking.
Erm.. no. B
Hi,
I just got a spam message in my inbox without being flagged by SA, and I
find it very curios because it was a clear spam message. Wen I examine
the headers to see the score assigned by SA I get more surprised
Content analysis details: (0.4 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name
Hello Matias,
Thursday, February 10, 2005, 10:29:08 AM, you wrote:
MLB> Hi,
MLB> I'm relatively new using SA and I have a couple of doubts about the
MLB> bayes db and the awl db.
MLB> I'm running a 3.0.2 site wide install, and I have saw that for each user
MLB> there is an .spamassassin director
Matt Kettler wrote:
At 05:06 PM 2/10/2005, Matias Lopez Bergero wrote:
It is worth to train the bayes filter with messages already detected
and flagged as spam by spamassassin? That would do any good?
Yes. And even if they are already flagged as BAYES_99 it is still
worthwhile.
Many thanks for th
> >
> >Scores pretty well (14.3, 9.0 required), though, I heard that
> >SpamAssassin
> >3+ included the SARE_FRAUD rules (or similiar). But looking at
> >the report, I
> >don't see any fraud-hits from SpamAssassin :-/
> >
> >Would it be wise to re-add SARE_FRAUD as a extra ruleset to
> >SpamAssa
>
>> > 4) Can you share the output from a --lint with us?
>> $ spamassassin --lint
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$
>
>What about spamassassin -D --lint?
>
>Kind Regards,
>Sander Holthaus
LOL, yeah I need to start typing exactly what I mean :)
Can we get the output from the "spamassassin -D --lint" ple
>
>Scores pretty well (14.3, 9.0 required), though, I heard that
>SpamAssassin
>3+ included the SARE_FRAUD rules (or similiar). But looking at
>the report, I
>don't see any fraud-hits from SpamAssassin :-/
>
>Would it be wise to re-add SARE_FRAUD as a extra ruleset to
>SpamAssassin?
>
>Kind Re
* zaine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-02-11 15:34]:
> Hi,
> I have setup spamassassin , and the problem that I am having is that the
> check_mx is 2, and for some or other reason mails are'nt being checked.
> Is there any suggestions ?
Zaine,
your problem isn't related with SpamAssassin?
Please t
Hi,
I have setup spamassassin , and the problem that I am having is that the
check_mx is 2, and for some or other reason mails are'nt being checked.
Is there any suggestions ?
Regards
Zaine
I got one I hadn't seen before - It used characters like _-/\ to spell out
the v-word and other drugs in giant letters on the screen. It looks like
learning should help. Tnx
X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,HTML_80_90,
HTML_FONT_BIG,HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_QP_LONG_LINE,MPART_
> but would that not mean that the bayes filter will learn the
> headers that spam assassin adds as spam .. and then after a
> while only start classing mail that already has the spam
> headers as bayes_99 ?
You can set bayes to ignore certain header. See the documentation for more
info. I wou
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Arend [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, February 11, 2005 1:41 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Humor: "The Ultimate Spam Email"
>
> Am Donnerstag, 10. Februar 2005 22:46 schrieb Jim Maul:
> > Mike Jackson wrote:
> > >> http
Jason, I accidently deleted your reply before I could read it ... would
you mind re-sending it ... my apologies ...
Peter
Matt Kettler wrote:
At 05:06 PM 2/10/2005, Matias Lopez Bergero wrote:
Just a question,
It is worth to train the bayes filter with messages already detected
and flagged as sp
Am Freitag, 11. Februar 2005 13:17 schrieb Peter Marshall:
> but would that not mean that the bayes filter will learn the headers
> that spam assassin adds as spam .. and then after a while only start
> classing mail that already has the spam headers as bayes_99 ?
>
> I really do not know, I am jus
Am Donnerstag, 10. Februar 2005 22:46 schrieb Jim Maul:
> Mike Jackson wrote:
> >> http://lowendmac.com/lite/05/0210.html
> >
> > I sent it to myself...
> >
> > X-Spam-Report:
> > * 1.8 URG_BIZ BODY: Contains urgent matter
> > * 0.7 SARE_MONEYTERMS BODY: Talks about money in some way.
> > * 0.7
Am Freitag, 11. Februar 2005 08:14 schrieb Sharma, Ravi:
> Its require when you rebuild the database.
That's not true. See the message from Matt.
Bayes is a statistical methode so the best way is to train all spam and ham.
But you should not train it on messages you whitelist for example with
but would that not mean that the bayes filter will learn the headers
that spam assassin adds as spam .. and then after a while only start
classing mail that already has the spam headers as bayes_99 ?
I really do not know, I am just asking.
Peter
Matt Kettler wrote:
At 05:06 PM 2/10/2005, Matias
At 02:05 AM 2/11/2005, Monty Ree wrote:
I have upgraded SA 3.0.2 at linux+sendmail.
after that, I have found that so lots of messages at /var/log/maillog like
below.
AFAIK, these messages are useless for me and thess eat some resources like
CPU, HDD..etc.. .
So is there any method to disable thes
> > 4) Can you share the output from a --lint with us?
> $ spamassassin --lint
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$
What about spamassassin -D --lint?
Kind Regards,
Sander Holthaus
The message ID shows that this email originated from
"flonetwork.com".Flonetwork is owned by Doubleclick. Need I say more?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I just received the spam below. T-online.de, a spinoff of former state telekom,
is one of the
major providers in germany for private inter
At 06:41 AM 2/11/2005, Matt Kettler wrote:
What follows test should be a series of domain names to test the servers
in resolv.conf by querying the MX record for the domain. This should,
theoretically, not be one of your local domains if you want the test to be
a complete test of your servers. At
At 03:14 AM 2/11/2005, Johann Spies wrote:
dns_available test: localhost 146.232.128.10 146.232.128.1
erm What are you trying to accomplish with the above?
The "test" option should not be followed by a list of nameservers to query.
SA will end up inheriting that information from resolv.conf.
On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 10:57:20AM -0500, Chris Santerre wrote:
>
> 1) Nice rulesets ;)
> 2) Please tell me you are using net-tests. SURBL? (might want to increase
> those scores.)
Yes, I am using them and they appear regularly in the logs.
skip_rbl_checks 0
dns_available test: localhost 146.23
Its require when you rebuild the database.
Ravi
-Original Message-
From: Matias Lopez Bergero [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 11, 2005 3:36 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: bayesian filter training
Hi
Just a question,
It is worth to train the bayes filter w
Hello, all.
I have upgraded SA 3.0.2 at linux+sendmail.
after that, I have found that so lots of messages at /var/log/maillog like
below.
AFAIK, these messages are useless for me and thess eat some resources like
CPU, HDD..etc.. .
So is there any method to disable these messages?
Thanks in advan
45 matches
Mail list logo
