Good evening, all,
I have a favor to ask. Kennedy Western has written in asking to
be removed from the sa-blacklist - the audacity! :-)
Could I trouble any of you that keep your back spam to grab any
Kennedy Wester spams and send them along to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(obviously, this address is fo
On Mon, Jan 17, 2005 at 06:37:06PM -0500, Steven W. Orr wrote:
> header MY_MNUMERIC_TO To =~ /[EMAIL PROTECTED]/i
> Anyone?
So you want a To header that starts with m and some numbers,
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
but the To header starts with a <, not an m ...
Perhaps you meant To:addr?
--
Ra
I have this in my local.cf
header MY_MNUMERIC_TO To =~ /[EMAIL PROTECTED]/i
score MY_MNUMERIC_TO 5.0
describeMY_MNUMERIC_TO All numeric address after M in To:
Despite that, the following message got through. The M in the regex is
inside an i operator so that shouldn't be the
At 04:35 PM 1/17/2005, Haines Brown wrote:
For a new installation, I'm trying to attach spamassassin 2.64-1 to
amavisd-new under Debian testing. ClamAV is presently working
correctly with amavisd-new.
During boot, I get the report in dmesg:
SpamAssassin Mail Filter Daemon: spamd
However, when I r
For a new installation, I'm trying to attach spamassassin 2.64-1 to
amavisd-new under Debian testing. ClamAV is presently working
correctly with amavisd-new.
During boot, I get the report in dmesg:
SpamAssassin Mail Filter Daemon: spamd
However, when I run # spamassassin --lint, I get
Spa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Montag, 17. Januar 2005 21:35 schrieb alexander hachmann:
> Hello,
> I am using Spamassassin 2.63 with SQL-Configuration.
> When I want to redefine scores in my local.cf it simply does not work. The
> new Score i am setting will not be used.
>
> sco
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Montag, 17. Januar 2005 06:34 schrieb Loren Wilton:
> > Probably want to nuke punctuation and capitalization before doing
> > the sort. I'm too braindead at the moment, but some perl incantation
> > might be the way to go, or if you're old school t
Hello,
I am using
Spamassassin 2.63 with SQL-Configuration.
When I want to
redefine scores in my local.cf it simply does not work. The new Score i am
setting will not be used.
score
MSGID_FROM_MTA_SHORT 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
What else do I have
to do to make Spamassassin use these new def
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Montag, 17. Januar 2005 19:56 schrieb John Fleming:
> > The Bayes_9x scores were a bit low for our needs. So we bumped them
> > up. That is one of the great things I like about SA. You can customize
> > it to meet your needs.
> >
> > Shane
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Montag, 17. Januar 2005 15:34 schrieb Guillaume Urbejtel:
> Hi All,
>
> For some days BAYES probabilty jump for almost all messages, i've
> BAYES_50 for almost all message including ham...
> What can be the reason ?
>
> Thanks for your help !
I hav
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Sonntag, 16. Januar 2005 15:52 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Finaly got bayes to work, default fedora core 3 lacks some configurations,
> did alot of read about bayes but one thing i dont undertend. Do i have to
> provide bayes all the spam manualy o
> The Bayes_9x scores were a bit low for our needs. So we bumped them
> up. That is one of the great things I like about SA. You can customize
> it to meet your needs.
>
> Shane
My part of the thread was that the scores don't consistently go -up- with
increased percentage - see previous. t
Roger WJ Alterskjær <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote on 01/17/2005 11:38:38 AM:
> > >
> > > I'm trying to get the additional info on what tests were
'plinged' when
> > > run through SA. With 2.64 I was able to get these reports
when a
> > message
> > > was marked as spam.(the old X-Spam-Report which is
On Monday 17 January 2005 7:34 am, Andy Jezierski wrote:
> Martin Hepworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 01/17/2005
>
> 03:37:10 AM:
> > It's true, Verizon have apparently blocked all email from RIPE, APNIC
> > allocated addresses (Europe and Asia Pac) starting Dec 22 2004.
> > Apparently MessageLab
Hey John,
The Bayes_9x scores were a bit low for our needs. So we bumped them
up. That is one of the great things I like about SA. You can customize
it to meet your needs.
Shane
- Original Message -
From: "John Fleming" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Subject: Re: BAYES_99 = 1.9?
To: ; "Paul
> 1.9 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 99 to
100%
[score: 1.]
And what's the rationale for 95% scoring lower than 80%?? Sorry if this has
been previously mentioned.
score BAYES_00 0 0 -1.665 -2.599
score BAYES_05 0 0 -0.925 -0.
Hi All--
I've upgraded SA from 2.63 to 3.0.2 and I've noticed a big difference
in my bayes scores. Under 2.63 a 99% bayes probability would give me a
score of 5.4, now I get only 1.9:
Content analysis details: (1.9 points, 4.0 required)
pts rule name description
Andy Jezierski wrote:
Roger WJ Alterskjær <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 01/17/2005
10:27:20 AM:
> Matt Kettler wrote:
>
> > At 09:53 AM 1/17/2005, Roger WJ Alterskjær wrote:
> >
> >> I've recently upgraded SA from 2.64 to 3.0.2 and now can't seem to
> >> get the add_header option working. Before I
Roger WJ Alterskjær <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote on 01/17/2005 10:27:20 AM:
> Matt Kettler wrote:
>
> > At 09:53 AM 1/17/2005, Roger WJ Alterskjær wrote:
> >
> >> I've recently upgraded SA from 2.64 to 3.0.2 and now can't
seem to
> >> get the add_header option working. Before I start: RH9, SA
3.0.
"Gary W. Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote on 01/17/2005 10:35:24 AM:
> I have been getting a couple blank emails lately and looking into
> the headers I find that itâs clearly marked as spam but the subject
> hasnât been rewritten because it doesnât exist in the header. Is
> there a
Title: No subject header then no tag rewrite
I have been getting a couple blank emails lately and looking into the headers I find that it’s clearly marked as spam but the subject hasn’t been rewritten because it doesn’t exist in the header. Is there a way to force SA to put a subject header
Matt Kettler wrote:
At 09:53 AM 1/17/2005, Roger WJ Alterskjær wrote:
I've recently upgraded SA from 2.64 to 3.0.2 and now can't seem to
get the add_header option working. Before I start: RH9, SA 3.0.2,
spamd -d -c -m5 -u qscand, spamc called by qmail-scanner 1.24.
In /etc/mail/spamassassin/loca
Robert Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
on 01/17/2005 10:03:46 AM:
> Because I invoke SA myself from a perlscript that filters my incoming
> email I haven't yet moved to the later version 3 builds.
>
> Can anybody summarize what I'm missing by not upgrading?
>
Check the SpamAssassin wiki p
Because I invoke SA myself from a perlscript that filters my incoming
email I haven't yet moved to the later version 3 builds.
Can anybody summarize what I'm missing by not upgrading?
>-Original Message-
>From: Martin Hepworth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Monday, January 17, 2005 4:37 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: Re: Verizon hosting spammers :)
>
>
>
>It's true, Verizon have apparently blocked all email from RIPE, APNIC
>a
Martin Hepworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote on 01/17/2005 03:37:10 AM:
>
> It's true, Verizon have apparently blocked all email from RIPE, APNIC
> allocated addresses (Europe and Asia Pac) starting Dec 22 2004.
> Apparently MessageLabs took 2 whole days to get onto their whitelist.
>
> http://w
Matt Kettler wrote:
At 09:53 AM 1/17/2005, Roger WJ Alterskjær wrote:
I've recently upgraded SA from 2.64 to 3.0.2 and now can't seem to
get the add_header option working. Before I start: RH9, SA 3.0.2,
spamd -d -c -m5 -u qscand, spamc called by qmail-scanner 1.24.
In /etc/mail/spamassassin/loca
At 09:53 AM 1/17/2005, Roger WJ Alterskjær wrote:
I've recently upgraded SA from 2.64 to 3.0.2 and now can't seem to get the
add_header option working. Before I start: RH9, SA 3.0.2, spamd -d -c -m5
-u qscand, spamc called by qmail-scanner 1.24.
In /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf I've got:
add_h
Hi!
I've recently upgraded SA from 2.64 to 3.0.2 and now can't seem to get
the add_header option working. Before I start: RH9, SA 3.0.2, spamd -d
-c -m5 -u qscand, spamc called by qmail-scanner 1.24.
In /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf I've got:
add_header all Status _YESNO_, score=_SCORE_ requir
Hi All,
For some days BAYES probabilty jump for almost all messages, i've
BAYES_50 for almost all message including ham...
What can be the reason ?
Thanks for your help !
Seems to chug on through it.. doesn't hesitate at all.. yet if I
turn spamassassin scanning on.. the mail server starts lagging so bad
it's not even funny..
On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 21:35:50 -0600, Keith Whyte
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Matt, maybe you could try running some mail manually thr
I did get SpamAssassin to build properly after upgrading the Bundle::CPAN and
Digest::SHA1. Thanks for everybody's input!
Giff
-Original Message-
From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, 16 January, 2005 10:54
To: Giff Hammar; users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re:
It's true, Verizon have apparently blocked all email from RIPE, APNIC
allocated addresses (Europe and Asia Pac) starting Dec 22 2004.
Apparently MessageLabs took 2 whole days to get onto their whitelist.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/01/14/verizon_email_block/
D'oh...
--
Martin Hepworth
Snr
Yes, I think they host a lot of spammers.
I only get spam/virus mails from Verizon here (Netherlands) so I blocked
dsl-verizon.net in postfix and it that means about 100 spams/viruses less
per day. If they want to sent real mail they still can do so through the
smtp-servers of their provider.
There
I have used spamassassin on exchange using the sink from
christopherlewis.com
Using the instructions on the SpamAssassin site, I modified
the code for spamd and have gotten it to run, and have a compiled spamc in place….
Has anyone done any work to use spamc/spamd in an exchange
env
> Probably want to nuke punctuation and capitalization before doing
> the sort. I'm too braindead at the moment, but some perl incantation
> might be the way to go, or if you're old school then awk would probably
> work.
Yea, that occurred to me. Since I was pasting a spam into a text file
anywa
Probably want to nuke punctuation and capitalization before doing
the sort. I'm too braindead at the moment, but some perl incantation
might be the way to go, or if you're old school then awk would probably
work.
Steve
Rich Puhek wrote:
Loren Wilton wrote:
I'm not a unix type, so how to do this is
Loren Wilton wrote:
I'm not a unix type, so how to do this isn't obvious to me, but it is
probably trivial.
Given a file with a few paragraphs of words (multiple words per line,
obviously) I want to generate a list of the individual words in descending
order of occurance frequency. I'd like the fr
I'm not a unix type, so how to do this isn't obvious to me, but it is
probably trivial.
Given a file with a few paragraphs of words (multiple words per line,
obviously) I want to generate a list of the individual words in descending
order of occurance frequency. I'd like the frequency number with
I'm pretty sure there is a bug on on this, but I don't know the status of
the bug.
Loren
Finaly got bayes to work, default fedora core 3 lacks some configurations,
did alot of read about bayes but one thing i dont undertend. Do i have to
provide bayes all the spam manualy or spamassim do the job?
- Original Message -
From: "Thomas Arend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Frida
41 matches
Mail list logo
