Matt Kettler wrote:
Having overlap for at least one revision allows seamless in-place
upgrade.
Having zero does not.
No Dan, it does not allow a seamless in-place upgrade, unless you only
ever upgrade once.
If SA version N+1 supports commands from N, and your config file is in
version N syntax
Dan Hollis wrote:
On Mon, 10 Jan 2005, Matt Kettler wrote:
spamassassin could adopt a policy of backwards compat over _one_ revision.
As it is, the policy is backwards compat over _ZERO_ revisions. This hurts.
This seems to be Samba's policy -- options are deprecated for one major
revision, then
I wondered if anyone had tracked down a cause/solution to the insecure
dependency on reporting to spamcop with RH9?
I have 3 RH9 servers here. One, which has been upgraded from RH7 progressively
through to RH9, which does not report this insecure dependency. While I have 2
others, installed with
At 07:47 PM 1/14/2005, Giff Hammar wrote:
I am trying to build SpamAssassin 3.0.2 on RH9 and it fails when I try to run
make. The error message is:
SHA1 object version 2.01 does not match bootstrap parameter 2.07 at
/usr/lib/perl5/5.8.0/i386-linux-thread-multi/DynaLoa
der.pm line 249.
SA 3.0.x req
At 02:55 PM 1/15/2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
/usr/local/bin/spamd -d -x -u qscand -r /var/run/spamd.pid
I used to run a script to kill and restart spamd every time I made a
config change (ie, whitelist) because it was said that older versions of
SA needed a full restart. I tried a SIGHUP for th
Em Sábado, 15 de Janeiro de 2005 16:04, Matt Kettler escreveu:
> At 10:54 AM 1/15/2005, Zé wrote:
> >I use mandrake with kde-3.3.2.
> >After i installed spamassassin-spamc-3.0.2-1mdk stoped classifing spam
> > emails. No more spam mails were recognized.
>
> Have you checked that SA is working at al
Right, but how do I pump the email into sa-laern on a relay only server?
-Original Message-
From: Rainer Sokoll [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 15, 2005 4:00 PM
To: SPAMASSASSIN
Subject: Re: Training ham
On Sat, Jan 15, 2005 at 03:07:27PM -0500, Jason Gauthier wrote:
