On Fri, 24 Dec 2004 10:56:27 +0900
alan premselaar wrote:
> Chances are if your mail is being rejected (5xx errors), then there's
> something in your MTA configuration that's checking SPEWS and rejecting
> based on its results. (which I personally feel isn't such a great tactic
> for just THIS
At 09:33 PM 12/23/2004 -0600, Andy Norris wrote:
I want to add this to the whitelist. So I have this rule in a custom rule
set (I KNOW these rules should be firing, as some of the other rules in
this file are hitting on test messages):
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] ezwsmtp03.xm-radio.c
> I just upgraded my Testbed SA installation (on a Solaris 8 system with
> Perl 5.8.5) from 3.0.1 to 3.0.2 and am having problems that didn't
> exist in 3.0.1. Running "spamassassin -D --lint < /dev/null" reveals:
>
> warning: description for RM_sw_LeadingPrep is over 50 chars
> warning: descripti
Also make sure that you updated the DB format if you moved from 2.6x to
3.0.1. Maybe Bayes is turned on, but every time it tastes the DB it doesn't
like the format.
Loren
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Freitag, 24. Dezember 2004 04:33 schrieb Andy Norris:
> Okay, if someone's feeling really holiday generous, maybe they can help me
> out here... I'm having some problems whitelisting some mailing lists (this
> one, for instance!) and some other mail
Thanks Alan,
I'm running spamassassin through MailScanner. So I'm not running spamd. Is
this a wrinkle in the scheme of things?
Andy
At 11:25 pm 2004-12-23, alan premselaar wrote:
Andy Norris wrote:
Okay, if someone's feeling really holiday generous, maybe they can help
me out here... I'm having
Andy Norris wrote:
Okay, if someone's feeling really holiday generous, maybe they can help
me out here... I'm having some problems whitelisting some mailing lists
(this one, for instance!) and some other mail...
As an example, I have these headers:
X-Persona:
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Re
I'm updating an SA installing on a machine using qmail packages. It appears
that the "report_safe" settings (and many other rewrites) are ignored by
qmail_scanner. So far, I've been told "read the documentation". Aargh. Been
doing that! If only it were obvious.
Anyhow, does anyone here use RE
Okay, if someone's feeling really holiday generous, maybe they can help me
out here... I'm having some problems whitelisting some mailing lists (this
one, for instance!) and some other mail...
As an example, I have these headers:
X-Persona:
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from tiresw
On Thu, 23 Dec 2004 19:06:04 -0800 (GMT-08:00)
Loren Wilton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have been looking around to see if I could find documentation on
> > how
> to customize spamassassin tests. For instance I have a client who
> would like to be able to block a certain subject. Just wonderi
On Thu, 23 Dec 2004 18:37:59 -0800
Mosenior Moses <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Greetings All,
>
> I have been looking around to see if I could find documentation on how
> to customize spamassassin tests. For instance I have a client who would
> like to be able to block a certain subject. Just wo
Greetings All,
I have been looking around to see if I could find documentation on how
to customize spamassassin tests. For instance I have a client who would
like to be able to block a certain subject. Just wondering if this is
possible with spamassassin, and where I can find out how to get it do
On Thursday, December 23, 2004, 5:52:40 PM, Jeff Chan wrote:
> On Thursday, December 23, 2004, 5:29:23 PM, Brenda Bell wrote:
>> I upgraded from 3.0.1 to 3.0.2 this morning and all of a sudden,
>> I can't send myself email from work because spews blacklisted an
>> entire block of uunet addresses an
Brenda Bell wrote:
I've searched both local.cf and all of the rules files for spews
and for the life of me, I can't figure out why my SA is checking
spews. Could someone please point me in the right direction?
From what I can tell, spews isn't in the standard SpamAssassin config,
so the timing is
Brenda Bell wrote:
I upgraded from 3.0.1 to 3.0.2 this morning and all of a sudden,
I can't send myself email from work because spews blacklisted an
entire block of uunet addresses and my company is in the middle
of the block. (side note: we do not spam and we fight it with
every bit of technolog
On Thursday, December 23, 2004, 5:29:23 PM, Brenda Bell wrote:
> I upgraded from 3.0.1 to 3.0.2 this morning and all of a sudden,
> I can't send myself email from work because spews blacklisted an
> entire block of uunet addresses and my company is in the middle
> of the block. (side note: we do
I upgraded from 3.0.1 to 3.0.2 this morning and all of a sudden,
I can't send myself email from work because spews blacklisted an
entire block of uunet addresses and my company is in the middle
of the block. (side note: we do not spam and we fight it with
every bit of technology we have).
I've s
Hi, folks. Briefly, I've attempted to un-subscribe from the list on
more than one occasion. I've received confirmation that I'm
un-subscribed, but I keep receiving the digest in my e-mail. Any
assistance is greatly appreciated.
Thank you.
18 matches
Mail list logo