Re: Can someone better explain ALL_TRUSTED to me?

On Sat, 2004-12-04 at 03:20 -0500, Matt Kettler wrote: > At 08:04 PM 12/3/2004 -0600, Thomas Cameron wrote: > >Since upgrading to 3.0.1 I have actually gotten a few more spams than > >with 3.0.0. SA is still catching well over 99% so I am certainly not > >complaining - I've gone from no spams in m

X-Spam-Level header

I recently installed SA 3.0.1. Everything is working fine... but now I want to set up some filters in my e-mail client. What I want to do is automatically send anything with more than some number of stars to the trash bin. I can do that with a regex-like expression in my email client. But I nee

Re: low scoring SPAM

>> I've recently (about a month ago) installed a new mail server and >> upgraded to SA 3.01. I've been training the bayes database by hand >> (most of our mail is japanese and the autolearning wasn't a good way to >> start the bayes learning) >> >> anyways, I'm not using any custom or 3rd

RE: low scoring SPAM

|-Original Message- |From: alan premselaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] |Sent: 04 December 2004 15:23 |To: users@spamassassin.apache.org |Subject: low scoring SPAM | |I've recently (about a month ago) installed a new mail server and |upgraded to SA 3.01. I've been training the bayes da

Re: Bayes question

On Sat, Dec 04, 2004 at 10:46:22AM +, Ricardo Oliveira wrote: > According to the docs, --restore is destructive (in the sense it > destroys the previous contents of the database). > > Would you guys be interested in such a feature? I plan to use a > generic bayes DB (which is maintained by our

low scoring SPAM

I've recently (about a month ago) installed a new mail server and upgraded to SA 3.01. I've been training the bayes database by hand (most of our mail is japanese and the autolearning wasn't a good way to start the bayes learning) anyways, I'm not using any custom or 3rd party rules. I'm

about sa-learn

who can tell me what the sa-learn learnt, and how to see what the sa-learn learnt. thanx -- StevenPan

Re: Bayes question

According to the docs, --restore is destructive (in the sense it destroys the previous contents of the database). Would you guys be interested in such a feature? I plan to use a generic bayes DB (which is maintained by our tech team), and merge it with each clients's own DB (which would result in

Re: Can someone better explain ALL_TRUSTED to me?

At 08:04 PM 12/3/2004 -0600, Thomas Cameron wrote: Since upgrading to 3.0.1 I have actually gotten a few more spams than with 3.0.0. SA is still catching well over 99% so I am certainly not complaining - I've gone from no spams in my inbox to about three a week. The thing I've noticed on all of th

Re: spamd does not start

Thanks to Alan, Dan. I found two Socket.pm, one is v1.72 and the other v1.5. # find ./ -name "Socket.pm" -print ./5.6.1/i386-linux-thread-multi/IO/Socket.pm ./5.6.1/i386-linux-thread-multi/Socket.pm ./site_perl/5.6.1/i386-linux-thread-multi/Socket.pm # find ./ -name "Socket.so" -print ./5.6.1/i38

3 suggested rules regarding forged local addresses

(We use SA (currently 2.64) called from procmail-delivered sendmail on Solaris systems. We get something over 100K msgs/day. Most of our mail is addressed using @ our local domain.) Three suggested rules: 1) Detect mail allegedly from a local address that is invalid (should get a high s

mail to antiphishing.org bouncing

Did this site go down or is there another address now? To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent:Fri, 3 Dec 2004 20:56:53 -0500 did not reach the following recipient(s): [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 3 Dec 2004 20:58:27 -0500 The recipient name is not recognized -- Chris Registered Linux User 28

Can someone better explain ALL_TRUSTED to me?

Since upgrading to 3.0.1 I have actually gotten a few more spams than with 3.0.0. SA is still catching well over 99% so I am certainly not complaining - I've gone from no spams in my inbox to about three a week. The thing I've noticed on all of the ones which get through is that ALL_TRUSTED is on

Non-Clickable URI's

Hello List, I've seen spams where spammers are using "Cut&Paste_this_URL_to_your_browser" method reason why spamassassin won't trigger SURBL database lookup. Is there a known workaround to catch this non-clickable URIs and trigger SURBL lookup? Thanks in advance. -RD

Re: quarantine how?

> At 06:13 PM 12/3/2004, Peter Matulis wrote: >>How does one begin using the quarantine? I am using SA 3.01 with milter >>smtp-vilter. > > SA has no quarantine support. AFAIK, neither does smtp-vilter. However, I > think that clamav has some built-in quarantine support that ends up being > used wi

Bayes DB Get Corrupted Quickly

Hello - You may all remember me from my post last week about my Bayes database not expiring tokens. I am running SA version 2.64 on FreeBSD 4.10-RELEASE-p4 with Perl 5.005_03. One person sent me a Perl script that was supposed to "adjust" all the newest "ATIME" values, but that didn't seem to wor

RE: quarantine how?

Matt Kettler wrote: > At 06:13 PM 12/3/2004, Peter Matulis wrote: > Most delivery-time tools, such as milters, are good at > rejection, but are not so good with quarantines. A notable exception is the milter MIMEDefang, which is good at both... even simultaneously. That is, you could keep a quar

Re: quarantine how?

At 06:13 PM 12/3/2004, Peter Matulis wrote: How does one begin using the quarantine? I am using SA 3.01 with milter smtp-vilter. SA has no quarantine support. AFAIK, neither does smtp-vilter. However, I think that clamav has some built-in quarantine support that ends up being used with smtp-vil