David Brodbeck wrote:
make sure in writing before you sign anything that your ip(s) will
never be listed by the ISP as res/dynamic/dialup ip. If they do they
may be in breach of contract (and you would need a lawyer for
resolution.)
I doubt any ISP would agree to a contract term like that, beca
| DUHL is intended to be used on INCOMMING mail only - on the host where
| ones MX records point to.
I may be missing something, but I think the OP was *not* complaining about
lack of ability to send mail over the Internet from a DUHL / dynamic IP,
but rather, failing foul of a mis-configured SA s
I didn't think my "listed in sorbs" and "reply from sorbs" threads would net
so many replies or so much help. What I guess caused all this is that I
was having results of cronjobs sent to me via my ISP. Again, I'll
reinterate, I don't run a mail server, hell, I can't even figure out still
aft
> a question that Google nor any list I can find will answer... trying to
> install perl module Net::Ident, I get make test errors as follows. I'd
> really appreciate any tips. I've no idea why this is happening (Fedora
> Core 1):
>
> # perl -MCPAN -e'CPAN::Shell->install("Net::Ident")'
>
Reread it, i said *YOUR* ISP marking *YOUR* leased IP(s) as
*DUL/DYN/RES* read before replying (OH yes, ISP'S *DO* this kind of
thing to enforce their polices.) :-D And yes, an isp who does not agree,
is sheit imo, if they're too lazy to classify their ips, move along, get
sat, cable etc. The
Message from user inside www.pair.com:
>> Original message
Apparently Yahoo has slightly changed the routing of groups messages:
SA EvalTests.pm
/from \[$IP_ADDRESS\] by \S+\.(?:groups|grp\.scd)\.yahoo\.com with NNFMP/
Received headers with NNFMP:
from [66.218.69.1] by n22
(my choice of comments to reply to make my position sound a lot more at
odds with your overall post than I am, but there were a two parts I
just had to respond to)
On Nov 28, 2004, at 9:00 AM, Bob Amen wrote:
It's very depressing and getting worse, according to my mail servers'
statistics.
Hm.
JamesDR wrote:
make sure in writing before you sign anything that your ip(s) will
never be listed by the ISP as res/dynamic/dialup ip. If they do they
may be in breach of contract (and you would need a lawyer for
resolution.)
I doubt any ISP would agree to a contract term like that, because the
DSL, Cable, T1, Fiber, etc. your high speed connection type shouldn't be
blacklisted, your service level should, ie dynamic residential line. A
business class customer paying for static ip(s) on a (a/s)dsl line
should not have their ip's blacklisted. I've seen as much spam come from
lines where
I have not been paying attention to the bayes internals. Here is the
output of a recent sa-learn --force-expire run.
synced Bayes databases from journal in 0 seconds: 1248 unique entries (1790
total entries)
expired old Bayes database entries in 31 seconds
156683 entries kept, 6897 deleted
Chris wrote:
> However, I do not run a mail server, the offending msg came from the fact
> that every 4hrs I restart spamd and have the output of the crontab mailed
> to me. I also have the results of the rootkit hunter cronjob mailed to me
> daily. Is the problem caused by the fact that the m
Chris wrote:
> Jim Maul wrote:
> > Id say its because you have a dynamic ip address. You might want to
> > send all mail out through your isp's mail servers instead.
>
> All msgs do go through EL, AFAIK, here are two headers, the first from a msg
> not marked as spam, the second the headers from
I realize this is way off topic, but it is important to spam fighting.
jdow wrote:
On Sun, Nov 28, 2004 at 10:11:12AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
if I did not miss anything in this thread, the victim HAS a static IP on
the cable/dsl link and
pays more for the access than d
On Sat, 27 Nov 2004, Gary W. Smith yowled:
> You only really need to reboot if you have applications that are poorly
> writing and leak memory.
s/applications/kernel modules/
If a memory leak propagates outside the app (and shared memory segments,
and so on) it's the kernel's fault for letting
Is FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD slightly dodgy:
Received: from checkpoint.spamchek.net (node6.pleiades.net [192.168.3.106])
by local.spamchek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 870E1DC0B4
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 27 Nov 2004 15:38:34 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mta309.mail.scd.yahoo.com (mta309.mail.sc
OK, I've decided. I'll boot on April Fools' day, whether it needs it or not.
Just to honor the old days.
My UPS is only good for a few minutes - 1200 VA box with 5 servers and a
monitor on it. But the 15KW generator out back has a 250 Gallon Propane
tank, electric start and an Automatic Transfer S
From: "Nicolas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: 2004 November, 28, Sunday 02:12
Subject: Re: reply from sorbs
> On Sun, Nov 28, 2004 at 10:11:12AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > if I did not miss anything in this thread, the victim HAS a static IP on
the cable/dsl link and
> > pay
On Sun, Nov 28, 2004 at 10:11:12AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> if I did not miss anything in this thread, the victim HAS a static IP on the
> cable/dsl link and
> pays more for the access than dynamic ip would cost with the same provider.
> The provider, however, reports a full ip b
>>
>> On Sat, Nov 27, 2004 at 04:43:37PM -0800, Bob Amen wrote:
>> >I must disagree. Unfortunately the number of responsible people on
>> > the other end of cable and DSL modems is vanishingly small compared to
>> > the number of zombie machines that are spewing spam and more viruses. On
>>
On Sat, Nov 27, 2004 at 04:43:37PM -0800, Bob Amen wrote:
>I must disagree. Unfortunately the number of responsible people on
> the other end of cable and DSL modems is vanishingly small compared to
> the number of zombie machines that are spewing spam and more viruses. On
> a typical day we
>support DSL. I nearly cried when I took that machine down. (I'd even
>moved it, while still on its UPS, from one side of the room to another
>when we rearranged the room for better space utilization.)
Oh, that's nothing. :) I had a Sparc 5 that was up for like 520 days. I
moved from Sacramento, C
On Saturday 27 November 2004 05:10 pm, jdow wrote:
> And indeed, it should only be used on mail that is incoming from the
> Internet. Local mail should bypass the SpamAssassin checks. That way
> cron job emails to root will not get filtered. That does not, however,
> help you with regards to email
jdow wrote:
It means your address is in a set of DSL addresses listed as Dial Up
addresses. Ye verily thou art stuck in the fork.
[...]
(See why I do not like such broad brush black lists? They false alarm
BADLY at times they should not, far too many times.)
I must disagree. Unfortunately
jdow wrote:
Reboot? Whazzat?
If you run a Unix-like OS, it's the last thing that you do
before you go back outside. ;-)
This was from our credit card processor, shut down only
because we moved.
s2:[/usr/local/ccd]
uname -a
BSD/OS s2.easley.net 4.0.1 BSDI BSD/OS 4.0.1 Kernel #0:
Fri Oct 22 00:
24 matches
Mail list logo
