RE: Recreate bayes_toks and bayes_seen

Tuc at Beach House wrote: >> I've tried touching bayes_seen and bayes_toks, but when I go to >> learn I get this error: Cannot open bayes databases > /etc/mail/spamassassin/bayes/bayes_* R/O: >> tie failed: Inappropriate file type or format >> >> How can I create the fil

RE: Recreate bayes_toks and bayes_seen

Tuc at Beach House wrote: >> I've tried touching bayes_seen and bayes_toks, but when I go to >> learn I get this error: Cannot open bayes databases > /etc/mail/spamassassin/bayes/bayes_* R/O: >> tie failed: Inappropriate file type or format >> >> How can I create the fil

Re: Recreate bayes_toks and bayes_seen

At 05:00 PM 11/17/2004, Mike Loiterman wrote: I had to blow away my bayes dbs and now I want to start over. I've tried touching bayes_seen and bayes_toks, but when I go to learn I get this error: Cannot open bayes databases /etc/mail/spamassassin/bayes/bayes_* R/O: tie failed: Inappropriate file ty

Recreate bayes_toks and bayes_seen

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 - -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I had to blow away my bayes dbs and now I want to start over. I've tried touching bayes_seen and bayes_toks, but when I go to learn I get this error: Cannot open bayes databases /etc/mail/spamassassin

trying to get spamassassin & maildrop to play together

I am trying to look at getting spamassassin 3.0 from the backport for Debian to work with maildrop and I am getting a bit confused. First I can't seem to get maildrop to read it's config file in /etc/maildroprc. I added the logfile "/var/log/maildrop" directive and created the logfile with the

Re: [OT] Amavisd memory usage

Thanks! Mike- On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 12:19:27 -0800, you wrote: >-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >Hash: SHA1 > > >yep, it's normal; big/complex messages result in bigger allocations, >and those allocs don't get returned to the OS until the process >exits. > >- --j. > >Michael W Cocke writes: >

RE: Problem after upgrading Spam Assassin to 3.0.1

From: Brian O'Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Bowie Bailey wrote: > > >From: Brian O'Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > >>I am new to mailing lists and Linux so please excuse some of the > >>mistakes I know I am going to make. > >> > >>I just started working at this company and thei

Re: kinda OT procmailrc

I took the trailing slash off and it was just chunking my mail into the Maildir. Not in tmp, new or current. The users didn't like that and then I had to go put them in the right spot. :-) The \[SPAM\] escapes worked wonders though. Bob Proulx wrote: You need to understand that Maildir forma

Re: [OT] Amavisd memory usage

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 yep, it's normal; big/complex messages result in bigger allocations, and those allocs don't get returned to the OS until the process exits. - --j. Michael W Cocke writes: > This is off topic and I apologize, but I really couldn't think of a > better

RE: SURBL and DNS wildcards

>-Original Message- >From: Dallas L. Engelken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2004 2:23 PM >To: users@spamassassin.apache.org >Subject: RE: SURBL and DNS wildcards *snip* > >Chris or Jeff can correct me if I'm wrong, but only the registered >domain names go into S

Re: Configuring bayes lock file locations?

brian wrote: After upgrading to 3.0.1 I've been having problems with bayes. This may be a question for the mimedefang guys, but I'll start here. I have upgraded the databases, and its now reading correctly, as I get bayes scoring now. However autoupdates are failing because of lock files...

RE: SURBL and DNS wildcards

> > I've been having a few spams slip through recently that > aren't hitting some of the SURBLs. Upon checking them using > the tool at: > > http://www.rulesemporium.com/cgi-bin/uribl.cgi > > I've noticed that some of the root domains are listed, but > the full exanded domain may not be. For i

Re: DB_File errors

On Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 06:53:26PM +, James Marquez wrote: > They seem to be exactly the same errors Keith Hackworth was getting > on his posting "sa-learn --dump magic returns DB_File errors" Date; > thu, 21 Oct 2004 He says this is a problem with DB_File needing to > set LD_LIBRARY_PATH durin

Configuring bayes lock file locations?

After upgrading to 3.0.1 I've been having problems with bayes. This may be a question for the mimedefang guys, but I'll start here. I have upgraded the databases, and its now reading correctly, as I get bayes scoring now. However autoupdates are failing because of lock files... In my config I

SURBL and DNS wildcards

I've been having a few spams slip through recently that aren't hitting some of the SURBLs. Upon checking them using the tool at: http://www.rulesemporium.com/cgi-bin/uribl.cgi I've noticed that some of the root domains are listed, but the full exanded domain may not be. For instance one spam ha

DB_File errors

I am getting the following erros with DB_File when I test spamassassin. {101} spamassassin < /export/new_stuff/Mail-SpamAssassin-3.0.1/ sample-spam.txt Use of uninitialized value in numeric gt (>) at /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.5/sun4- solaris/DB_File.pm line 271. Deep recursion on subroutine "DB_Fi

Re: kinda OT procmailrc

ChupaCabra wrote: > Bob Proulx wrote: > > MAILDIR=$HOME/Mail > > DEFAULT=$MAILDIR/Maildir/ > > > >You have MAILDIR in $HOME so this is a change from that and moves it > >into $HOME/Mail. But as a user I would hate my ISP if they put > >$MAILDIR in $HOME. Use a subdirectory! > > the actual directo

Re: Solaris compile ld: fatal: Symbol referencing errors

James Marquez hotmail.com> writes: > > Well I seem to have a problem getting Spamassassin 3.0.1 to compile. I am > running Solaris 2.5.1 with Perl 5.8.5 and gcc 3.3.2. I have been able to > install all the required perl modules. Now I want to finally install > Spamassassin and I get this erro

RE: Problem after upgrading Spam Assassin to 3.0.1

From: Brian O'Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > I am new to mailing lists and Linux so please excuse some of the > mistakes I know I am going to make. > > I just started working at this company and their mail server was > already setup. Recently my boss was complaining that he is > receiving a

RE: any rules for RelayCountry?

|-Original Message- |From: Eric A. Hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] |Sent: 17 November 2004 17:42 |To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |Subject: any rules for RelayCountry? | | |I'm looking to use the RelayCountry plugin data but there |doesn't seem to be any rules. Anybody know of any? | |Specifically l

Problem after upgrading Spam Assassin to 3.0.1

Hello, I am new to mailing lists and Linux so please excuse some of the mistakes I know I am going to make. I just started working at this company and their mail server was already setup. Recently my boss was complaining that he is receiving a lot of spam now. I saw that the last release came o

any rules for RelayCountry?

I'm looking to use the RelayCountry plugin data but there doesn't seem to be any rules. Anybody know of any? Specifically looking to score mail that has passed through AR or LB. Thanks -- Eric A. Hallhttp://www.ehsco.com/ Internet Core Protocols

[OT] Amavisd memory usage

This is off topic and I apologize, but I really couldn't think of a better place to ask. I'm using Postfix 2.1.5/Amavisd 2.1.2/SA 3.01, and I just noticed something odd. Looking at top, the 5 copies of amavisd (I pre-spawn 4) have different memory usage numbers, with the oldest amavis using the mo

Re: Custom Russian ruleset?

Pierre Thomson wrote: Well... Bayes certainly works on Russian words. Most Russian spam is correctly recognized by my Bayes-enabled SpamAssassin. If you DON'T want any Russian email you can make a rule for the Cyrillic character set, but to write custom rules against Russian spam would be diff

RE: Custom Russian ruleset?

Well... Bayes certainly works on Russian words. Most Russian spam is correctly recognized by my Bayes-enabled SpamAssassin. If you DON'T want any Russian email you can make a rule for the Cyrillic character set, but to write custom rules against Russian spam would be difficult. Pierre Thomson

Re: Custom Russian ruleset?

Kjetil Kjernsmo wrote: Hi! I was wondering whether someone has a custom Russian ruleset? I have a user who reads Russian, and allthough I don't think he does write with any Russians now, I don't want to block the language. There is a significant amount of Russian spam getting through though, so

Re: kinda OT procmailrc

On 17 Nov 2004 Alex Pleiner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: * ChupaCabra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-11-16 17:11]: #:0: #* ^Subject:.*[SPAM] #$HOME/probably-spam/ Consider quoting the brackets: * ^Subject: \[SPAM\] Hopefully that will solve the problem, but in addition I recommend that you change these

RE: spamd logging with wrong timestamp?

Dimitry Peisakhov wrote: > Hi guys, > >I've recently discovered that my spamd is writing to the logs with > the incorrect timestamp. It looks like its using GMT to timestamp > instead of the actual time on the box (11hr difference). I fixed this > previously by restarting the service, but its

Custom Russian ruleset?

Hi! I was wondering whether someone has a custom Russian ruleset? I have a user who reads Russian, and allthough I don't think he does write with any Russians now, I don't want to block the language. There is a significant amount of Russian spam getting through though, so a Russian ruleset wo

Re: kinda OT procmailrc

* ChupaCabra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-11-16 17:11]: > Is it not kosher to have both a /etc/procmailrc and a $USER/.procmailrc > #:0: > #* ^Subject:.*[SPAM] > #$HOME/probably-spam/ Consider quoting the brackets: * ^Subject: \[SPAM\] Alex -- Alex Pleinerzeitform In

Re: Tuning SpamAssassin

Dimitry any RBL's in the SA setup? If so are you using a local caching nameserver or zone-tranfering from the RBL - either may help. using a MailScanner, sendmail, SA combo that machine should be able to shift close to 750,000 messages a day easy. It's also been noted that zmailer had tons more

spamd logging with wrong timestamp?

Hi guys, I've recently discovered that my spamd is writing to the logs with the incorrect timestamp. It looks like its using GMT to timestamp instead of the actual time on the box (11hr difference). I fixed this previously by restarting the service, but its not doing the trick now.. Anyone have

HUMOR: Aol Commercial?

Not sure if this has been posted before.. http://www.espphotography.com/funnyshit/aol.avi - parody commercial of AOL. Hysterical. but warning: Adult content. I have some more funny videos at http://www.espphotography.com/funnyshit/ . Most are from ebaumsworld.com - great site. If any represent

Re: Some default rules (X_MESSAGE_INFO) weighted too heavily

At 03:06 PM 11/16/2004 -0600, Guyang Mao wrote: One problem is when the piece of mail enters DCC (since Microsoft lists have a HUGE distribution their mail is pretty much guaranteed to be listed in DCC, as I understand it) and is scored an additional 2.2. As far as I can tell DCC does not distingu

Re: Some default rules (X_MESSAGE_INFO) weighted too heavily

Hello Guyang, Tuesday, November 16, 2004, 1:06:30 PM, you wrote: GM> I have a Hotmail account, through which I'm subscribed to various Microsoft GM> mailing lists such as security updates, MSDN information, MCP lists, etc. GM> Microsoft's bulk mailer adds a X-Message-Info header. I fetch this ma

RE: Re: Tuning SpamAssassin

I tried doing this on my Spamassassin 3.0.1, Postfix2, Redhat Enterprise box on dual 1.5ghz xeon 1gb memory hardware, and i'm not sure if it made any difference. I;ve been quite disappointed with spamd performance on a box with that much grunt (?). During peak times we get hit with about 1msg/sec