Is there any way a LINUX box can be configured to solve the problem of checking the mail contents of every http that passes through the linux box?
Regards.
Cigan.
Moving house? Beach bar in Thailand? New Wardrobe? Win £10k with Yahoo! Mail to make your dream a reality.
On Sat, 13 Nov 2004, Peter P. Benac wrote:
> You could stand over their shoulders?
>
> I really doubt that any real spammer will use a cybercafé to send spam.
> These idiots use software that generate messages and send them thru any open
> relay they can find. Just because the reply to address sa
Hello,
I have attached a message that has got 9.9 points.
Is this score assinged by the default or by a custom configuration?
-Hanspeter
- Forwarded message from Drew Tomlinson <> -
From: Drew Tomlinson <>
To: FreeBSD Questions
Subject: SPAM(9.9) shutdown -r Hangs After Upgra
Hi,
I am new to this list, so please be gentle :-)
I have installed the MSExec.pm Plug-In to SpamAssassin 3.0 on Debian.
SpamAssassin is called via procmal, individually per user.
The Plug-In works fine.
During testing, I found that I get executable content using the MIME
type 'x-msdownload' ins
Hi all,
I have been upgrading to SA 3.01 this weekend and i am impressed by the amount
of spam it stops! Great job!
At this moment i use the SuSE 9.2 distro.
I noticed that DCC and Pyzor are broken if beeing called from SA.
(Nov 14 17:00:07 beast dccproc[4795]: missing message body; fatal error)
On Sat, 13 Nov 2004, Cigan Segun wrote:
> My office runs a cybercafe. Customers are only allowed to use web based
> mail like yahoo, hotmail, excite, etc and NOT outlook express or any
> other mail clients.
> The problem: what can I do to check all their mails in order to stop the
> ones that are
Hi,
It's been awhile since i've participated on the list. I've just
attempted to scour the entire net trying to find some information on
this, but I Haven't found anything.
I've just installed SpamAssassin 3.01 in conjunction with MIMEDefang
2.48 on a redhat enterprise server 3.0 machine.
Th
On Saturday, November 13, 2004, 7:45:51 PM, Frank Ellermann wrote:
> Jeff Chan wrote:
>> Setting up and tearing down separate test lists involves
>> some overhead. And eventually multi will need to expand
>> beyond the last octet.
> I'll believe it when I see it (the expansion of "multi" ;-)
We
On Saturday, November 13, 2004, 7:41:23 PM, Chris Chris wrote:
> I've a question about setting up the spamcop_to_address. In the ::conf
> documentation it states:
> "Your customized SpamCop report submission address. You need to obtain this
> address by registering at "http://www.spamcop.net/"
On Wed, 2004-11-10 at 19:03 -0800, Mike McMullen wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> > At 07:33 PM 11/10/2004, Mike McMullen wrote:
> > >I have a server where I have installed SA 3.0 via the downloaded zip file
> > >on the
> > >SA home page.
>
I've a question about setting up the spamcop_to_address. In the ::conf
documentation it states:
"Your customized SpamCop report submission address. You need to obtain this
address by registering at "http://www.spamcop.net/";.
I assume this means paying for an account at spamcop, not just regi
On Saturday, November 13, 2004, 6:20:40 PM, Steven Stern wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Nov 2004 18:11:11 -0800, Jeff Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>However redhat.com is not on any SURBLs. Perhaps we should ask
>>you to give some debugging info to the developers?
> I'd be happy to. What information is
On Sat, 13 Nov 2004 18:11:11 -0800, Jeff Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>However redhat.com is not on any SURBLs. Perhaps we should ask
>you to give some debugging info to the developers?
I'd be happy to. What information is relevant?
Using SA 3.0.1 on FC3 with no additional rulesets added.
-
On Saturday, November 13, 2004, 6:06:58 PM, Steven Stern wrote:
> What's the best way to clear the name of an important web site?
Send a note to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or the source list as
described at:
http://www.surbl.org/lists.html
> Why are these RBLs listing redhat.com?
> Content analysis de
What's the best way to clear the name of an important web site?
Why are these RBLs listing redhat.com?
Content analysis details: (8.3 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
-- --
-2.6 BAYES_00
On Saturday, November 13, 2004, 4:28:52 AM, Jeff Chan wrote:
> OK as advertised, here are some results of looking at the
> intersections of different lists and seeing how many of
> the blocklist DNS queries they are responsible for:
> [sc][ws][ob][jp] 767 records of 82587 68084 hits of 232031 is
You sent three messages to the list in a row without indicating
if the earlier problems are solved or if the three are actually
connected. Don't you think that your problems are connected
somehow? You seem to have upgraded from SA 2.6x to 3.0. I assume
you either have a mixed setup now or you n
17 matches
Mail list logo
