On Saturday, November 13, 2004, 9:23:34 AM, Frank Ellermann wrote:
> Jeff Chan wrote:
> That's probably too KISS for you, and if you'd add the not
> yet used 7th multi bit it would result in 7 over 3 (any 3
> out of 7) combinations, 99 result codes if I got it right.
> (35 + 35 + 21 + 7 + 1 = 99,
Nix wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Nov 2004, Larry stipulated:
> > You could comment out the "spamcop_to_address" in your configuration
> > file. Then SA will report to the "generic" spamcop address. Your
> > reports won't be given as much weight (whatever that means) but you
> > won't get the confirmation
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004, Larry stipulated:
> You could comment out the "spamcop_to_address" in your configuration
> file. Then SA will report to the "generic" spamcop address. Your
> reports won't be given as much weight (whatever that means) but you
> won't get the confirmation emails either.
... a
You could stand over their shoulders?
I really doubt that any real spammer will use a cybercafé to send spam.
These idiots use software that generate messages and send them thru any open
relay they can find. Just because the reply to address says hotmail.com or
yahoo.com doesn't necessarily me
Thank you everybody.
My office runs a cybercafe. Customers are only allowed to use web based mail like yahoo, hotmail, excite, etc and NOT outlook express or any other mail clients.
The problem: what can I do to check all their mails in order to stop the ones that are spams?
Thank you all, on
I'm getting this error in the spamd logfile:
2004-11-13 18:33:43 [54661] i: Subroutine COPY_ACCURATELY_body_test redefined
at
/usr/local/share/spamassassin/20_phrases.cf, rule COPY_ACCURATELY, line 10,
line 85.
I have upgraded to SA 3.0.1
spamd is running as
spamd -d -c
/etc/mail/spama
I'm getting this error in the spamd logfile:
2004-11-13 17:32:05 [54661] i: processing message
<3698158.1100366389516.JavaMai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for vlb:1001.
2004-11-13 17:32:05 [54661] i: error: Insecure dependency in eval while
running
setuid at
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5/Mail/SpamAss
I have upgraded to SA 3.0.1
spamd is running as
spamd -d -c
/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf contains
allow_user_rules 1
my user prefs file contains
use_terse_report1
ok_languagesen
report_safe 0
According to my Procmail log
I have upgraded to SA 3.0.1
I read the upgrading document
I built the new SA, ran the tests, turned off the old spamd, the (old)
sa-learn --rebuild
installed SA 3.0.1, ran the (new) sa-learn --sync and got this:
Argument "RBL" isn't numeric in addition (+) at
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5/
Hi,
Justin Mason wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
there's been a few reports of this, but we're really mystified.
A test case would help, but it doesn't seem easily reproducable
for anyone :(
- --j.
You could add a fragment like this to spamd (introducing a dependency on
Proc::P
On 12 Nov 2004 Cigan Segun ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
To be specific on my question, I want to be able to scan all messages
or mails sent to & fro using yahoo or hotmail or any of these known web
based addresses!
I do not have a mail server in my local network yet.
We all use web based mails.
Can
On Saturday, November 13, 2004, 12:14:24 AM, Jeff Chan wrote:
> And I have another technique I can use here: Take the lists
> and permutations of lists then see what percentage of each of
> those hit DNS queries matching blocklists in general. Recall
> that we now have statistics about whitelist,
On Friday, November 12, 2004, 7:07:29 AM, Frank Ellermann wrote:
> See Ryan's answer, it's easy to do interesting stuff
> with the multi bits, multi was a good idea. If you
> want to simplify it set bit 1 if 3 or more other bits
> are set, examples:
127.0.0.6 =>> 127.0.0.6 (2 or less bits unc
Cigan,
What you want is what was mentioned here before. WebSense or
SurfControl will and can prevent people from using Web Based mail products
like Hotmail, or Yahoo. Filtering their mail is not going to work. If they
are using Yahoo or Hotmail for business then they need to directed to
Hi!
Sorry if thist is FAQ. I checked but I may missed it.
I have two machines, each one running spamassassin on a different
e-mail. One of them is now pretty trained. Is it possible to merge the
bayes files from both machines?
Thanks,
Edésio
Hello Cigan,
Friday, November 12, 2004, 1:15:57 PM, you wrote:
CS> To be specific on my question, I want to be able to scan all
CS> messages or mails sent to & fro using yahoo or hotmail or any of
CS> these known web based addresses!
CS> What are the tools?
CS> Can spamassasin do that? How c
Matt Kettler wrote:
At 04:45 AM 11/12/2004, Hanspeter Roth wrote:
> Besides adjusting your administrator with a clue-by-four, you can
run it
> through spamassassin --remove-markup
I don't know what you mean by 'clue-by-four'. I try to contact the
admin. But he might have some reason for his setti
On Thursday, November 11, 2004, 10:35:02 PM, Jeff Chan wrote:
> As of 12 November 2004, we have added data from
> fraud.rhs.mailpolice.com into ph, joining our exiting phishing
> data from mailsecurity.net.au.
I should add, this means if you were testing
fraud.rhs.mailpolice.com as a separate list
Yang Xiao wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 11:52:17 -1200, Kevin W. Gagel
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I haven't even bothered to read the article on the link.
>> Why? Because I am not going to chase after a spammer that is
>> sending spam to a free email account who's log files I do
>> not have acc
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 11:52:17 -1200, Kevin W. Gagel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I haven't even bothered to read the article on the link.
> Why? Because I am not going to chase after a spammer that is
> sending spam to a free email account who's log files I do
> not have access to. I don't have a le
20 matches
Mail list logo
