|-Original Message-
|From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Sent: 01 November 2004 23:17
|To: Spamassassin
|Subject: Re: Error after upgrading to 3.0.1
|
|On Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 11:17:02PM -, marti wrote:
|> ERROR! spamassassin script is v3.00, but using modules
|v3.00
Nov 1 17:38:42 mailhost spamd[15700]: Use of uninitialized value in
numeric lt (<) at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/SPF.pm line 204,
line 52.
Nov 1 17:38:42 mailhost spamd[15700]: Use of uninitialized value in
concatenation (.) or string at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl
On Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 11:17:02PM -, marti wrote:
> ERROR! spamassassin script is v3.00, but using modules v3.01!
>
> Any idea what scrip its refering to, spamassassin --lint -D worked just
> fine, but cant fire up spamd.
It's a fail-safe. It means you are trying to use the spamass
After upgrading from 3.0.0 to the latest version I get the following error:-
ERROR! spamassassin script is v3.00, but using modules v3.01!
Any idea what scrip its refering to, spamassassin --lint -D worked just
fine, but cant fire up spamd.
Martin
On Mon, 01 Nov 2004 11:54:50 -0800, Justin Mason wrote
> BTW the default CFLAGS are coming from whatever perl was built with;
> so I'd be worried about bugs in your perl accordingly ;)
That's not where spamc is getting them. They're hard-coded in the configure
script:
ringbill# grep 'O2' -B1 sp
On Monday, November 1, 2004, 2:57:02 PM, Dan Barker wrote:
> Must be interesting, it's over quota and won't render.
> Dan
It's up on the tripod site Justin mentioned:
http://authortravis.tripod.com/
>
> http://www.geocities.com/author_travis/
> very interesting!
> --j.
Jeff C.
--
Mirror of PDF (from Slashdot): http://wetsexygirl.com/WhoWroteSobig.pdf
Seriously.
On Nov 1, 2004, at 2:57 PM, Dan Barker wrote:
Must be interesting, it's over quota and won't render.
Dan
http://www.geocities.com/author_travis/
very interesting!
--j.
--
Tom Collins - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
QmailA
Must be interesting, it's over quota and won't render.
Dan
http://www.geocities.com/author_travis/
very interesting!
--j.
On Monday, November 1, 2004, 2:28:42 PM, Justin Mason wrote:
> http://authortravis.tripod.com/
> http://www.geocities.com/author_travis/
> very interesting!
> --j.
Nice work, whoever the mystery authors are...
Jeff C.
--
Jeff Chan
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.surbl.org/
http://authortravis.tripod.com/
http://www.geocities.com/author_travis/
very interesting!
--j.
At 03:51 PM 11/1/2004, Scott Palmer wrote:
Is there a reason why the memory usage jumped with 3.0.x? I have two
servers running it and I am thinking I might have to upgrade the RAM
because of it.
One thing that springs to mind is the AWL is on by default, unlike 2.6x..
if you don't want it, try us
- Original Message -
> From: "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Juliano Simões" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
> Sent: Monday, November 01, 2004 12:58 PM
> Subject: Re: Bayes sometimes not used
>
> At 06:38 PM 10/31/2004, Juliano Simões wrote:
> >See below sample outputs from subsequent exe
Is there a reason why the memory usage jumped with 3.0.x? I have two
servers running it and I am thinking I might have to upgrade the RAM
because of it.
Is there anything that can be done to reduce the usage. I thought that
perhaps it was because of Bayes being in SQL. But, one server has it in
SQ
At 03:37 PM 11/1/2004, George Georgalis wrote:
Thanks, I've added that:
skip_rbl_checks 1
use_bayes 0
noautolearn 1
use_auto_whitelist 0
score AWL 0.001
I've seen lots of people using the score statement on AWL. However, I
myself have serious doubts about the validity of doing that. The AWL
doesn
On Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 03:13:50PM -0500, Matt Kettler wrote:
>At 02:11 PM 11/1/2004, George Georgalis wrote:
>>those false negatives are also growing an AWL, which I also don't want.
>>
>>-1.4 AWLAWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
>>
>>how do I disable and purge any A
At 08:41 AM 11/1/2004, Sauer, Peter wrote:
has anybody a working config for spamassassin whit spf...i got spf
aktive (plugin in init.pre) but i haven't seen any mails spamassassin
does mark whit spf-rules...i am using spamassassin through amvisd-new...
spelling lesson of the day... repeat after me:
At 02:11 PM 11/1/2004, George Georgalis wrote:
those false negatives are also growing an AWL, which I also don't want.
-1.4 AWLAWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
how do I disable and purge any AWL and ABL generation, too?
Well, there is no "ABL" just one system called
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael Barnes writes:
> On Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 12:24:27PM -0500, David Brodbeck wrote:
> > On Wed, 22 Sep 2004 09:15:48 -0700, Justin Mason wrote
> > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > > Hash: SHA1
> > >
> > > David Brodbeck writes:
> > > > I
Hi,
I am running 2.63 on Red Hat 9. I am invoking with a modified version of
an Advosys script, but it is using spamc.
The issue with whitelists and blacklists. They are working fine. The
problem is that I have blacklisted [EMAIL PROTECTED] and have whitelisted
[EMAIL PROTECTED] The purpose was
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Maul writes:
> This is exactly how i have my system setup. I have a 192.168 IP
> assigned to my server. It has no public IP assigned to it. However, i
> have a router/firewall in front of it which has a public ip assigned to
> its wan interf
On Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 12:24:27PM -0500, David Brodbeck wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Sep 2004 09:15:48 -0700, Justin Mason wrote
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > David Brodbeck writes:
> > > Is there a way to get the SpamAssassin build process to use
> > > -O instead of -O2 wh
On Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 02:22:39PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am trying to use sql config, but it seems quite troublesome to
> receive sql data in the correct order.
>
> Assuming the default config is
> - just tag headers but do not modify message (report_safe 0)
> - no test report in the
>
> >>> Yep, that's right -- and trusted_networks will fix it.
> >>
> >>Yes trusted_networks does indeed fix the issue, but I'm
> still not so
> >>sure that the algorithm to deduce trusted_networks is
> correct (if not
> >>specified).
>
> In any event, how is it disabled? I'm getting false ne
On Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 02:03:36PM -0500, George Georgalis wrote:
>In any event, how is it disabled? I'm getting false negatives...
>
>-2.8 ALL_TRUSTEDDid not pass through any untrusted hosts
>
>In my setup SA doesn't get _any_ trusted network connections, those
>connections are routed
>>> Yep, that's right -- and trusted_networks will fix it.
>>
>>Yes trusted_networks does indeed fix the issue, but I'm still
>>not so sure that the algorithm to deduce trusted_networks is
>>correct (if not specified).
In any event, how is it disabled? I'm getting false negatives...
-2.8 ALL_TRU
Sean Doherty wrote:
Justin,
- if any addresses of the 'by' host is in a reserved network range,
then it's trusted
However, I would have thought that this would imply that the 10.0.0.53
host is trusted and not any servers connecting to it.
The problem is that 10.x is a private net, therefore Sp
- Original Message -
From: "Theo Van Dinter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, October 31, 2004 9:42 PM
Subject: Re: Bayes sometimes not used
> On Sun, Oct 31, 2004 at 09:38:09PM -0200, Juliano Simões wrote:
> > I have noticed a strange behavior of SA, after upgrading from
> > versio
At 01:07 PM 11/1/2004, Sean Doherty wrote:
> The problem is that 10.x is a private net, therefore SpamAssassin infers
> it cannot possibly be the external MX sitting out there on the internet.
> (for a host to be sitting on the public internet accepting SMTP
> connections, it'd obviously need a pub
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sean Doherty writes:
> Justin,
>
> > > - if any addresses of the 'by' host is in a reserved network range,
> > > then it's trusted
> > >
> > > However, I would have thought that this would imply that the 10.0.0.53
> > > host is trusted and not an
Justin,
> > - if any addresses of the 'by' host is in a reserved network range,
> > then it's trusted
> >
> > However, I would have thought that this would imply that the 10.0.0.53
> > host is trusted and not any servers connecting to it.
>
> The problem is that 10.x is a private net, there
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sean Doherty writes:
> I'm looking for some clarification on trusted_networks, the
> ALL_TRUSTED rule, and in particular how trusted_networks are
> inferred if not specified in local.cf.
>
> Since upgrading to 3.0.1 I have seen an increase in false
On Wed, 22 Sep 2004 09:15:48 -0700, Justin Mason wrote
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> David Brodbeck writes:
> > Is there a way to get the SpamAssassin build process to use -O instead of
> > -O2
> > while building spamc? I run FreeBSD on a DEC Alpha, and -O2 triggers
> > o
On Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 07:36:35AM -0500, Dan Barker wrote:
> 1) When I get a spam with autolearn=no in the headers, that means it's
> already been learned.
"no" means autolearning didn't occur, there is no way to know why it didn't do
so unless you check the debug output.
> 2) There is no need t
The announcement for SA 3 mentioned that anti-fraud rules from Matt Yackley
had been added, so when I upgraded I removed the 9_sare_fraud ruleset.
However, I've noticed that some lotto scams were getting through.
Just testing with on that didn't trigger any standard fraud rules, it did
trigge
At 06:38 PM 10/31/2004, Juliano Simões wrote:
See below sample outputs from subsequent executions of
"/usr/bin/spamassassin -tLD < spam_msg_file":
since you're using -D for debug output, is there anything in the debug that
might give some clues?
Do both use the same score set?
Any complaints abou
Hi,
I am trying to use sql config, but it seems quite troublesome to receive sql
data in
the correct order.
Assuming the default config is
- just tag headers but do not modify message (report_safe 0)
- no test report in the header (remove_header Report)
and a user wants to turn the reports on, t
At 07:36 AM 11/1/2004 -0500, Dan Barker wrote:
1) When I get a spam with autolearn=no in the headers, that means it's
already been learned.
Not entirely true... It could mean it was already learned, but autolearn=no
could also mean the score wasn't high enough.
in 2.6x it could also mean t
hi
has anybody a working config for spamassassin whit spf...i got spf
aktive (plugin in init.pre) but i haven't seen any mails spamassassin
does mark whit spf-rules...i am using spamassassin through amvisd-new...
Hi,
I'm looking for some clarification on trusted_networks, the
ALL_TRUSTED rule, and in particular how trusted_networks are
inferred if not specified in local.cf.
Since upgrading to 3.0.1 I have seen an increase in false
negatives, which would have otherwise been caught if not for
the ALL_TRU
Group, please comment on or correct these two statements.
1) When I get a spam with autolearn=no in the headers, that means it's
already been learned.
2) There is no need to sa-learn --spam that message, it's already learned
but simply didn't meet the threshold.
Dan
Hi!
Lint output: Relative score without previous setting in SpamAssassin
configuration, skipping: score VIRUS_WARNING412
Unhelpful 'virus
warning' (412)
Just for clarification, after this update:
Lint fails on 3.0.1 here
Lint does not fail for 2.6.3 here.
Noticed the same here.
Bye,
Raymond.
Alan Munday wrote:
Just for clarification, after this update:
Lint fails on 3.0.1 here
Lint does not fail for 2.6.3 here.
Yes, sorry - mine's 3.01 too.
Mike.
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Zanker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, November 01, 2004 6:43 AM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Lint fails on latest bogus0virus-warnings.cf
>
>
> From RulesDuJour last night:
>
> Lint output: Relative score without previous s
- Original Message -
From: "Roel Bindels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I just want the X-spam-flag to be present in the header but not the
report.
> what am I doing wrong.
> See my local.cf below
>
> greetings Roel Bindels
>
> rewrite_subject 0
> report_safe 0
> report_header 0
> use_terse_repo
- Original Message -
From: "Jeff Chan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> > Folks, with some of the nice functionality that the SA devs built
into
> > the
> >> > URIDNSBL plug-in (see
> >> >
> >
http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.0.x/dist/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Plugin_URIDNSBL.html),
> >> > you c
I noticed that the devs included the above experimental SenderBase tests
with SA 3.0.x, so I enabled them a few weeks ago and have found them to work
quite nicely. The SB_NEW_BULK test has a much higher hit ratio, and
provides more accurate results than the SB_NSP_VOLUME_SPIKE test does, but
both
Dear Listers,
I just want the X-spam-flag to be present in the header but not the report.
what am I doing wrong.
See my local.cf below
greetings Roel Bindels
rewrite_subject 0
report_safe 0
report_header 0
use_terse_report
required_hits 5.0
use_bayes 1
auto_learn
On Sunday, October 31, 2004, 11:24:33 PM, Bill Landry wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Alex Broens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > Folks, with some of the nice functionality that the SA devs built into
> the
>> > URIDNSBL plug-in (see
>> >
> http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.0.x/dist/
- Original Message -
From: "Alex Broens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Folks, with some of the nice functionality that the SA devs built into
the
> > URIDNSBL plug-in (see
> >
http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.0.x/dist/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Plugin_URIDNSBL.html),
> > you can do cool things
From RulesDuJour last night:
Lint output: Relative score without previous setting in SpamAssassin
configuration, skipping: score VIRUS_WARNING412 Unhelpful 'virus
warning' (412)
Thanks,
Mike.
Folks, with some of the nice functionality that the SA devs built into the
URIDNSBL plug-in (see
http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.0.x/dist/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Plugin_URIDNSBL.html),
you can do cool things like:
=
# URIDNSBL (queries URIs against standard DNSBLs)
uridnsbl URIBL_AH_DNSB
On Sun, Oct 31, 2004 at 09:38:09PM -0200, Juliano Simões wrote:
> I have noticed a strange behavior of SA, after upgrading from
> version 2.64 to 3.0.1. Sometimes, the same message is scored
> with bayes, sometimes not.
Yes, Bayes can't always give an answer. You can run with -D and see what's
go
From: "Duncan Findlay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sorry, Mandrake not Debian. Anyways, change options in
> /etc/sysconfig/spamassassin, I think.
Yeah, in theory that's the best way. But do copy the "SPAMDOPTIONS"
line and then place IT into the /etc/sysconfig/spamassassin. I get
naughty and cheat on t
From: "John Fleming" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > What am I missing? - John
> >
> > OK, from the "spamd --help" output:
> > -m num, --max-children num Allow maximum num children
> >
> > So that option is positively "a spamd thing." So how does one get that
> > option into spamd? On the M
Hi Guys,
I have noticed a strange behavior of SA, after upgrading from
version 2.64 to 3.0.1. Sometimes, the same message is scored
with bayes, sometimes not.
See below sample outputs from subsequent executions of
"/usr/bin/spamassassin -tLD < spam_msg_file":
***
55 matches
Mail list logo
