Title: whitelist_from broken?
whitelist_from in v3 seems inconsistant. after a service restart, it fires correctly about 5 times. after that, it stops working entirely.
anybody else having this issue?
Thanks,
Nate
Title: Documentation generator error
Hi list members,
I've upgraded to SA 3.0, but I've been unsuccessful generating the documentation as directed in http://www.openhandhome.com/howtosa.html. The "POD.BAT" Script runs almost to the end, but then generates two errors,
Pod2html.bat: \lib\
From: "Gregory Zornetzer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Hi all,
>
> I recently installed spamcop 3.0.0 onto my unix account on an SGI IRIX 6.5
> box. I'm using perl 5.8.5, and I generally read my email with pine,
> though sometimes I'll remotely view it using Evolution through the
> machine's IMAP server
Kris Deugau wrote:
You mean, "like Debian stable", or "like RedHat Enterprise Linux" (and
its clones).Both provide security updates, but (almost) NO
functionality changes.
Debian unstable is "whatever's current" (more or less). Fedora Core
fills the same role for RedHat.
Well, if you want to g
Hi all,
I recently installed spamcop 3.0.0 onto my unix account on an SGI IRIX 6.5
box. I'm using perl 5.8.5, and I generally read my email with pine,
though sometimes I'll remotely view it using Evolution through the
machine's IMAP server.
The following is a portion of my .procmailrc file that
Title: Auto learn as Ham when ALL_TRUSTED?
Looks like others are posting this question as well, but I couldn't see it in the archives...
I recently upgraded to v3. Everything looks great so far, except one change that I can't seem to figure out.
We have an internal Exchange server, and S
On Fri, 2004-09-24 at 15:17, John Andersen wrote:
> It seems to be working here Alex:
> ...
> Are you sure it was started with autolearn support turned on?
> (I think it is the default)...
Yes, it is turned on. Normally, learning from
>
> With SA 3.0, using clear_headers in local.cf does not prevent
> the "X-Spam-Report:" header from being inserted into spam
> messages. Is this
> a bug or a feature? Below is my local.cf.
>
I did not confirm X-Spam-Report, but you cant get rid of
X-Checker-Version: headers with clear_heade
I changed the path just in case. It was that way as a mistake anyhow.
Here is the output of lint. (it is exactly the same as with the other
paths so I am sure that is not the issue.) Note that it works there.
Although not when run through procmail. I think your idea about users is
on to somethi
As a another good step, just SA scan ALL incoming and outgoing mail.
Run a vulnerability scan against your server, nessus or sara against your
machine to find what is being exploited.
--
Luke Computer Science System Administrator
Security Administrator,College of Engineering
Montana State Univer
At 04:10 PM 9/24/2004, Thomas Bolioli wrote:
I do not believe that is an issue. It only puts the bayes databases at
~/.spammer_toks and ~/.spammer_seen. sa-learn has not had a problem
loading the databases. They have grown everytime I have used it. I can't
see why spamd would have a problem with
On Friday 24 September 2004 03:52 am, Alex S Moore wrote:
> Since upgrading to 3.0, which is the greatest BTW, I have not had any
> spam auto-learned. The keywords are correct and running spamassassin
> with --lint reveals all is ok.
>
> Is anyone else seeing this?
>
> Alex
It seems to be working
I do not believe that is an issue. It only puts the bayes databases at
~/.spammer_toks and ~/.spammer_seen. sa-learn has not had a problem
loading the databases. They have grown everytime I have used it. I can't
see why spamd would have a problem with it.
Tom
Matt Kettler wrote:
At 03:40 PM 9/2
Anthony Edwards wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 02:37:31PM -0400, Kris Deugau wrote:
> > Justin Mason wrote:
> > > Yeah -- this is almost definitely something to do with SuSE's
> > > packaging of either perl (if it uses the defaults from
> > > ExtUtils::MakeMaker) or SpamAssassin itself (if its
At 03:40 PM 9/24/2004, Thomas Bolioli wrote:
bayes_path ~/.spammer
This statement is invalid if a directory named ".spammer" exists in the
user's home..
Please read the docs on bayes_path VERY carefully. Despite being named
"path" it's really "path, plus filename prefix".
Thus bayes_path should
I am having a problem with 2.63 not using bayes. (NB: setup is using
individual data and triggering using .4ward, procmail and postfix with
no individual .sa and .procmail files) I have trained each of three
accounts with over 1000 ham and some 48K spam messages. SA is working
and tagging spam
On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 02:37:31PM -0400, Kris Deugau wrote:
> Justin Mason wrote:
> > Yeah -- this is almost definitely something to do with SuSE's
> > packaging of either perl (if it uses the defaults from
> > ExtUtils::MakeMaker) or SpamAssassin itself (if its rpm spec moves
> > the file around
On Friday 24 September 2004 08:52 am, Justin Mason wrote:
> Bob Apthorpe writes:
> > On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 01:30:19 -0800 John Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > > If you are thinking about installing Spamassasin 3.0 PAY ATTENTION:
> > >
> > > If you haven't been reading this list carefully yo
Justin Mason wrote:
> Yeah -- this is almost definitely something to do with SuSE's
> packaging of either perl (if it uses the defaults from
> ExtUtils::MakeMaker) or SpamAssassin itself (if its rpm spec moves
> the file around as Debian does).
Actually, for any "real" package manager (ie, rpm or
I just started using a postfix/mailscanner/SA setup to filter outbound
and inbound mail. Currently scanning about 35k messages per day. I'm a
long time windows user / short time linux user, but had no problem
getting it setup and running. I'm happy with the results, that's for
sure.
> -Or
> On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 11:36:27 -0400 (EDT) "Dan Mahoney, System Admin"
> > The person running 1.2.3.4 has NO CLUE what they are doing.
> > 1.2.3.4 should RDNS to whatever the "hostname" value of that
> > machine is. This should be the same as the HELO the machine uses
> > when talking out to the o
Just have a question regarding storing Bayes in SQL with Spamassassin
3.0. I already converted the old dbm files and such, everything is
working good, question I have is performance and token count. Previously
I had set the max db size to 25 tokens via the
bayes_expiry_max_db_size config op
We run a bunch of Win32 mail servers on our network. These servers
already have spam and virus filtering for local email delivery.
However, when a mailbox has it's mail forwarded off-net, the mail is
not filtered. As such, when a local users forwards their mailbox to
AOL, they then read their ema
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Will Yardley writes:
> Has anyone else seen a problem w/ spamd dying sometimes (after working
> for a while)? I have been seeing this in the 3.0 rcs. I'm about to
> upgrade to 3.0 release, but I'm wondering if anyone else has seen this.
>
> Much more
Has anyone else seen a problem w/ spamd dying sometimes (after working
for a while)? I have been seeing this in the 3.0 rcs. I'm about to
upgrade to 3.0 release, but I'm wondering if anyone else has seen this.
Much more detailed information in bug #3667 (bugzilla.spamassassin.org)
On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 03:04:58AM +0100, Anthony Edwards wrote:
> I removed all SpamAssassin files earlier this evening and re-installed
> using cpan. With hindsight, I believe I could have simply done what
> you have suggested above. I run a SuSE 8.2 system, and persuading
> manual configurat
At 12:44 PM 9/24/2004, Matt Garretson wrote:
With SA 3.0, using clear_headers in local.cf does not prevent the
"X-Spam-Report:" header from being inserted into spam messages. Is this
a bug or a feature? Below is my local.cf.
### +++
required_score 8.0
clear_headers
report_safe 0
It's parsing ord
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bob Apthorpe writes:
> On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 01:30:19 -0800 John Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > If you are thinking about installing Spamassasin 3.0 PAY ATTENTION:
> >
> > If you haven't been reading this list carefully you will
> > have m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jay Ehrhart writes:
> The non-deliverable reports are coming from my Linux apache user.
> Non-deliverables usually come from root. I am running apache on the server
> with forms. The forms software is the latest version and patches.
>
> Can anybody
With SA 3.0, using clear_headers in local.cf does not prevent the
"X-Spam-Report:" header from being inserted into spam messages. Is this
a bug or a feature? Below is my local.cf.
### +++
required_score 8.0
clear_headers
report_safe 0
use_dcc 0
use_pyzor 0
use_razor2 0
dns_available yes
use_bay
Some system on your internal network is "owned" by a hacker network. It
is time to clean all your windows machines COMPLETELY of viruses.
{^_^}
- Original Message -
From: "Jay Ehrhart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> This morning I had over 7000 emails in my Linux server's outbound queue
> which
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 11:36:27 -0400 (EDT) "Dan Mahoney, System Admin" <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> The person running 1.2.3.4 has NO CLUE what they are doing. 1.2.3.4
> should RDNS to whatever the "hostname" value of that machine is. This
> should be the same as the HELO the machine use
--On Friday, September 24, 2004 11:33 AM -0400 Steve Prior
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In case anyone else is going to run into this, sometime
yesterday speakeasy.net implemented default SPF records
for all of their DNS hosting customers.
I don't see it for the two domains they host for me. I did
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, Joe Smith wrote:
*This message was transferred with a trial version of CommuniGate(tm) Pro*
I'm using SpamAssassin 3.0 when I use whitelist_from_rcvd with domain names
that reverse to only one possible domain it works just as it should. When the
domain name is one that has mu
In case anyone else is going to run into this, sometime
yesterday speakeasy.net implemented default SPF records
for all of their DNS hosting customers.
The problem is that they did it badly. No notification
whatsoever was sent out that they were doing this and no
chance to review (or even change a
Joe Smith wrote:
> I'm using SpamAssassin 3.0 when I use whitelist_from_rcvd with domain
> names that reverse to only one possible domain it works just as it
> should. When the domain name is one that has multiple possibilities
> that it can reverse dns to then it doesn't work unless it happens to
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004, David Gibbs wrote:
I have a number of email addresses that get only spam, so I've set them up as
spamtraps.
They are simply sendmail aliases that send to "| /usr/bin/spamassassin -r".
When I manually run the spamassassin -r command, however, I get the
following...
$cat samp
I have a number of email addresses that get only spam, so I've set them
up as spamtraps.
They are simply sendmail aliases that send to "| /usr/bin/spamassassin -r".
When I manually run the spamassassin -r command, however, I get the
following...
$cat sample-spam.txt | spamassassin -r
Pyzor -> r
At 10:39 AM 9/24/2004, Jay Ehrhart wrote:
This morning I had over 7000 emails in my Linux server's outbound queue
which I deleted. My firewall log shows over 20,000 emails went out with a
SunTrust bank announce saying to login and enter your username and password.
I do not see the emails coming in
* Jay Ehrhart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> This morning I had over 7000 emails in my Linux server's outbound queue
> which I deleted. My firewall log shows over 20,000 emails went out with a
> SunTrust bank announce saying to login and enter your username and password.
> I do not see the emails coming
This question isn't really appropriate to a SpamAssassin forum.
For what it's worth, it sounds like someone exploited an Apache vuln on
your system and installed a mail generator. Given the severity of this
(ie you are sending out thousands of email phishing frauds) you should
probably take th
I feel like I need to add, for the sake of others, that its a bad idea
to allow outside access to these two email addresses. Internal users,
or perhaps even just a few trusted individuals should be able to send
to these two addresses, but not the general internet population. I'm
guessing the reas
This morning I had over 7000 emails in my Linux server's outbound queue
which I deleted. My firewall log shows over 20,000 emails went out with a
SunTrust bank announce saying to login and enter your username and password.
I do not see the emails coming in like I would in a relay. How can I stop
Hi!
I'm trying to use pop3proxy with SA3, but I cannot see the x-spam headers.
Here is some more info.
I did a clean install of Activestate Perl 5.8.4.810 and SA3, following
instructions at http://www.openhandhome.com/howtosa300.html .
Spamassassin works: if I fire up a command prompt and typ
Gee, Chris, you're still sending to incubator. Spamassassin graduated!
Congratulations on the donation.
{^_-}
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Santerre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Just got an email from our Host of SARE. They got their first donation and
> wait for it..yes.it e
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 07:49:48 -0500, Bob Apthorpe wrote
> On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 01:30:19 -0800 John Andersen
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > If you are thinking about installing Spamassasin 3.0 PAY ATTENTION:
> >
> > If you haven't been reading this list carefully you will
> > have missed the f
On Friday, September 24, 2004, 6:59:37 AM, Chris Santerre wrote:
> Just got an email from our Host of SARE. They got their first donation and
> wait for it..yes.it ended in .37 cents!! Wooot! LOL!!!
> A.C. made the donataion. You rock bro! Shows you paid attention ;)
> Our hosts accou
Hello,
Is the -f "Cause spamc to safe-failover if it can't connect to spamd" from
SA2.64 became a standard in SA3.0?
He is removed from the man-pages and I couldn't find anything about it in
the Changes.
After testing it seems to be enabled by default
Should I remove the option from my spamc ca
Just got an email from our Host of SARE. They got their first donation and
wait for it..yes.it ended in .37 cents!! Wooot! LOL!!!
A.C. made the donataion. You rock bro! Shows you paid attention ;)
Our hosts accounting dept will keep wondering, "Why .37 cents?" I love
screwing with peo
At 04:37 AM 9.24.2004 -0400, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
>I've gotten a Makefile mostly tuned for sa3, based on the FreeBSD port
>makefile for 2.64. I've added most of the dependencies, but FreeBSD
>doesn't have ports for Net::SMTP or IP::Country::Fast, so those two
>features can't be auto
At 07:41 AM 9/24/2004, Chris Connell wrote:
Hi,
I have installed spamassassin 3.0 on an email gateway, I noticed on a
debug it threw out an error with the line
check_mx_attempts 0
config: SpamAssassin failed to parse line, skipping: check_mx_attempts 0
Is this option disabled or removed in 3.0?
Lo
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 01:30:19 -0800 John Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you are thinking about installing Spamassasin 3.0 PAY ATTENTION:
>
> If you haven't been reading this list carefully you will
> have missed the fact that spamd has been moved
> from /usr/sbin/ to /usr/bin . Howev
On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 01:30:19AM -0800, John Andersen wrote:
> If you are thinking about installing Spamassasin 3.0 PAY ATTENTION:
>
> If you haven't been reading this list carefully you will
> have missed the fact that spamd has been moved
> from /usr/sbin/ to /usr/bin . However, the old ve
Since upgrading to 3.0, which is the greatest BTW, I have not had any
spam auto-learned. The keywords are correct and running spamassassin
with --lint reveals all is ok.
Is anyone else seeing this?
Alex
Hi,
I have installed spamassassin 3.0 on an email gateway, I noticed on a
debug it threw out an error with the line
check_mx_attempts 0
config: SpamAssassin failed to parse line, skipping: check_mx_attempts 0
Is this option disabled or removed in 3.0?
Secondly, I have installed pyzor 0.4.0 but
Hi Thomas Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
you wrote on Friday, 2004-09-24 08:49:31 +0200:
> Hi Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> you wrote on Thursday, 2004-09-23 17:00:08 -0400:
> > NoMailAudit doesn't exist in 3.0. It looks like you're using old modules
> > and/or old scripts.
> >
> > Nuke an
If you are thinking about installing Spamassasin 3.0 PAY ATTENTION:
If you haven't been reading this list carefully you will
have missed the fact that spamd has been moved
from /usr/sbin/ to /usr/bin . However, the old version remains
in /usr/sbin which is often where your scripts expect to fi
I've gotten a Makefile mostly tuned for sa3, based on the FreeBSD port
makefile for 2.64. I've added most of the dependencies, but FreeBSD
doesn't have ports for Net::SMTP or IP::Country::Fast, so those two
features can't be auto-installed unless the ports maintainer comes up with
them.
I'm a
I am working on creating a drop-in replacement for the FreeBSD port,
although it is likely the committers will create their own in due time.
-Dan
--
I want to see how you see.
-SK, 6/2/99, 4:30 AM
Dan Mahoney
Techie, Sysadmin, WebGeek
Gushi on efnet/undernet IRC
ICQ: 13735144
Hi Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
you wrote on Thursday, 2004-09-23 17:00:08 -0400:
> NoMailAudit doesn't exist in 3.0. It looks like you're using old modules
> and/or old scripts.
>
> Nuke anything spamassassin related, then install 3.0.0.
I renamed ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs and /etc/ma
On Thursday, September 23, 2004, 11:54:14 AM, Sandy S wrote:
> I did find these lines in the debug output:
> debug: URIDNSBL: domains to query: tvuu.wneiis-MUNGEDplanet.info
> dkcw.wneiis-MUNGEDplanet.info
> and
> debug: URIDNSBL: queries completed: 0 started: 0
> debug: URIDNSBL: queries a
How about getting more people to use SURBLs, so once the spam
sites get listed, they get a lot less traffic? The silent
treatment may be better.
Jeff C.
--
Jeff Chan
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.surbl.org/
--On Thursday, September 23, 2004 12:34 PM -0700 Will Yardley
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So what happens when said site is hosted by a legitimate web host which
acts on complaints? You end up driving up said hosting company's
bandwidth bills and (more importantly) very likely taking down other
si
On Thursday, September 23, 2004, 10:22:03 AM, Ulysses Cruz wrote:
> Ironically, my system marked your post as spam specifically because of the
> URIBLs.
Usually it's recommended to not process anti-spam mailing list
messages with anti-spam tools for this reason.
Jeff C.
--
Jeff Chan
mailto:[EMAI
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, Jack L. Stone wrote:
Does anyone know who is handling the update of the FBSD ports for the new
SA-3 release? Or better yet, when it is scheduled?
The ports tree is currently frozen in preparation for Freebsd 5.3-Release,
so it may be a while.
(I recently asked when bind 9.3.0
On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 08:33:50PM -0500, Jack L. Stone wrote:
> Does anyone know who is handling the update of the FBSD ports for the new
> SA-3 release? Or better yet, when it is scheduled?
Last I heard (second-hand from a FBSD dev) was that ports was closed to new
packages at the moment, and th
I do not think this is directly related to spamassassin, but googling
has produced hits all over the map from perl, to Berkeley DB, and none
seem to be recient.
I noticed that spamassassin was not learning after I did an upgrade to
perl 5.8.5. In running sa-learn with a -D I found that DB_File.pm
On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 09:12:18PM +, Brian L. Gentry wrote:
> The fix is obvious and simple: Shut down spamd, start it from the command
> line: /usr/bin/spamd -c -d . Test it. Once you've verified that it's
> working
> again, modify your spamd startup script to use the new location for
Does anyone know who is handling the update of the FBSD ports for the new
SA-3 release? Or better yet, when it is scheduled?
Thanks!
Best regards,
Jack L. Stone,
Administrator
Sage American
http://www.sage-american.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thursday, September 23, 2004, 2:01:58 PM, Theo responded:
TVD> On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 09:35:39AM -0400, Rob Kudyba wrote:
>> /etc/mail/spamassassin root# /usr/bin/spamassassin --lint -D
>> debug: config: read file //etc/mail/spamassassin/70_sare_html.cf
>> debug: config: read file //etc/mail/spam
On Thu, September 23, 2004 10:47, "jenni baier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Does anyone have 3.0 in RPM form? I can't find any links to RPM versions
> on the site...
>
> Thanks in advance...
>
http://ftp.freshrpms.net/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/i386/Fedora/RPMS/spamassassin-3.0-10.i386.rpm
71 matches
Mail list logo
