[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I thought so too...
Well, I don't think the scores are the problem -- they are pretty much
as good as they can get given the training data. I mean the entire
method of putting them into ranges and scoring those ranges.
--
Daniel Quinlan ApacheCon
-Original Message-
From: MEGA MILLION [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2004 1:44 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: SPAM(10.8) CONGRATULATIONS, US$500,000.00 FOR YOU
Spam detection software, running on the system
"antispam.efastunding.com", has identified t
On 16 Sep 2004 13:39:30 -0700, "Daniel Quinlan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> Bart Schaefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Feeding the Bayes rules through the scoring algorithm seems to imply a
> > lack of trust in the accuracy of the classifier.
>
> Mostly not. It's needed to map from the 0 to
Bart Schaefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Feeding the Bayes rules through the scoring algorithm seems to imply a
> lack of trust in the accuracy of the classifier.
Mostly not. It's needed to map from the 0 to 1.0 "probability" to the
SpamAssassin threshold-based scoring method. Even in more p
Hi Josh,
Would you try removing all the lines such as:
[ ${VARIABLE} ] || declare -a VARIABLE;
and then re-running?
I'm clueless what is causing this. I'm not certain that
[ ${PARSE_NEW_VER_SCRIPTS} ] syntax is proper, but it's been working for
me for quite some time.My system is also Debian
Pointers to archived discussion - or, better, some kind of rationale
in the SA documentation - would be fine. I haven't been able to
follow the developers list closely for quite some time.
What I'm curious about is why the BAYES_* rules are fed through the
scoring algorithm along with everything
Chris Santerre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So for anyone who knows what I'm talking about on this page, feel
> free to spam it to all your friends and family! ;)
>
> http://www.rulesemporium.com/rant.html
The really funny thing is that for the first 10 years of my professional
life I ran a help
She looks like the girl from CSI except blonde. Then again, her eyebrows
aren't!
From: Jim Maul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu 9/16/2004 8:32 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: [SARE] Some SARE spam.
Quoting Chris Santerre <[EMAIL PROTECTE
> Does anyone else seriously think that donating to a open
> source project
> should be a tax write off? Or am I the only one??? Would a
> project have to
> become a non profit? I just see sooo many people donating
> things to open
> source, they should at least get a tax break. I mean, I can
>
Jeff Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I certainly agree with a simple [SA} prefix so that the SA emails
> don't get lost and deleted with all the other stuff I get. However,
> this came up a few months ago and the SA list nazis decided that we
> must be too stupid not to have programmed our email
On Thu, 16 Sep 2004, Lucas Albers wrote:
Posting to the usenet seems to be a good way to go about it. Try posting
a few personals to alt.sex.fetish.diapers or something.
Disclaimer:
I'm kidding, of course.
-Dan
Any ideas on how to go through the process of signing up for spam.
Someone stole one
Why not just report the thief to your local law enforcement agency? That
would seem a much more appropriate way to go. After all, the thief could just
get SpamAssassin and never see any of that spam you signed him/her up for.
-Original Message-
From: Lucas Albers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTE
Any ideas on how to go through the process of signing up for spam.
Someone stole one of my friends credit card's number, and signed up with
some porno sites with his real email address.
I wanted to sign up the thief to every spamming email list on the planet.
I think this same idea would be appli
Jamie Pratt scribbled on Thursday, September 16, 2004 6:27 AM:
> Hi, I've been looking at how to integrate SA 3 (or 2.64 if
> not possible
> for 3) with MS exchange and have been looking at this page:
>
> http://www.christopherlewis.com/ExchangeSpamAssassin.htm
>
> ... Seems doable, but now wond
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael Parker writes:
> On Thu, Sep 16, 2004 at 09:35:34AM -0700, Justin Mason wrote:
> >
> > I'm pretty sure there's a bugzilla bug open about this... I can't find it
> > though. Could you open a bug at http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/
> > to re
Dan Mahoney, System Admin said:
>
> By the way, the defaults are usually pretty decent (and get way better
> once the bayes magic starts working). Perhaps you should look at WHY ham
> is being caught, and be sure to teach your users how to properly whitelist
> their mail if there's a problem. Th
On Thu, Sep 16, 2004 at 09:35:34AM -0700, Justin Mason wrote:
>
>
> I'm pretty sure there's a bugzilla bug open about this... I can't find it
> though. Could you open a bug at http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/
> to request it?
>
Turns out it's easy enough to do, but it might be cool to add a
On Thu, 16 Sep 2004 10:59:56 -0500
Chris Thielen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Josh,
> On Wed, 2004-09-15 at 15:57 -0500, Josh Trutwin wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Every time I run rules_du_jour (latest version) I get a
> > warning/error message, but I cannot tell where it is. I changed
> > perl to/
On Thu, Sep 16, 2004 at 12:01:21PM -0400, Brian Keifer wrote:
[snip]
>
> I'd like to add a second value, specified by the user and stored in
> the same table as all of the other SA prefs. This would be a second,
> higher, score that I'd like to have inserted as a second header into
> each message
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm pretty sure there's a bugzilla bug open about this... I can't find it
though. Could you open a bug at http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/
to request it?
- --j.
Brian Keifer writes:
> I'm using SpamAssassin 3.0 RC5 to tag messages according to pe
Hi, list.
I'm using SpamAssassin 3.0 RC5 to tag messages according to per-user
preferences specified in an SQL database. Users have the ability to
modify their settings in the database via a web-based application
(Sam, part of the Horde project). One of the settings is
required_hits. If the mes
Hi Josh,
On Wed, 2004-09-15 at 15:57 -0500, Josh Trutwin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Every time I run rules_du_jour (latest version) I get a warning/error
> message, but I cannot tell where it is. I changed perl to
> /usr/bin/perl -w and this is what it displays:
>
> # /root/bin/rules_du_jour
> /root/bin/r
At 10:39 AM 9.16.2004 -0400, Ryan Moore wrote:
>Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
>> Guys,
>>
>> Given that some spammers like to just slam mail at everyone at an entire
>> domain, is there an option to "greylist" these addresses?
>>
>> For example, my father's wife peggy has the domain peggytagg
On Thu, 16 Sep 2004, David B Funk wrote:
On Wed, 15 Sep 2004, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
Guys,
Given that some spammers like to just slam mail at everyone at an entire
domain, is there an option to "greylist" these addresses?
For example, my father's wife peggy has the domain peggytaggart.com
Quoting Chris Santerre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Greetings Spamfighters.
This is the only time I'll mention this. I , yes I, requested a paypal
donate button for SARE. I put it up on the homepage of SARE. I wanted this
just because our host has been very good to us, and put up with quite a lot
of traffi
On Thu, Sep 16, 2004 at 05:08:23PM +0200, Trevor Dodds wrote:
> All outbound email flow through this server aswell. So I need all
> internal mail servers to be
> skiped.
You need to talk to the mimedefang guys and ask how you do that. It has
nothing to do with SpamAssassin itself.
--
Randomly
Hi,
I've installed
Sendmail 8.13.1 / MIMEdefang 2.44 / Spamassassin 2.64 - This is a relay
server.
I've added
trusted_networks 172.16/16 to the sa-mimedefang.cf but this
doesn't help.
All outbound
email flow
through this server aswell. So I need all internal mail servers to
On Thu, 16 Sep 2004, Stewart Nelson wrote:
Turn this around and make a rule for it. I have one and it works great.
FROM_ME_TO_ME.
The description says, "Why the hell would I get email from myself, from
outside!"
Well, I often send myself email, usually to store some (important to me
but not sensiti
On Thu, 16 Sep 2004, Ryan Moore wrote:
Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
Guys,
Given that some spammers like to just slam mail at everyone at an entire
domain, is there an option to "greylist" these addresses?
For example, my father's wife peggy has the domain peggytaggart.com, she
ONLY gives out
Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
Guys,
Given that some spammers like to just slam mail at everyone at an entire
domain, is there an option to "greylist" these addresses?
For example, my father's wife peggy has the domain peggytaggart.com, she
ONLY gives out the peggy@ email address for this.
Fo
On Thu, Sep 16, 2004 at 09:36:53AM -0400, Chris Santerre wrote:
> Does anyone else seriously think that donating to a open source project
> should be a tax write off? Or am I the only one??? Would a project have to
You know, if you donate to the Apache Software Foundation (see
http://apache.org/fo
At 03:43 AM 8/21/2004, Xavier wrote:
relay1 & relay2 have booth a SpamAssassing running.
Problem: when a mail is received on relay2, it's being check by SA
and tagged as spam. Later, relay2 sent it to relay1.
relay1 don't mark it as spam???
How to re-use the tags added by relay2?
How do you call SA
Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
[...] Here's an example to show what I mean.
From: Ackermanmloz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Did you whitelist mail from or to the prime.gushi.org domain, or to danm?
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on prime.gushi.org
X-Spam-Sta
BTW, if you open source project happened to have an NPO license from the
state for which it holds a license to conduct business (yes, I know it's
an oxymoron) which isn't hard to get then yes, donations would be a tax
write off...
Gary
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Santerre [mailto:[
Greetings Spamfighters.
This is the only time I'll mention this. I , yes I, requested a paypal
donate button for SARE. I put it up on the homepage of SARE. I wanted this
just because our host has been very good to us, and put up with quite a lot
of traffic :) They Never asked for anything. Not eve
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2004 4:10 AM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Subject line
>
>
> Dave Goodrich wrote:
> > I was non committal on the whole subject when this started.
> I tend to
>
Hi, I've been looking at how to integrate SA 3 (or 2.64 if not possible
for 3) with MS exchange and have been looking at this page:
http://www.christopherlewis.com/ExchangeSpamAssassin.htm
... Seems doable, but now wondering if anyone out here has any
experience or feedback on the implementation
Dave Goodrich wrote:
> I was non committal on the whole subject when this started. I tend to
> disagree with militant list nazis regardless of the topic or the view
> they put forth.
This is the second time in this thread that Nazis have been mentioned.
I hereby invoke Godwin's Law and declare t
From: "Roger Taranto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Wed, 2004-09-15 at 09:14, Chris Santerre wrote:
>
> > So for anyone who knows what I'm talking about on this page, feel free
to
> > spam it to all your friends and family! ;)
>
>
> You *must* check out the t-shirts here:
> http://www.thinkgeek.com/tsh
On Wed, 15 Sep 2004, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
> Guys,
>
> Given that some spammers like to just slam mail at everyone at an entire
> domain, is there an option to "greylist" these addresses?
>
> For example, my father's wife peggy has the domain peggytaggart.com, she
> ONLY gives out the p
Roger Taranto wrote:
You *must* check out the t-shirts here:
http://www.thinkgeek.com/tshirts/frustrations/
Especially this one: http://www.thinkgeek.com/tshirts/frustrations/388b/
I wear that one whenever I go visit my father, wear it just for him ;]
And, this one is a personal favorite:
http:
On Wed, 2004-09-15 at 09:14, Chris Santerre wrote:
So for anyone who knows what I'm talking about on this page, feel free to
spam it to all your friends and family! ;)
You *must* check out the t-shirts here: http://www.thinkgeek.com/tshirts/frustrations/
Especially this one: http://www.thin
Hello Tobin,
Wednesday, September 15, 2004, 7:24:42 AM, you wrote:
T> Thanks for your response. I tried whitelisting the spoofed address. And
T> then yes the IP which I know is porposterous but Im desparate. Then I
T> whitelisted the SMTP DNS name which is also wrong. Im lost as to what I
T> shou
Turn this around and make a rule for it. I have one and it works great.
FROM_ME_TO_ME.
The description says, "Why the hell would I get email from myself, from
outside!"
Well, I often send myself email, usually to store some (important to me
but not sensitive) information so it can be accessed from
On Wed, 15 Sep 2004, Kelson wrote:
Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
Yes, I know this. I actually wrote something to create a RBL based on
virus senders. I'd just like to be able to drop (or maybe teergrube) the
connection in the BEGINNING instead of after the hangup.
Look into the sendmail conf
Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
Yes, I know this. I actually wrote something to create a RBL based on
virus senders. I'd just like to be able to drop (or maybe teergrube)
the connection in the BEGINNING instead of after the hangup.
Look into the sendmail config option BAD_RCPT_THROTTLE. The v
46 matches
Mail list logo
