Hello,
May I ask if I could do a range query for an array type column?
For number type column, the following range query works in Solr:
product_id:[ 1 TO 100]
For string type column, the following range query works as well:
product_name: [ * TO "Television"]
If a column, say “category” has been
Hello,
I am learning Solr.
In "The Standard Query Parser", I find:
Range queries are not limited to date fields or even numerical fields, but
also use with non-date fields (e.g. title:{Aida TO Carmen})
I tried a range query in a Solr database (8.3)
staffName_txt:[ "Gross Bob" TO "Lindmar Deborah"]
aracter case" (uppercase/lowercase) in your
> indexed data vs your search query. For example, I would expect something
> like staffName_txt:[ "Gross Bob" TO "lindmar Deborah"] to return "Mr
> Kenyon John" as M indeed does lie between G and l.
>
>
for example "Mr Kenyon John" would
> generate 3 tokens: "Mr", "Kenyon" and "John".
>
> If you performed your range query on this field, it would check each token
> separately to see if it was in the specified range. If any token was, the
> do
> > modifying the text_general fieldType, and explicitly map the
> staffName_txt
> > field to it. Otherwise you will change how searching works for all fields
> > that use this the text_general fieldType (you would no longer be able to
> > retrieve documents by searching for
Hello,
I am trying to create a field type in managed-schema (Solr 8.11).
The data post to solr is:
{
"add-field-type": {
"name": "myNewTxtField",
"class": "solr.TextField",
"analyzer": {
"type": "query",
"tokenizer": {
"class": "so
Hello,
I did a query based on one collection and want to insert its result into
another collection of the same Solr. The query result has the same fields
as that of another collection. Is there a simple way to do the job?
If the query result has to be moved outside Solr before being added to
anothe
e.org/guide/8_4/stream-decorator-reference.html
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Mar 23, 2022, at 4:06 AM, WU, Zhiqing wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> > I did a query based on one collection and want to insert its result into
> > another collection of the same Sol
Hello,
I do not know why Nested Facets (
https://solr.apache.org/guide/8_11/json-facet-api.html#nested-facets) does
not work for _txt_sort field (SortableTextField).
To reproduce the problem,
I created a new collection (Config set: _default) and add the following to
the collection
{
"name_txt_
":"Olivia Wilson",
"count":1}]}}}
Should I try "method":"uif" at another place?
Kind regards,
Zhiqing
On Mon, 25 Apr 2022 at 17:47, Michael Gibney
wrote:
> This is related to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13056
>
>
recommendation is: don't use SortableTextField for faceting.
> Would it work to use TextField instead? TextField has to be uninverted, but
> at least it meets the requirement of indexed values being compatible with
> values over which bulk facet collection takes place.
>
> O
Hello,
What is wrong with my following query?
I have a Solr query:
{
"query": X,
"sort":"prodAllGeneric_txt_sort asc"
}
(Note: prodAllGeneric_txt_sort is a field, X is the details of a query)
If X is "(prodAllGeneric_txt_sort:\"Phi; \")", Solr finds 3 documents
If X is "(-prodAllGeneric_txt_s
Thank Shawn and Tim,
The following line addresses my issue.
> prodAllGeneric_txt_sort:"Phi; " OR (*:* -prodAllGeneric_txt_sort:[* TO *])
Besides, your explanation is very helpful.
Kind regards,
Zhiqing
On Tue, 17 May 2022 at 02:45, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 5/16/2022 2:32 PM, W
other more narrow solution?), I think the
> only
> > > responsible recommendation is: don't use SortableTextField for
> faceting.
> > > Would it work to use TextField instead? TextField has to be uninverted,
> > but
> > > at least it meets the req
Hello,
We are going to change the class of key fields in our Solr. We hope these
fields are sortable and can be used for grouping and searching.
We have considered solr.StrField, TextField and SortableTextField. However,
we notice that StrField is not case-insensitive, which is not good for
searchi
e indexed in different
> fields with different analyses. If you do it with copyField, you don't even
> have to worry about it at index time.
>
> Thomas
>
> Op di 17 mei 2022 om 22:21 schreef WU, Zhiqing :
>
> > Hello,
> > We are going to change the class of k
Hello,
I use two methods to get the information of groups, one is Result Grouping
and the other is Terms Facet.
Result grouping:
q=*:*&group=true&group.field=repPatSurname_s&rows=100
Terms Facet
{
"query": "*:*",
"limit":0,
"facet": {
"categories" : {
"type": "terms",
"field"
Yes, the "missing" parameter is what I was looking for.
Many thanks,
Zhiqing
On Tue, 24 May 2022 at 21:28, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 5/24/22 13:48, WU, Zhiqing wrote:
> > Is there any setting in Facet API I could change to get the 'field =
> null'
> &g
Hello,
I tried to get numBuckets of a facet but "numBuckets" shown in the Solr
response is wrong.
My query to Solr (8.11):
{
"query": "caseRef_txt_sort:*009*",
"limit": 0,
"fields": ["caseno_s"],
"facet": {
"categories": {
"field": "caseno_s",
"offset": 0,
"limit": -1
19 matches
Mail list logo
