We encountered the same bug in SolrCloud deployment on our staging environment.
We run Solr in Kubernetes and we use the official solr:9.0.0 docker image.
If this is a know bug in JDK that especially affects Lucene projects (and by
proxy, Solr) why does the official Solr image use Java 17?
Toma
Hi,
quick question about nightly images - I see that some images, like
9.1.0-SNAPSHOT [1], were pushed long time ago (25 days) yet branch 9_1_0 on
GitHub shows there were many changes since then [2] (latest 14h ago). I'll
admit, I don't understand much about how nightly images are actually buil
Hi,
I'm trying trying to set up a single node Solr cloud cluster in docker-compose
and create a collection on startup.
Even though I'm using Solr 8.11.2, I'm following "Solr in Docker" instructions
from Solr 9.1 reference guide.
(I believe that's fine and there are not many changes between 8 a
ompose.yml>
> and
> https://github.com/querqy/chorus/blob/main/quickstart.sh
> <https://github.com/querqy/chorus/blob/main/quickstart.sh>
>
>
>
>> On Feb 5, 2023, at 10:47 AM, Tomasz Elendt wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm trying trying to s
and generally fix those issues.
>
> If you dig into create_collection, please do tag me on any PR’s and I’d love
> to work with you to get it fixed.
>
>> On Feb 5, 2023, at 11:09 AM, Tomasz Elendt wrote:
>>
>> Yes, but there you run a separate 3 node Zookeeper cl
Hey, I tried to find how to escape the separator character in term values used
in Terms Query Parser but I could find it.
I check the documentation but it's not there:
https://solr.apache.org/guide/solr/latest/query-guide/other-parsers.html#terms-query-parser
Next, I tried to escape it with "\",
Cheers,
Tomasz
> On 22. Mar 2023, at 19:53, Mikhail Khludnev wrote:
>
> I think it was made so for sake of simplicity. That's why it has separator
> param. Query generator should just choose the right one absent
> across terms.
>
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 7:37 PM Tomasz
Hey,
If I want to rerank (rq={!ltr ...}) the window of top-k results but that top-k
is not selected by a regular query-to-doc similarity score, but by a value of a
date field (so technically, rerank k most recent), how should I do it?
Is ?q={!func}ms(my_date_field) the only way?
Or is there a