Unexpected results while performing a full text search with an asterisk

2021-08-12 Thread Netta STEINBERG
results The only difference between the searches is the added asterisk. Anyone has an idea for why this may happen? why a search with an asterisk yields less results than a search without the asterisk? Thanks, Netta Steinberg

Re: Unexpected results while performing a full text search with an asterisk

2021-08-15 Thread Netta Steinberg
Thanks Stephen, I didn't know that there is no language analysis when using an asterisk. There are two things (somewhat related) that bother me: 1. as far as I know, the query parameter we send to SolR contains only the query string, without a specific field to search for, so I'm not sure which

Results appear to be wrongly ordered after sorting

2022-09-07 Thread Netta Steinberg
Hello all, I have 3 indexed items. Each item has a field named TITLE_Name_t. The TITLE_ Name_t value has the same prefix for all three items, but a different suffix. The values are: THE PROMISE YR. 2 (SVOD)_PX217330-M THE PROMISE YR. 2 (SVOD)_PX218328-M THE PROMISE YR. 2 (SVOD)_PX217328-M So the

Re: Results appear to be wrongly ordered after sorting

2022-09-08 Thread Netta Steinberg
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/ Thank you, I'll try to use string or SortableTextField, but I still don't understand why sorting on a tokenized field doesn't work as expected when all the tokens are the same except for one. Why Solr doesn't sort by this term? Netta Steinberg

Is there a way to sort alphanumerically?

2022-11-10 Thread Netta Steinberg
Hi all, I want to sort value alphabetically, but also numerically. Example: I want that the following items A1 B4 A2 A19 B10 Will be sorted in the following order A1 A2 A19 B2 B19 So values that start with A will appear before values that start with B, but also A2 will appear before A19, becaus

RE: Re: Is there a way to sort alphanumerically?

2022-11-10 Thread Netta Steinberg
It seems to provide exactly the functionality I needed, thanks! On 2022/11/10 10:08:51 Andrew Hankinson wrote: > I use this field definition for a sort field: > > numeric="true" strength="secondary" alternate="shifted" > sortMissingLast="true" /> > > This seems to work well. > > -Andrew >