Re: Solr: Get leaderness status of local node

I'm not familiar with the way update processors work but an update is processed by the leader after having been routed to it, right? Would it be possible to run the leader specific code there/then while taking advantage of knowing execution happens on the leader? Ilan Le ven. 7 mai 2021 à 21:20,

Re: Unsubscribe, please

Could it be because the "from" address in your email has an ".invalid" suffix? Ilan On Sat 8 Jan 2022 at 09:23, Nicolas Bouillon wrote: > Hi All > > It’s all very nice to keep answering that but I already tried 100 times > and tried also to request to remove me. > And….I’m still there, not remo

Re: Inconsistent replica placement with nodeType affinity

Thanks a lot Ixai for the debugging work and PR (that looks good to me - I'll merge it shortly). As I understand you managed to make this work end to end, can you please confirm that the per node system property to use (to match the " collectionNodeType" config) is indeed node_type? Thanks, Ilan

Re: Add a new Shard to the collection

Well, if the size of the two shards you now have is equivalent, you will not be able to get to 3 balanced (in size) shards. If one of the two seems to get more data (is larger), split that one. This might be the case if you use fancy routing for deciding which doc goes where. Otherwise, to get to

Re: Add a new Shard to the collection

Please let me know if any other information is required. > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 11:29 PM Ilan Ginzburg wrote: > > > Well, if the size of the two shards you now have is equivalent, you will > > not be able to get to 3 balanced (in size) shards. > > > >

Re: PlacementPlugin to restrict two different shards of the same collection on the same node

Indeed I don't think there is any restriction on placing replicas of different shards of a collection on the same node (no access to the code right now to check). If all nodes are empty before placement, all have enough free disk space, total number of replicas (number of shards times replication

Re: Node roles vs SIP-20 Separation of Compute and Storage

HI, Thanks for asking that question. The separation of compute and storage would be relevant for the nodes having the "data" role, i.e. nodes that host indexes. SIP-20 offers a way for these indexes to be on shared storage (S3/GCS etc) and not persisted long term on each individual node, making t

Re: Node roles vs SIP-20 Separation of Compute and Storage

17, 2024 at 5:26 AM Ilan Ginzburg wrote: > > > HI, > > Thanks for asking that question. > > > > The separation of compute and storage would be relevant for the nodes > > having the "data" role, i.e. nodes that host indexes. > > > > SIP-20 off

Re: Seeing "Negative" Overseer ID

Didn’t look at the code but from the number of digits wouldn’t it be a long wrapping around into negative territory? On Tue 3 Dec 2024 at 02:55, Patrick Lok wrote: > Hi, > > We are seeing some weird issues with the Overseer ID which causes some > overseer election problems in our cluster. > > Re

Re: Seeing "Negative" Overseer ID

gt; there's a way to reset it. > > On Tue, Dec 3, 2024 at 3:28 AM Ilan Ginzburg wrote: > > > Didn’t look at the code but from the number of digits wouldn’t it be a long > > wrapping around into negative territory? > > > > On Tue 3 Dec 2024 at 02:55, Patrick Lok