Can you please tell me about the hardware details (Server type, CPU speed
and type, Disk Speed and type) and GC configuration? Also please post
results of top, iotop if you can?
Deepak
"The greatness of a nation can be judged by the way its animals are treated
- Mahatma Gandhi"
+91 73500 12833
d
Are you having iowait, gc pauses, or something else? Do you commit often or in
one big batch?
> On Jun 20, 2024, at 12:26 AM, Saksham Gupta
> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> We have been facing extra load incidents due to higher gc count and gc time
> causing higher response time and timeouts.
>
>
Hi All.
I am facing a weird issue while upgrading Solr8.11 to Solr9.
I have everyhting up and running passing all kind of tests unit and
integration on my current CD process.
I have a cluster of 3 machines on SolrCloud and it's all good and working.
Problem happens when machines are restarted. Ei
Hi,
I'm using a traditional master/replica Solr (8.11) setup and I'm trying to tune
Solr's autoCommitTimeout, autoSoftCommitTimeout on the Solr master and the
pollInterval on the replicas to achieve an overall better indexing throughput
while still maintaining an acceptably low indexing latency
Hi all,
the latest mole in the eternal whack-a-mole game with web crawlers
(GPTBot) DoS'ed our Solr again & I took a closer look at the logs.
Here's what it looks like is happening:
- the bot is hitting a URL backed by Solr search and starts following
all permutations of facets and "next pag
solr allows you to go into page=1000 or whatever, bots will follow it,
but there is rarely any business value for going so deep.
You can come up with a scheme for cursormarks + caching (faster than
paging) or just stop showing results past page 5-10.
On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 11:39 AM Dmitri Maziuk
I Work in a library so yes we have a similar Problem our solr ist used inderect
by a Webapplikationen running in another Server
WE use https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/fail2ban to Block IPs which exceed a
given number of requests per Minute
Von: Dmitri Maziuk
Ge
+1 for fail2ban
@Dmitri Maziuk if your Solr is behind Apache httpd then you may be
interested in mod-evasive which worked well for XMLRPC attacks against
Wordpress.
You can combo it with fail2ban
https://ejectdisc.org/2015/08/08/admin-a-wordpress-site-running-on-debian-linux-learn-how-to-protect
On 6/20/24 11:17, Imran Chaudhry wrote:
...
If I were running on linux I'd have them blocked at iptbales-recent
too... and if I were running on bare metal I'd put it on an SSD-cached
ZVOL and likely not see Java choke on nio under load. But I am not. :(
It sounds like your Solr is publically
I've been unable to reproduce anything like this behavior. If you're
really getting queryResultCache hits for these, then the field
type/etc of the field you're querying on shouldn't make a difference.
type/etc of the return field (product_id) would be more likely to
matter. I wonder what would hap
For some historic reasons, Solr has always explicitly overridden the
`clientPortAddress` -- but as of a few versions ago, there is a Solr
setting (SOLR_ZK_EMBEDDED_HOST) that can be used to override solr's
override...
https://solr.apache.org/guide/solr/latest/deployment-guide/taking-solr-to-p
FYI: There is a solution in the last paragraph, but I still ran your
tests, since the solution was found by "Cut and Try" and there is no
deep understanding.
>I wonder what would happen if you fully bypassed the query cache (i.e.,
>`q={!cache=false}product_type:"1"`?
It does not help, there is n
12 matches
Mail list logo
