Re: [dev help wanted] admin UI: make commandline args sorting optional

2024-02-06 Thread Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON)
Hello, Thank you very much for this question about workflow! https://github.com/apache/solr/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md or https://solr.apache.org/community.html#how-to-contribute would be two ways to learn more. And I'd like to also specifically mention that you can contribute to code without

Re: [dev help wanted] admin UI: make commandline args sorting optional

2024-02-06 Thread ufuk yılmaz
Thank you Christine!! — > On 6 Feb 2024, at 16:47, Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON) > wrote: > > Hello, > > Thank you very much for this question about workflow! > > https://github.com/apache/solr/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md or > https://solr.apache.org/community.html#how-to-contribute

Re: Block MAX WAND feature use

2024-02-06 Thread rajani m
> With a 400M index it's worth experimenting with skipping about a million of docs. Is there a param that allows setting how many docs to skip? "minExactCount '' which decides how many docs it should care to score and I tested that with 100, 1000 and 2000 with latency only increased. Alessandro

Does documentCache still make sense in modern Solr?

2024-02-06 Thread Chris Hostetter
TL;DR: Some limited testing suggests that documentCache adds overhead w/o benefit. Are there any folks that can can report their usecases perform significantly better with documentCache enabled? Background... I was asked to investigate a Solr 9.1 kubernetes deployment where a subset of t

Group by query reports null pointer when unique key is not stored

2024-02-06 Thread rajani m
Hi Solr Users, Group by query is failing with the following error message. It looks like TopGroupsResultTransformer.java

Re: Group by query reports null pointer when unique key is not stored

2024-02-06 Thread uyil...@vivaldi.net.INVALID
I also got this exception before and in order to avoid reindexing TB's of data, had to resort to grouping via streaming expressions, which has its ups and downs. If it's technically infeasible to substitute docValues for this purpose (when useDocValuesAsStored:true), it would be nice if it was d