Here's the Lucene change
https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/10247
It will be interesting to experiment with old logic of deeply nesting
spans, but with intervals.
On Mon, Nov 6, 2023 at 11:00 PM Karun G wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Trying to upgrade from solr 8.9.0 to 9.2 and got the issue as below.
Hello Jan,
Thanks for the article and suggestions.
On Fri, Nov 3, 2023 at 2:11 PM Jan Høydahl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What's going on is Lucene doing merges of segments, and when it so does,
> all documents marked for deletion in the old segments are gone, freeing up
> space. I recommend planning for
Hey, thanks for sharing.
Each version of the operator supports a range of Solr versions. The latest
operator version (0.8.0) only supports Solr versions >= 8.11. It looks
like the tutorial you were following along with hasn't been updated to
match the range of Solr versions, which is definitely
Mikhail, Thanks for the comment. Is this considered a bug or as a new
feature with no plan to address this type of query expansion in further
releases?
thanks.
On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 3:00 AM Mikhail Khludnev wrote:
> Here's the Lucene change
> https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/10247
> It
It's a feature. No plan to address, beside my earlier idea to prototype
expansion to intervals, but I couldn't find anyone who's interested in
evaluation, and suspended prototyping. So, it's worth revising the problem
definition and approach.
On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 5:40 PM Karun G wrote:
> Mikha
Hey,
If I want to rerank (rq={!ltr ...}) the window of top-k results but that top-k
is not selected by a regular query-to-doc similarity score, but by a value of a
date field (so technically, rerank k most recent), how should I do it?
Is ?q={!func}ms(my_date_field) the only way?
Or is there a
Just got to give this a try and it worked GREAT!Here is the working example
(that will be in the upcoming “How to use Vectors” tutorial):
let(
a=select(
search(films,
qt="/select",
q="name:"Finding Nemo" OR name:"Bee Movie" OR name:"Harry Potter and
the Chamber of S
Mikhail, thanks for the clarification. Many regards..
On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 10:04 AM Mikhail Khludnev wrote:
> It's a feature. No plan to address, beside my earlier idea to prototype
> expansion to intervals, but I couldn't find anyone who's interested in
> evaluation, and suspended prototyping
: Mikhail, Thanks for the comment. Is this considered a bug or as a new
: feature with no plan to address this type of query expansion in further
: releases?
It is a documented feature in Lucene (to prevent query explosion) with the
change in behavior called out in the "Major Changes" section o
Hoss, Thanks for the update. Any idea how to handle this exact query (which
was giving no results before upgrade and now gives error and pushes query
to a big loop for maxBooleanClauses issue ) , Many regards.
http://localhost:8983/solr/techproducts/select?start=0&rows=0&defType=edismax&pf=title
10 matches
Mail list logo
