On 10/20/2023 5:23 PM, David Filip wrote:
From a matter of perspective, however, I think what I am not clear on is
having more than one ZK “server”, and when and why I would need more than one?
Perhaps it is just terminology, but if I have three (3x) Solr instances (cores)
running on three (3
Oops, here we go:
https://imgur.com/a/jSVKgkZ
On Monday, 23/10/2023 at 02:24 Ishan Chattopadhyaya wrote:
Unfortunately, the mailing list doesn't allow images to be attached. I
think it is time to retire this mailing list, move to a modern
discussion
forum. Thankfully, some community members ar
Probably not very helpful for the original question, but for the sake of
completeness: you can use the Lucene documentID with the Luke Request
Handler.
https://solr.apache.org/guide/solr/latest/indexing-guide/luke-request-handler.html
You can not use it as a reliable identifier for your Solr docu
I'm looking to delete a big set of documents, based on a list of ids I have.
Testing this in a test environment has caused the VM to be unresponsive for
several minutes, which isn't ideal.
Are there options to paginate a delete query?
Also, are there options to ask solr about a specific query it
Hi Koen,
You'll have to implement that on the client side.
If you happen to use PHP, the Solarium PHP client has a plugin that does
just that:
https://solarium.readthedocs.io/en/stable/plugins/#buffereddelete-plugin
(Full disclosure: I wrote the plugin.)
Thomas
Op ma 23 okt 2023 om 10:47 schre
We are using Solr 8.9.0. We have configured Solr cloud like 2 shards and each
shard has one replica. We have used 5 zoo keepers for Solr cloud.
We have created collection name documents and index size of one shard is 21GB.
Schema fields like here
We want to search data which cont
> On 22 Oct 2023, at 22:28, rajani m wrote:
>
> Hi Andrea,
>
> Good to hear that.
Would be nice to understand why it’s happening however… :)
> What type of *cache* config do you have in the old
> configuration? I ask because Legacy Solr Cache from 8.x does not work when
> solr is upgraded
> On 22 Oct 2023, at 23:31, Shawn Heisey wrote:
>
> On 10/21/2023 2:31 AM, Ing. Andrea Vettori wrote:
>> Hello, we’re using two SOLR servers (same hw, same version of solr and java,
>> same solr config). The SOLR version is 9.3 and JVM is Adoptium JDK 17.0.8.1
>> on Linux.
>> They both were ru
Hello Thomas,
Thanks for the reply. Using nodejs here, but thanks for the information, it
does help.
Kind regards,
Koen
On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 11:22 AM Thomas Corthals
wrote:
> Hi Koen,
>
> You'll have to implement that on the client side.
>
> If you happen to use PHP, the Solarium PHP client
Thanks Shawn!
I have since created 3x physical servers (Virtual Machines running on a cloud
server), each one running its own instance of both ZooKeeper and Solr, and
every Zookeeper/Solr instance configured to know about the others. Everything
seems to be working as expected, and any configur
On 10/23/2023 8:18 AM, David Filip wrote:
In theory I guess I could bind Solr only to the Ethernet network (it currently
binds to 0.0.0.0, a.k.a. all network interfaces), but then I would need to set
up a separate proxy from my WiFi network to each of the Solr servers, which I
would rather not
Hello,
Not sure if this is group to ask but we are potentially looking for a solr
expert to examine our solr instance to help provide action items to optimize
performance.
Thanks,
Pino Alu | HCL Commerce Administrator :: Emerson.com | Enterprise IT
Emerson | 8000 West Florissant Ave. | St. Lou
Hello Pino, there is a list [1] of companies offering support.
Regards,
Markus
[1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SOLR/Support
Op ma 23 okt 2023 om 17:15 schreef Alu, Pino [EMR/ENT/IT/STL] <
pino@emerson.com>:
> Hello,
>
>
>
> Not sure if this is group to ask but we are potenti
Hi!
I tested this, and it seems the problem is related to Solr cloud mode.
It works perfectly in a non-cloud setup. Here is the debug response:
{
"responseHeader":{
"status":0,
"QTime":2,
"params":{
"q":"{!knn f=TESTEMBEDDING_EU_3 topK=3}[1.0,1.0,1.0]",
"defType":"lu
I’ve defined TruncateFieldUpdateProcessorFactor in our update request processor
chain, targeted at solr.StrField, but it isn’t truncating the content. That
field is populated by a copyField directive. Is the copyField evaluated after
the update chain? Could that cause this to not work?
wunder
W
Hi. We have a solr index with around 2.5M documents , running solr 8.11 .
We have bunch of fields that we faceet/sort/highlight on. Heap is 8GB, out
of 12 GB RAM
These fields were not defined with docValues=true due to some legacy design
issues , but if we were to rewrite the app, we would definit
Thanks Jamie. I've upgraded some of these in branch_8_11. I didn't have a
Hadoop cluster handy, so wasn't able to upgrade the Hadoop dependency,
though.
My naive attempt to just increase the Hadoop library version resulted in
several failed tests that I wasn't able to debug.
On Tue, 3 Oct 2023 at
Thanks for the reply, Ishan. Once these make it into a docker image, I'll
rescan.
On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 3:23 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks Jamie. I've upgraded some of these in branch_8_11. I didn't have a
> Hadoop cluster handy, so wasn't able to upgrade
If you want to "delete by query" but you don't care about the atomicity of
the "delete by query" (ie: queries and or other updates may process in the
middle of the delete) then that is exactly what the delete() streaming
expression decorator was designed for...
https://solr.apache.org/guide/s
Hello Walter.
I'm afraid the copyField directive is handled quite after update
processor chain.
May you try with CloneFieldUpdateProcessorFactory before truncating?
On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 8:29 PM Walter Underwood
wrote:
> I’ve defined TruncateFieldUpdateProcessorFactor in our update request
>
20 matches
Mail list logo
