Hi,
We are using SOLR 8.11.2 both classic and containerised/docker.
We have an internal security scanner and it contains multiple types of scans.
On the latest scans we have:
Critical
CVE-2015-1832 : org.apache.derby:derby 10.9.1.0
: org.apache.derby:derby 10.9.1.0
Critical
CVE-
Okay. Thanks for the response.
On Wed, 8 Feb 2023 at 16:23, Mikhail Khludnev wrote:
> Hello, Grace.
> Now, MoreLikeThis handler carries the burden of invoking FacetComponet's
> internals, but it does nothing for highlighting, and there is no way to
> plug HighlightingComponent in it via solrcon
Hi Grace,
I'd like to reiterate what Mikhail said but emphasize on using the
MLTQParser. Issues like this is why the MLT query parser was added (
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6248 )
On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 1:22 PM Mikhail Khludnev wrote:
> Hello, Grace.
> Now, MoreLikeThis handler
Hi Razvan,
We maintain a forked branch of Solr 8.11.2 that fixes , I think, all of
these. We also publish a container for that. If you're interested to
learn more, let me know.
Best,
-Kevin
https://kmwllc.com
On Thu, Feb 9, 2023 at 7:37 AM Razvan Bolocan
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
Hello!
I'm doing something wrong when configuring the suggester,
it didn't work for me with 9 and now also with Solr 8.11.2:
{
"servlet":"default",
"message":"Not Found",
"url":"/solr/core01/suggest",
"status":"404"
}
This is my fresh solrconfig.xml file:
https://paste.debian.net/1270165/
I did
Is this known behavior or is it worth a JIRA ticket?
Searching against a text_general field in Solr 9.1, if my edismax query is
"foo bar" I should be able to get matches for "foo" without "bar" and vice
versa. However, if there happens to be a synonym rule applied at query
time, like "foo bar,zzz"
Hi Mikhail,
Thank a lot for your answer, this means we will only pay a small heap price
for both docValues and indexed, right? Thx for your `rawSize=true` finding,
this will be helpful to inspect disk usage.
Best,
Heinz
Am Di., 7. Feb. 2023 um 21:21 Uhr schrieb Mikhail Khludnev :
> Hello, Heinz
Thank you all
Mikhail Khludnev schrieb am Mi., 8. Feb. 2023, 19:47:
> I suppose if we sort=_docid_ asc it will break after collecting rows rows.
> Obviously, it disables all scoring, but perhaps you can pre-sort index.
>
> On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 7:36 PM Tomás Fernández Löbbe <
> tomasflo...@gm
Pls check inside below.
On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 9:21 AM Heinz Hölzer
wrote:
> Hi Mikhail,
>
> Thank a lot for your answer, this means we will only pay a small heap price
> for both docValues and indexed, right?
Exactly. Perhaps this idea expressed
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T5RmMNDR5XI
Som
