Shawn - thanks for your response !
1M index was just an example. For instance, we are planning to have multiple
customers on same SolrCloud cluster (each customer/tenant=collection) . Some
customers may have 1-2M docs (small ones),
some will have 3-12M docs (medium ones) and some will have 20-80
Hi Andy,
There is a solr search api which does not have either sorting or faceting
done with id field. But, after we execute the API, we do see id field entry
in field cache. I checked the solrconfig file too, we have not added any
id configuration that could have caused this.
Please help me cla
Hi Poorna,
I think it would be helpful if you backed up a bit and told us exactly what
version of solr you are using, exactly what api you are calling (examples
please). Finally please detail *how* you are looking at the field cache.
You also haven't told us much about where you are in the process
> On Jul 18, 2022, at 3:11 AM, Poorna Murali wrote:
>
> There is a solr search api which does not have either sorting or faceting
> done with id field. But, after we execute the API, we do see id field entry
> in field cache. I checked the solrconfig file too, we have not added any
> id confi
Hi all,
I found an error and stack trace occurred when I set a 'TextField' type
field to a 'group.field' parameter and got group facets.
According to the manual,we can set 'StrField' or 'TextField' type field to
'group.field' parameter.
(See
https://solr.apache.org/guide/solr/latest/query-guide/re
Hi Jason,
OK - that's good for me :-) Thanks!
So when do you plan to remove the support then? With version 9.1? Or rather
10.x?
Michael
On Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 5:39 PM Jason Gerlowski
wrote:
> Haha, a "happy accident" for sure! I never relish trimming
> functionality; it's necessary to keep t
