Is there any way in the query so that I do not need to reindex the whole data?
On 2021/10/23 15:39:18, Walter Underwood wrote:
> Agreed. There is a simple fix. Index all the words. Also, stop using
> EdgeNgramFilter.
> That is only used for completion, not word search.
>
> wunder
> Walter Unde
You can pre process the query to remove anything not indexed (less than 3
characters) but that initial scheme decision was a mistake, and should be
remedied and reindexed.
> On Oct 25, 2021, at 8:36 AM, son hoang wrote:
>
> Is there any way in the query so that I do not need to reindex the w
I would think your problem goes beyond 1 and 2 characters words not being
indexed.
With your current field type definition, if someone searches for "can" it
will retrieve documents that contain any word that start with "can". So
"candidate", canadian", "cantina", etc.
Is this really the desired s
Hi SOLR Community,
I'm experimenting with solr 8.10 and trying to get a query pattern with
child docs to work. An example of a nested document structure I'd like to
search is below. In this example, there will only be two levels, child of
type:post and /comments children.
{
"id": "post1",
I think I found it!
I didn't realise, but we have boost files for the core I'm testing and the
boost is applied after replication! Setting the contents of the files to
empty completely removes the post-replication performance problem we were
seeing.
So now my question becomes "Why is boosting tak
Performance with the replica pulling from 8.3.1 was actually worse. And
looking at the data in the databases and the boost file contents, I'm
dubious it's a problem of incompatible boost files. I think the performance
of importing/applying the boosts really is what's responsible for the issue
we se
Hi there,
I’m, new in solr so let me know in case I’m missing anything here.
I’m following this guide but no luck so far -
https://solr.apache.org/guide/8_10/making-and-restoring-backups.html .
So, that I’ve did at the moment
In solr.xml I’ve added backup section
solr-ba
Hi there,
I’m, new in solr so let me know in case I’m missing anything here.
I’m following this guide but no luck so far -
https://solr.apache.org/guide/8_10/making-and-restoring-backups.html .
So, that I’ve did at the moment
In solr.xml I’ve added backup section
solr-backups
Hi Dominic,
Could you clarify what you mean by boost files in this context? Just
curious
Charlie
On 25/10/2021 17:11, Dominic Humphries wrote:
Performance with the replica pulling from 8.3.1 was actually worse. And
looking at the data in the databases and the boost file contents, I'm
dub
We have run across an issue where certain searches result in a vague
NPE. Any help into pointing into a correct direction would be appreciated.
### Example Log Entries:
2021-10-25 18:08:21.683 ERROR (qtp1659840424-39975) [c:alldata s:shard1
r:core_node64 x:alldata_shard1_replica_n63] o.a.s.h.R
Can you please share the complete exception stack trace from the log ?
- Rahul
On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 2:12 PM Michael Conrad wrote:
> We have run across an issue where certain searches result in a vague
> NPE. Any help into pointing into a correct direction would be appreciated.
>
> ### Exampl
I changed the global log level from WARN to INFO and still don't see a
stack trace.
2021-10-25 18:38:47.448 ERROR (qtp1659840424-40619) [c:alldata s:shard1
r:core_node64 x:alldata_shard1_replica_n63] o.a.s.h.RequestHandlerBase
java.lang.NullPointerException
2021-10-25 18:38:47.449 ERROR (qt
Trying to figure out why the xpath processor is only processing on entity when
there are multiple entities.
I have the following in my config file
There are multiple entities at the xpath="/TEI/text/body//placeName"
but only the last is stored and searchable?
thank
To me this (> performance sink) seems more like the job of a merge policy
which would take resources after documents are added to the index and
segments are reorganized based on custom / default policy.
On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 8:04 PM Charlie Hull <
ch...@opensourceconnections.com> wrote:
> Hi
14 matches
Mail list logo
