Hi Solr experts,
I am looking for a solution for this. We are using edismax query parser.
We have query like this:
q: (query1 OR query2 OR query3)
&bq:(bq1^2 bq2^3)
&bq:(bq3 bq4)
We wanted to add "tie breaker" only for bq1 and bq2 (Use Max instead of
sum).
How can we do that?
Thanks,
Manish.
Try using a dismax or edismax query for that bq.
On Mon, Oct 18, 2021, 06:22 Manish Bafna wrote:
> Hi Solr experts,
> I am looking for a solution for this. We are using edismax query parser.
> We have query like this:
> q: (query1 OR query2 OR query3)
> &bq:(bq1^2 bq2^3)
> &bq:(bq3 bq4)
>
> We w
I tried that and it is throwing error as: "Infinite Recursion detected
parsing query"
On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 4:09 PM Erik Hatcher wrote:
> Try using a dismax or edismax query for that bq.
>
> On Mon, Oct 18, 2021, 06:22 Manish Bafna
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Solr experts,
> > I am looking for a soluti
On Sun, Oct 17, 2021 at 12:41:44PM -0600, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 10/17/2021 7:08 AM, nskarthik wrote:
> >>> not possible when Solr is in standalone mode
> > I use Solr in NON-CLOUD standalone mode.
> >
> > Process : /solr Create -c
> > This feature just creates an empty core (copies all requi
Hello Solr Group,
Is there a general summary page of Solr best practices? And particularly
one for sizing Solr nodes, shards, and collections?
Thanks,
Ed
Apologies for not replying earlier, illness struck last week :(
So, I did some testing with increased Xss and Xmx values for 8.9.0 as
suggested.
Boosting Xss from 256k to 1024k made no impact on any tests.
Boosting from -Xmx7913m to -Xmx15826m did improve some things: solr was
less likely to bec
The Solr PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Solr 8.10.1.
Solr is the popular, blazing fast, open source NoSQL search platform from
the Apache Lucene project. Its major features include powerful full-text
search, hit highlighting, faceted search and analytics, rich document
parsing, g
Hi Tran,
I think you're specifying 'solr.allowPaths' in the right place, but
you probably need to remove the wildcard ('*') from the path you're
using. Most 'solr.allowPaths' usages I've seen (including the doc
example you mentioned) specify paths as absolute paths without a
trailing wildcard.
H
I’m trying to figure out why my warming is taking so long. It’s taking about
20-40 seconds on average. Can I measure where it’s spending its time?
I’ve got my firstSearcher and newSearcher set up like this:
...
world
popular_score desc, grou
What query did you try exactly?
> On Oct 18, 2021, at 6:54 AM, Manish Bafna wrote:
>
> I tried that and it is throwing error as: "Infinite Recursion detected
> parsing query"
>
> On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 4:09 PM Erik Hatcher wrote:
>
>> Try using a dismax or edismax query for that bq.
>>
>> O
One thing concerns me is the input of the test. Is the data/docs limited to
a particular number? There could be a possibility that all threads are
getting locked doing an update of a particular document (rather than
updating a large number of documents). This would create a bottleneck and
performan
The test is essentially a dump of requests made to our live service,
replayed on our test instances. They're purely read-only, so there should
be no contention in terms of writing updates - we update solr via a
completely separate mechanism.
On Mon, 18 Oct 2021 at 17:30, Deepak Goel wrote:
> One
On 10/18/21 9:07 AM, mtn search wrote:
Is there a general summary page of Solr best practices? And particularly
one for sizing Solr nodes, shards, and collections?
We do not have general advice for hardware sizing. There are many
things involved in coming up with a recommendation. And we o
This
(java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject@3b315cbb)
clearly indicates data contention. We just need to find out what.
Deepak
"The greatness of a nation can be judged by the way its animals are treated
- Mahatma Gandhi"
+91 73500 12833
deic...@gmail.com
Facebook
On 10/18/21 10:03 AM, Andy Lester wrote:
I’m trying to figure out why my warming is taking so long. It’s taking about
20-40 seconds on average. Can I measure where it’s spending its time?
I do not know of any way to figure out which little parts of a massive
query are the most time consumi
Thanks very much for this. This is a huge help.
> What I would recommend is that (at a time when query traffic is lowest) you
> turn off all warming, restart, and then do some manual queries where you
> check each fq and facet individually. Rebooting or clearing the OS disk
> cache before ea
On 10/18/21 12:53 PM, Andy Lester wrote:
What should we have in the newSearcher startup query, if the new searcher is
going to bring over the cached FQs from an existing searcher?
I know that filterCache handles autowarming for fq parameters. I do not
know whether queryResultCache stores any
> On Oct 18, 2021, at 2:38 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
>
>> What should we have in the newSearcher startup query, if the new searcher is
>> going to bring over the cached FQs from an existing searcher?
>
> I know that filterCache handles autowarming for fq parameters. I do not know
> whether qu
Hello,
I was reading the following SOLR reference (
https://solr.apache.org/guide/8_10/stream-source-reference.html#jdbc-syntax)
and was curious to try out the functionality, but unfortunately no matter
what I tried I would always receive the same error: *"EXCEPTION": "Failed
to load JDBC driver f
On 10/18/21 1:43 PM, Andy Lester wrote:
This sounds like you’re saying there is no value in having warming
queries in the newSearcher. Is that correct?
If my understanding is completely correct, then I have to concur with
that statement. It's better to rely on filterCache autowarming for fq,
On 10/18/21 1:10 PM, Mal Aware wrote:
I was reading the following SOLR reference (
https://solr.apache.org/guide/8_10/stream-source-reference.html#jdbc-syntax)
and was curious to try out the functionality, but unfortunately no matter
what I tried I would always receive the same error: *"EXCEPTION
Hello all,
I have been going mad trying to get SOLR to search for parentheses as literals.
For example, "(Figure 5)". I've tried entering it in the fq field as:
allText:\(Figure 5\)
(where allText is a facet). SOLR interprets this in the response as
"fq":"allText:\\(Figure 5\\)"
and it ends up
22 matches
Mail list logo