Re: Random Field - # digits

hi, > Random ≠ unique. Agree. They are not the same. I don't want a tie breaker, I want to know how many ties I would face. The implementation where it's being used has some other (posterior) sorting criteria. So the question can be rephrased as whether posterior orders have any effect or not.

Re: Random Field - # digits

You could use the UUIDUpdateProcessorFactory to automatically add a UUID to each document and use that as the tie-breaker field. https://solr.apache.org/guide/8_1/update-request-processors.html#uuidupdateprocessorfactory The chances of collision of UUIDs is well-known, and highly unlikely. http

Re: Random Field - # digits

Thanks. It's not what I need, but would have it mind. Sorry, my statement was not clear. I have already replied to Thomas with further details. thanks you all rodolfo On Tue, Aug 31, 2021, 9:08 AM Andrew Hankinson wrote: > You could use the UUIDUpdateProcessorFactory to automatically add a U

"The request took too long" cause exceptions in upgrade testing

I'm trying to upgrade from 8.3.1 to 8.8.1, and we're seeing slower performance and higher rate of failed requests when testing the upgrade. The main culprit seems to be when we're burdening the service enough to start causing "The request took too long to iterate over doc/point values" warnings. O

solr cloud vers 7.6.0 Requested node XXXXX:8090_solr is not part of the cluster

Hi, I have a large solr deployment with solr 7.6.0 128 servers 5 zookeepers on separate systems each solr host runs 2 solr instances one a primary shard one a secondary shard port 8080 is always primary aka master replica port 8090 is always a secondary replica These are all NRT replicas so to

Having problem with implicit field "_root_"

We have a solr setup from a very old version (1.4) and we are upgrading it to 8.9. We are stuck at the point that I think the schema.xml is syntactically free of errors but now giving an error: Caused by: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Could not load conf for core nwr_col: Can't load sch

Re: Having problem with implicit field "_root_"

Check the attached thread. It might be what you're looking for. On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 4:30 PM Ed Yu wrote: > We have a solr setup from a very old version (1.4) and we are upgrading it > to 8.9. We are stuck at the point that I think the schema.xml is > syntactically free of errors but now givi

Re: Having problem with implicit field "_root_"

Hi, I suggest you define both id and _root_ fields as string, and you populate id with uuid generated by UUIDUpdateProcessor in an updateRequestProcessorChain. See Solr Wiki - https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/uniquekey Dominique Le mar. 31 août 2021 à 22:30, Ed Yu a écrit :