There were some big changes related to child indexing in solr 8.8, under this
ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14923
It's worth updating solr to latest 8.8 and trying again, perhaps your indexing
issue has already been fixed.
On 2021/07/27 19:44:13, Pratik Patel wrote:
> So
Thanks Endika!
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14923
@DavidSmiley do you think this could be related to the issue I have
described?
I will certainly update our solr image but it will be good to know the root
cause of the issue. Your comment on this would be very helpful.
Thanks
On
Hello,
Some documents in my collection have an empty body field.
"body":"",
I am looking for a query to find docs with a body field with this "empty"
value.
Normally, I might run with a filter
fq=-body:*
On this large set of shards that I am querying it times out with the
wildcard. On
Search for *:* -body:*
I do this pretty often.
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
> On Jul 28, 2021, at 8:48 AM, mtn search wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Some documents in my collection have an empty body field.
>"body":"",
>
> I am looking f
This (present/absent) condition is there during the indexing time. So,
apply the optimization at the indexing rather than at the search time.
Have a custom UpdateRequestProcessor chain that will create a boolean
flag that matches "body" presence/absence.
You can do that with copy, default-value a
Same thing is happening to me. Could you please also unsubscribe
car...@rocha.cc
On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 5:26 PM Anshum Gupta wrote:
> Done.
>
> On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 1:36 PM Jagpreet Mahajan <
> jagpreetkhan...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Can the same be done for my email address jagpreetkhan.
Hi, Alex.
I think, first of all, check the log with prop log4j.debug=true. Does solr's
log4j see your jsob layout plugin?
Make shure, that you layout inter solr classpath (in web-inf/lib or
solr/server/ext/lib)
вторник, 27 июля 2021г., 18:27 +03:00 от Alexey Murz Korepov mur...@gmail.com :
>H
Thanks Walter, Alex!
Yes I regularly use - Search for *:* -body:* . With the size of the
Master/Slave deployment and number of shards, in this case the wildcard
query timesout... I plan to add some additional fqs, to narrow the scope.
I do not have an immediate option to change the indexing
I wonder if by adding boolean docvalue to schema, you could use
in-place updates to add that information post-indexing by basically
running batch checks on documents that don't have that new flag at all
and then updating it to be 0/1 to indicate body. The in-place update
would avoid having to reind
Hi Alessandro, Roopa, I created the ticket here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15569 . I don't think I have
permission to add people though, so please tag whomever you feel is
necessary.
Pls let me know if you need any more info, thanks!
On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 1:00 PM Alessandro Bene
Digging out this old thread since I am looking for an answer to the same
question.
To Matthew's response above, since the /replication is an implicit handler,
even if removed from solrconfig.xml, it would still work.
I looked around (aka Googled) to find a way in which someone exploited this
vulner
Thank you, Spyros.
Roopa
On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 3:00 PM Spyros Kapnissis wrote:
> Hi Alessandro, Roopa, I created the ticket here:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15569 . I don't think I have
> permission to add people though, so please tag whomever you feel is
> necessary.
> Pls
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15072?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17389081#comment-17389081
]
Ganesh Raju commented on SOLR-15072:
Any update?
> Support building and testing Solr
On 7/28/2021 11:48 AM, mtn search wrote:
Thanks Walter, Alex!
Yes I regularly use - Search for *:* -body:*
That syntax, while it works for finding docs where the body field is
entirely missing, is not the best option. You'll likely find that this
syntax is MUCH faster, and returns identica
If ‘body’ field is indexed=true, Shawn’s query should give you results
where body=“” as well as where body field doesn’t exist at all.
Also, I agree that the format body:[* TO *] is much faster for high
cardinality fields (which most likely “body” is).
-Rahul
On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 7:46 PM Shawn
Minor edit: *if “body” field is indexed=true AND analyzed (i.e. Some text
type; not of type “string”).
On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 9:53 PM Rahul Goswami wrote:
> If ‘body’ field is indexed=true, Shawn’s query should give you results
> where body=“” as well as where body field doesn’t exist at all.
16 matches
Mail list logo
