I think you are hitting this bug
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12779
Jan
> 29. apr. 2021 kl. 08:51 skrev Ere Maijala :
>
> Hello Markus,
>
> Thanks for the reply. I'm not sure I understand. The docs state the following:
>
> "The default value of mm is 0% (all clauses optional), u
Ah, yes, that seems to be the case. Thanks for the pointer! Also the
discussion is enlightening. It looks like there hasn't been much
happening in that bug so I'll need to consider any other options.
--Ere
Jan Høydahl kirjoitti 29.4.2021 klo 11.48:
I think you are hitting this bug
https://is
I struggled with something very similar today, which turned our search
model upside down as in Solr 8+ edismax uses sow=false by default and it
was true in Solr 6 (where we upgraded from),
but after adding this my handler things were back to normal.
On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 11:45 AM Ere Maijala
wr
Ever since installing 8.6 a couple of months ago, the indexing was working
fine. All of a sudden getting the following error -
4/29/2021, 12:01:59 PM
ERROR false
DocBuilder
Exception while processing: hotels document : SolrInputDocument(fields:
[]):org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.DataImportHand
Thanks for sharing your experience. We've been running sow=false until
now and got away with it as most searches hit a catch-all field. That
won't be the case in the long run anymore, so now I'm contemplating
switching back to sow=true. It's just a bit scary change to do at this
point since it
What happens if you run exactly that SELECT query on your source database?
Charlie
On 29/04/2021 12:08, Anuj Bhargava wrote:
Ever since installing 8.6 a couple of months ago, the indexing was working
fine. All of a sudden getting the following error -
4/29/2021, 12:01:59 PM
ERROR false
DocBuil
This is where having a really nice regression test across a wide variety of
representative queries comes in super helpful, to understand the impact of
changes not just on one query, but across all your queries. See
https://quepid.com/ or https://github.com/SeaseLtd/rated-ranking-evaluator for
Thanks for the pointers. I suppose the first hurdle is to collect the
"wide variety of representative queries". :) But even a small set would
provide some indication of the impact, I think, so it wouldn't hurt to
start using a proper tool for it.
--Ere
Eric Pugh kirjoitti 29.4.2021 klo 14.53:
{ "responseHeader":{ "status":0, "QTime":11, "params":{ "q":"*:*", "_":
"1619701169621"}}, "response":{"numFound":179573,"start":0,"numFoundExact":
true,"docs":[ { "country":["AU"], "date_c":"2019-03-14T18:30:00Z",
On Thu, 29 Apr 2021 at 17:18, Charlie Hull
wrote:
> What happens if you run exact
Saw the following in the logs -
*2021-04-29 11:19:58.330 INFO (main) [ ] o.e.j.s.Server
jetty-9.4.27.v20200227; built: 2020-02-27T18:37:21.340Z; git:
a304fd9f351f337e7c0e2a7c28878dd536149c6c; jvm 1.8.0_292-b10*
*2021-04-29 11:19:58.352 INFO (main) [ ] o.e.j.d.p.ScanningAppProvider
Deployment
It is not fetching
Requests: 1 , Fetched: 0 , Skipped: 0 , Processed: 0
On Thu, 29 Apr 2021 at 18:35, Anuj Bhargava wrote:
> Saw the following in the logs -
>
> *2021-04-29 11:19:58.330 INFO (main) [ ] o.e.j.s.Server
> jetty-9.4.27.v20200227; built: 2020-02-27T18:37:21.340Z; git:
> a304fd9f
That's interesting, it seems like you've indexed a matrix into a field.
If that's the case I think you'll need to access the arrays using the index
as described here:
https://solr.apache.org/guide/8_8/vector-math.html#getting-values-by-index
Then you can create a matrix from the arrays.
I guess
Hello,
I'm trying to follow the Solr Tutorial and need some pointers where I'm
going wrong.
In exercise 3 I cannot import any documents in my localDocs collection,
neither using the example\exampledocs\post.jar helper, nor the File
Upload in the Admin UI. Neither PDF, nor XML, nor plain text
Hi Joel,
Thank you for pointing me to that part of the documentation. valueAt() is
exactly what I needed here.
However, as you point out, there seems to be no way to directly get the
matrix from a multidimensional array.
As a consequence, my streaming expression is very verbose and quite long
for
I agree this is very verbose. I didn't even realize you could index a
multidimensional array into a multi-value field until now. Knowing this it
makes sense to support matrix creation directly from multi-value arrays.
I'll add this when i get some time.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.c
Well, I actually index an array in my field.
But when I use f1=col(s1, feature), it extracts it as a multi-valued field.
I understand that col() is used to extract a field value from multiple
retrieved instances, so it kind of puts it into an array, forming a
multidimensional array.
Could it be po
If you store it as a multi-value double or float, you would in theory just
get the array. It may be the way you are indexing the data rather than
defining the field that is creating the outer array.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 11:06 AM FAVORY , XAVIER
w
I meant can you run it on the database directly, without Solr, and what
happens?
Best
Charlie
On 29/04/2021 14:00, Anuj Bhargava wrote:
{ "responseHeader":{ "status":0, "QTime":11, "params":{ "q":"*:*", "_":
"1619701169621"}}, "response":{"numFound":179573,"start":0,"numFoundExact":
true,"doc
Hello, Can someone share the pros and cons of using SOLR's learning to rank
vs having an external reranker after fetching SOLR's top results. Which
option would you recommend?
Thanks in advance,
Hello,
I am trying to configure Solr authentication using Basic
Authentication and Role Based Authorization. I've been facing issues
configuring the authorization part, while the authentication part
works fine. My goal is to define three groups, containing one user
each. One user (chatbot) should h
Hi -
I am on version Solr 6.6 and using parent and child construct
Query as follows:
[child parentFilter='field1:value1' childFilter='((field1:(value1)) AND
({!terms f=field2}value2))' limit=1]
Here I want to sort this children by field3 and return only the top 1
element (hence limit=1) . Is the
: > I intermittently face this issue sometimes while running the unit tests.
How exactly are you running the tests? ant? IDE? ... It's very strange
that this would be an intermittent problem.
Can you please post the actual log details from the test so we can see the
INFO & WARN level logging
Hi Ecem,
1.a) What do you mean with File Fingerprint? If that is hash of a file, you
should check here:
https://solr.apache.org/guide/8_8/de-duplication.html
1.b) Solr has a limited capability of Machine Learning applications. You
can check the list from here:
https://solr.apache.org/guide/8_8/
Without solr, directly is also working.
Only it is not indexing any longer
On Thu, 29 Apr 2021 at 21:40, Charlie Hull
wrote:
> I meant can you run it on the database directly, without Solr, and what
> happens?
>
> Best
>
> Charlie
>
> On 29/04/2021 14:00, Anuj Bhargava wrote:
> > { "responseHea
24 matches
Mail list logo
