Hi Ronen,
If you think that it is unintentional explicit commit that is causing this, you
can disable explicit commit with IgnoreCommitOptimizeUpdateProcessorFactory.
HTH,
Emir
--
Monitoring - Log Management - Alerting - Anomaly Detection
Solr & Elasticsearch Consulting Support Training - http://
Hello,
On solr v8.7.0 we consistently experience shards with all replicas in DOWN
state after a node restart and shard rebalanceleaders.
During rebalance we stop all /update requests to all shard.
Once this issue happens, we see “No Servers Hosting Shard” error in solr log
and only remedy is t
Hi,
Here's one that I can't wrap my head around. The main question is: why
are the search terms treated differently in eDisMax if the query expands
to a multi-word synonym, and there are different field types and q.op=AND?
This gets complicated quickly, so I tried to reproduce the results wit
Hello Ere,
The q.op parameter is not a dismax parameter. instead i think you are being
bitten bij de mm parameter [1] which by default is 100%, meaning all terms
must match. Multi word synonym handing and mm are not a very intuitive
match, and can lead to crazy problems. Also beware of mm and stop
Thinking a little longer, and remembering the code a little more, I
suspect removing middle collections probably won't actually error (assuming
you actually wanted gaps in your time series and that you don't consider
that an error), but any new data that would have hit the removed collection
it wou
On 2021-04-27 11:07, Ronen Nussbaum wrote:
I'm trying to understand why there are so many "SolrIndexSearcher
Opening"
events in the log e.g.
Those events are all for the realtime searcher, which is normally found
at the /get handler path. I believe that handler is implicit, meaning
you don'
Hi List,
We have a join perfomance issue and are not sure in which direction we should
look to solve the issue.
We currently only have a single node setup
We have 2 collections where we do join querys, joined by a "primary key" string
field contentId_s
Each dataset for a single contentId_s cons
Hi,
I intermittently face this issue sometimes while running the unit tests.
SecureRandom algorithm 'NativePRNG' is in use by your JVM, which is a
potentially blocking algorithm on some environments. Please report the
details of this failure (and your JVM vendor/version) to
solr-u...@lucene.apach
One more thing, -Dtest.solr.allowed.securerandom=NativePRNG doesn't seem
to help and I haven't tried the other option yet.
On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 8:41 PM gnandre wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I intermittently face this issue sometimes while running the unit tests.
>
> SecureRandom algorithm 'NativePRNG' is
Thank you Shawn for your reply.
I didn't notice the "realtime", we do use it in our application workflow.
I tried to reproduce it in a similar environment but when used the /get handler
I only saw this line in the log:
"org.apache.solr.handler.component.RealTimeGetComponent
LOOKUP_SLICE:shard50=.
Hello Markus,
Thanks for the reply. I'm not sure I understand. The docs state the
following:
"The default value of mm is 0% (all clauses optional), unless q.op is
specified as "AND", in which case mm defaults to 100% (all clauses
required)."
(https://solr.apache.org/guide/8_8/the-dismax-que
11 matches
Mail list logo