Hi,
I have a very old Solr installation (VERY old: Solr 1.4.1 running on Ubuntu
12.04) which I would like to upgrade to the latest Solr version 8.8.2 on
Debian Buster.
Will I be able to migrate the index or should I reindex all documents?
Thank you very much!
Bye
That is a really old version. Migration is not possible. Officially, indexes
are compatible across 1 major version change. Even the config files are not
guaranteed to work directly.
Would suggest, create everything from scratch with old files as reference. Then
re-index.
On Apr 21 2021, at 12:3
Hi,
You'll need to reindex.
Upgrade of index is supported from one major version below.
Regards
Puneet
On Wed, 21 Apr, 2021, 12:32 shacky, wrote:
> Hi,
> I have a very old Solr installation (VERY old: Solr 1.4.1 running on Ubuntu
> 12.04) which I would like to upgrade to the latest Solr versi
Thanks.
What about upgrading major to major 1 to 2, 2 to 3, ... , 7 to 8?
Bye
Il giorno mer 21 apr 2021 alle ore 09:25 Puneet Pawaia <
puneet.paw...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
> Hi,
>
> You'll need to reindex.
>
> Upgrade of index is supported from one major version below.
>
> Regards
> Puneet
>
> On
Hi everyone,
this was true for Solr up until 7.x
For 8.x you *need* to reindex.
Am 21.04.21 um 09:24 schrieb Puneet Pawaia:
Hi,
You'll need to reindex.
Upgrade of index is supported from one major version below.
Regards
Puneet
On Wed, 21 Apr, 2021, 12:32 shacky, wrote:
Hi,
I have a ver
Solr 1.4 is very old. There may have been breaking changes in between. Plus
you would need to install each major version and then upgrade. Could be
time consuming.
If you have the data, best would be to reindex.
Regards
Puneet
On Wed, 21 Apr, 2021, 13:02 shacky, wrote:
> Thanks.
> What about up
We did an upgrade from 6 to 8.2 by installing an in-between 7 instance and
then doing a 6 to 7 upgrade and then a 7 to 8 upgrade.
On Wed, 21 Apr, 2021, 13:04 Daniel Exner, wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> this was true for Solr up until 7.x
>
> For 8.x you *need* to reindex.
>
>
> Am 21.04.21 um 09:24
Hi,
"What about upgrading major to major 1 to 2, 2 to 3, ... , 7 to 8?"
I wouldn't recommend this time consuming activity, I am in line with other
comments:
1) design your solution from scratch on Solr 8.x using your 1.4 config as a
reference.
2) re-index (from your data source or worst case scena
Thanks Alessandro.
1) design your solution from scratch on Solr 8.x using your 1.4 config as a
> reference.
>
I cannot change the schema at the moment, but I will be able to reconfigure
Solr 8 from scratch if this is what you mean.
> 2) re-index (from your data source or worst case scenario, e
Hi Russell,
I don't think there's necessarily a magic bullet here, as in one setting
that will solve the performance issues you're seeing. You need to break
down which part of a slow query is costing the most - and as Alessandro
suggests you need to do this carefully, starting with a stripped
Hi all,
I am about to migrate from Solr 1.4 to Solr 8.8 as I described in my
previous message here.
The definitive plan is to also migrate from standalone installation to
SolrCloud with at least 3 nodes up and running (preferable multi-master, or
single master + 2 read only nodes).
I don't wish t
Hi,
Imagine that you have been tasked with designing a Solr-based system that
indexes and queries data aggregated from several relational databases. All the
data items are ultimately related to a common object type, so the logical data
schema looks like :
Customer
Profile
Events
Hi Mathew,
Did you try hl.requireFieldMatch=true; this would force Highlighter to
only generate highlights on matched field's
Thanks,
Abhishek
On Sat, Apr 17, 2021, 13:02 Roth, Matthew wrote:
> Hi List,
>
> I am using 7.7.3 and I have a query where I would like to use the original
> highli
Hi Jae,
You can check Yonik's blog post: https://yonik.com/facet-performance/
Kind Regards,
Furkan KAMACI
On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 6:08 PM Jae Joo wrote:
> For the simple facet by field, is there any performance difference between
> two?
>
> Jae
>
I just went through my “junk email folder” and found lots of responses from a
few days ago. I do not know why my email let some though and filtered others
with the same subject and “from”, but it did.
Thank you for those responses. I was feeling like the community wasn’t that
concerned. I am g
Is there an option in solr 8 where I can rename (alias) a field that is
part of fl= parameter?
So example fl=firstname , it should show the solr results with "name"
instead of "firstname"
--
Thanks & Regards,
Yaswanth Kumar Konathala.
yaswanth...@gmail.com
Yes, if you are using eDismax, including expanding alias to multiple
fields internally:
https://solr.apache.org/guide/8_8/the-extended-dismax-query-parser.html#field-aliasing-using-per-field-qf-overrides
f.name.qf=last_name first_name
Another example:
https://github.com/arafalov/solr-indexing-boo
Hi,
I have a field value as bim.ClassUnderlying and a search query as
classunderlying does not return any results. If I search for
classUnderlying, it works.What can I change so that it works for
classunderlying query too? If I change splitOnCaseChange value from 1 to 0
in index time analyzer chai
to subscribe Announcements of apache solr releases
Best Regards,
Basheer K
19 matches
Mail list logo
