I just wanted to give an update on this. I rebuilt the index using
storeOffsetsWithPositions=true for the relevant highlight fields,
and I did see the size of the index increase, but I didn't see any
significant improvement in query response time.
Thank you,
maria
On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 9:46 AM
Thank you for your suggestions. I did read the reference guide and tried
everything that I thought might help.
I am using hl.method=unified and I do not have wildcards in my query, BUT I
did not try storeOffsetsWithPositions=true.
I will try this and see how it goes
Thank you again,
Maria
On Thu
Hi Maria,
Did you read the reference guide?:
https://solr.apache.org/guide/8_11/highlighting.html#schema-options-and-performance-considerations
In particular, you're going to get the best performance with
hl.method=unified and storeOffsetsWithPositions=true. I wouldn't
bother with termPositions o
Hi,
I am having trouble with highlighting being very slow. I tried all
suggestions that I could find online, but it is still much slower than I
would like it to be.
This happens on multi-valued fields that can sometimes have ~2-3M values of
~200 characters each value.
I am using hl.method=unifie
