Re: Solr 9 and the Affinity placement plugin

2022-10-24 Thread Maxbone
ram.com/themaxbone> From: Jonathan Tan Sent: Monday, October 24, 2022 3:24 PM To: users@solr.apache.org Subject: Re: Solr 9 and the Affinity placement plugin For anybody else who comes across this, for easy access, here's the wiki page where this was first discussed: https://c

Re: Solr 9 and the Affinity placement plugin

2022-10-24 Thread Jonathan Tan
For anybody else who comes across this, for easy access, here's the wiki page where this was first discussed: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SOLR/SIP-8+Autoscaling+policy+engine+V2 And here's the issue where the implementations were discussed: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOL

Re: Solr 9 and the Affinity placement plugin

2022-10-20 Thread Houston Putman
I agree with Jan. Though I have seen this exact usage multiple times, so it will likely be beneficial to the community. - Houston On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 3:34 AM Jan Høydahl wrote: > Hi, > > In Solr 9 the focus is on a rich Java API that will allow you to create > your own placement plugin that

Re: Solr 9 and the Affinity placement plugin

2022-10-13 Thread Jan Høydahl
Hi, In Solr 9 the focus is on a rich Java API that will allow you to create your own placement plugin that can do pretty much anything. The affinity plugin tries to give a good OOTB experience for most use cases, but does not aim to be the one everyone uses. You may want to fork the affinity plu

Solr 9 and the Affinity placement plugin

2022-10-12 Thread Jonathan Tan
Hi! In Solr 8.6, I used the autoscaling configuration to set it up so that we had 2 `nodeTypes`, one for indexing, the other for querying. And our collections were set up to be TLOG + PULL replicas only, and we'd use the autoscaling to place the TLOG on the indexing nodeTypes, and the PULL on the