Re: Zookeeper and Solr and CVE-2021-44228

2021-12-15 Thread Jan Høydahl
To unsubscribe, see https://solr.apache.org/community.html#mailing-lists-chat Jan > 15. des. 2021 kl. 04:30 skrev John Eberly : > > unsubscribe > > > On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 8:53 AM Walter Underwood > wrote: > >> Zookeeper 3.5.7 uses log4j 1.x, so is not vulnerable. I checked. >> >> wunder

Re: Zookeeper and Solr and CVE-2021-44228

2021-12-14 Thread John Eberly
unsubscribe On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 8:53 AM Walter Underwood wrote: > Zookeeper 3.5.7 uses log4j 1.x, so is not vulnerable. I checked. > > wunder > Walter Underwood > wun...@wunderwood.org > http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog) > > > On Dec 13, 2021, at 6:20 AM, Michael Conrad wrote: > >

Re: Zookeeper and Solr and CVE-2021-44228

2021-12-13 Thread Walter Underwood
Zookeeper 3.5.7 uses log4j 1.x, so is not vulnerable. I checked. wunder Walter Underwood wun...@wunderwood.org http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog) > On Dec 13, 2021, at 6:20 AM, Michael Conrad wrote: > > I presume this also needs fixing for zookeeper nodes? > > On 12/10/21 13:44, Walter

Re: Zookeeper and Solr and CVE-2021-44228

2021-12-13 Thread Andy C
Zookeeper has not yet migrated to log4j2. Even their latest releases (3.6.3, 3.7.0) are still using version 1.2.17 of log4j. So I would think that Zookeeper would be in the same situation as the pre-7.4.0 Solr releases as described here: https://solr.apache.org/security.html#apache-solr-affected-b

Re: Zookeeper and Solr and CVE-2021-44228

2021-12-13 Thread Andy Lester
> On Dec 13, 2021, at 8:20 AM, Michael Conrad wrote: > > I presume this also needs fixing for zookeeper nodes? Anything that logs with log4j.