Re: Solr and CVE-2021-44228

2021-12-11 Thread Bram Van Dam
In case anyone wants to patch 7.7.3 from source, here's a patch and quick build instructions: Apply the attached patch -- hopefully the mailing list won't nerf the attachment. git am < /path/to/CVE-2021-4422.txt ant clean compile jar -Dversion=7.7.3 cd solr ant package -Dversion=7.7.3 - Br

Re: Solr and CVE-2021-44228

2021-12-10 Thread Mike Drob
Thanks again! I also added more detail on the impact to log4j 1 to the announcement text On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 4:32 PM Andy C wrote: > Mike, > > I see that the "Versions Affected" statement has been updated, but further > down it still states "Apache Solr releases prior to 7.0 (i.e. all Solr

Re: Solr and CVE-2021-44228

2021-12-10 Thread Andy C
Mike, I see that the "Versions Affected" statement has been updated, but further down it still states "Apache Solr releases prior to 7.0 (i.e. all Solr 5 and Solr 6 releases) use log4j 1.2.17". 7.0 should be updated to 7.4. - Andy - On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 5:10 PM Mike Drob wrote: > Andy - yo

Re: Solr and CVE-2021-44228

2021-12-10 Thread Mike Drob
Andy - you are correct, we will update the notice on the site. Thank you for checking the details. On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 4:08 PM Andy C wrote: > The statement on the https://solr.apache.org/security.html page states > that > all 7.X and all 8.X versions are vulnerable, however looking at my 7.

Re: Solr and CVE-2021-44228

2021-12-10 Thread Andy C
The statement on the https://solr.apache.org/security.html page states that all 7.X and all 8.X versions are vulnerable, however looking at my 7.3.1 Solr instance I am still finding the 1.2.17 version of the log4j jar. I found https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7887 which indicates that th

Re: Solr and CVE-2021-44228

2021-12-10 Thread mtn search
Thanks again Mike! Do you perhaps have an example of a lookup capable appender for log4j v1.2? I have only found lookups for 2.x https://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/manual/lookups.html. I am only using two types of appenders for v1.2: org.apache.log4j.ConsoleAppender org.apache.log4j.

Re: Solr and CVE-2021-44228

2021-12-10 Thread Mike Drob
If you are opting in to using a lookup capable appender then you are vulnerable. I don’t have a POC for testing it, but generally you’d only be affected if you’re using this functionality explicitly On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 3:21 PM mtn search wrote: > Thanks for the information Mike! > > I notice

Re: Solr and CVE-2021-44228

2021-12-10 Thread Richard Frovarp
Unless other attack vectors are found, which are now noted in that same section if you are running through Tomcat. On 12/10/21 2:22 PM, Rahul Goswami wrote: In addition to the mitigation strategies mentioned on the Solr page, the below blog post indicates that you should be protected if you are

Re: Solr and CVE-2021-44228

2021-12-10 Thread mtn search
Thanks for the information Mike! I noticed that on https://solr.apache.org/security.html it lists the following statement for Solr releases prior to 7: Apache Solr releases prior to 7.0 (i.e. all Solr 5 and Solr 6 releases) use log4j 1.2.17 which may be vulnerable for installations using non-defa

Re: Solr and CVE-2021-44228

2021-12-10 Thread Rahul Goswami
In addition to the mitigation strategies mentioned on the Solr page, the below blog post indicates that you should be protected if you are using Java 11.0.1 and up https://www.lunasec.io/docs/blog/log4j-zero-day/ On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 3:07 PM Mike Drob wrote: > Solr is affected. Please see th

Re: Solr and CVE-2021-44228

2021-12-10 Thread Mike Drob
Solr is affected. Please see the statement at the https://solr.apache.org/security.html page On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 12:44 PM Walter Underwood wrote: > Does all Solr logging go through slf4j? If so, that should protect against > this vulnerability. > > If not, who has tested Solr with log4j 2.15