Re: Log4J saga (CVE-2021-45046)

2021-12-15 Thread Shawn Heisey
On 12/15/21 11:53 AM, Scott Derrick wrote: I find these files in my solr install ./server/lib/ext/log4j-core-2.11.0.jar ./server/lib/ext/log4j-1.2-api-2.11.0.jar ./server/lib/ext/log4j-api-2.11.0.jar ./server/lib/ext/log4j-slf4j-impl-2.11.0.jar ./contrib/prometheus-exporter/lib/log4j-core-2.11.0

Re: Log4J saga (CVE-2021-45046)

2021-12-15 Thread Mike Drob
That should be sufficient based on our current understanding of the situation, yes. On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 12:53 PM Scott Derrick wrote: > I find these files in my solr install > > ./server/lib/ext/log4j-core-2.11.0.jar > ./server/lib/ext/log4j-1.2-api-2.11.0.jar > ./server/lib/ext/log4j-api-2.

Re: Log4J saga (CVE-2021-45046)

2021-12-15 Thread Walter Underwood
That is fixed in log4j 2.16.0, included in Solr 8.11.1. wunder Walter Underwood wun...@wunderwood.org http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog) > On Dec 15, 2021, at 4:40 AM, e_bri...@videotron.ca wrote: > > Hi all, > > Looks like we are not done with log4j security problems. Someone has > re

Re: Log4J saga (CVE-2021-45046)

2021-12-15 Thread Thomas Corthals
Keep in mind that you can have more than one log4j-core-*.jar to patch. In my case: /opt/solr-8.4.0/server/lib/ext/log4j-core-2.11.2.jar /opt/solr-8.4.0/contrib/prometheus-exporter/lib/log4j-core-2.11.2.jar Thomas Op wo 15 dec. 2021 om 13:52 schreef Bernd Fehling < bernd.fehl...@uni-bielefeld.de

Re: Log4J saga (CVE-2021-45046)

2021-12-15 Thread Andy Lester
> > Is there already an Idea when 8.11.1 is supposed to be released ? This was discussed yesterday. Check the archives for the full explanation. Short version: can’t give a definite date but it will be no sooner than a week from now.

Re: Log4J saga (CVE-2021-45046)

2021-12-15 Thread Rahul Goswami
We just upgraded to log4j2-2.16. It disables jndi lookups altogether by default. -Rahul On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 7:40 AM wrote: > Hi all, > > Looks like we are not done with log4j security problems. Someone has > recommendations about CVE-2021-45046? > > Eric Briere >

Re: Log4J saga (CVE-2021-45046)

2021-12-15 Thread Bernd Fehling
Isn't the example with "zip -q -d ..." as reported in the CVE not working for you? Regards Bernd Am 15.12.21 um 13:40 schrieb e_bri...@videotron.ca: Hi all, Looks like we are not done with log4j security problems. Someone has recommendations about CVE-2021-45046? Eric Briere