On 3/16/23 02:24, Björn Häuser wrote:
1.) Are these equivalent field definitions?
Old:
Replying to the initial email rather than the reply from Tomás, because
that reply did not maintain the headers for threading.
The precisionStep setting is something intrinsic to Trie types and is
not s
Hi Björn,
>
> 1.) Are these equivalent field definitions?
>
> Old:
>
> positionIncrementGap="0”/>
>
> New:
>
>
> 2.) Do we need to reindex after the scheme change?
>
> We have a large collections and are serving requests 24/7. Is a full index
> required or is Solr/Lucene able to handle both fiel
Not a dissimilar issue, I'm receiving "Field type 'solr.TextField' not
found" when I try
curl --request POST \
--url http://localhost:8983/api/collections/minervasus/schema \
--header 'Content-Type: application/json' \
--data '{
"add-field": [
{"name": "tester", "type": "solr.LongPoint
Hello Solr users,
We are currently in the process of moving from Trie* classes away and are
having some questions how todo the migration.
During that we are having some questions, where we cannot find an answer in the
documentation.
1.) Are these equivalent field definitions?
Old: