The run-time type of a value

y be assigned some kind of text type as a fallback. The documentation for addField() says: " Add a field value to any existing values that may or may not exist. The class type of value and the name parameter should match schema. xml. schema. xml can be found in conf directory under the solr hom

Re: Programmatically creating a collection with a schema

a factory), and any other files > referenced by those two configs.  You can't just upload the schema, you > must also have the solrconfig. > > https://solr.apache.org/guide/solr/latest/configuration-guide/configsets-api.html > > Each configset stored in ZK has a name, a

Re: Programmatically creating a collection with a schema

I should have to specify that information at all: That seems like something that should be up to the administrator of the solr server(s). > While I agree that an easy button for uploading a complete schema.xml > could be convenient in some cases, I don't know if it's that simple to

Programmatically creating a collection with a schema

but otherwise all administrative information (like the number of shards, replicas, other installation-specific information that I can't know as an application) should be left to the Solr administrator. There also doesn't appear to be a way to "just" set the schema for a ConfigSet. What am I missing? -- Mark Raynsford | https://www.io7m.com

Always SolrCloud mode?

Hello! I'm pretty new to Solr and installed it in standalone mode. I notice that in SolrCloud mode, the server exposes a different set of APIs that seem to allow for creating search indexes in a much less painful way than manually creating cores with configuration files. I'm specifical

Re: Ignore unknown fields when indexing PDFs - thanks to wunder

Walter Underwood, thanks for this clear description of the PDF world - I love it! Walter Claassen Von:"Walter Underwood" An: users@solr.apache.org Datum: 04.06.2024 18:20 Betreff:Re: Ignore unknown fields when indexing PDFs PDFs don’t have fields. PDFs are instructions for

Re: Re: (Gen)AI-Support for searching with Solr/Lucene

l-augmented_generation ? -- Koji --- Matthias Krüger 25.04.2024 09:35 Hallo Walter, es gibt viele dieser Startups zur Zeit, wenn Du konkrete Fragen oder Ideen zu Retrieval-Augmented-Generation-Ansätzen und Architekturen mit Solr hast, können wir gern mal sprech

(Gen)AI-Support for searching with Solr/Lucene

Hi all, is anybody already using AI to support searching with Solr/Lucene? I just had an interesting demo from a german start-up. I gave them plain text data, which I usually feed into Solr, and they did some AI magic with these data, so that we could ask human-language-questions and got human

Solr Operator Tutorial

I went through the tutorial documented at https://apache.github.io/solr-operator/docs/local_tutorial and the solr instances would not start. I saw that there was an error parsing solr.xml on the field "allowPaths" so decided to try version 8.7 since it looks like this was introduced in

Retry strategy in Solrj 8

When using CloudSolrClient builder, the default HttpClient appears to be created with 3 retries. However, it looks like BaseCloudSolrClient already retries 5 times so we end up with retries on top of retries. Is there a reason to keep both of these retries configured or is it safe to disable the

highlighting section nearly empty

Hi all, I'm running Solr 9.1.1 on Windows 10 Pro. Search is fine, but the highlighting section at the end of the results does only show the documents UID. I search for 'penke' and the string 'penke' should be marked for highlighting. Any idea on this? Best, Walter C

Re: Re: Solr @ Windows 10: how to delete an index

Jan & Shawn, thank you for your quick response. I used (and shall use) Jan's proposal to form Admin UI "Documents" screen. Walter "Jan Høydahl" schrieb am 20.03.2023 19:03:48: Von: "Jan Høydahl" An: users@solr.apache.org Datum: 20.03.2023 19:05

Re: Re: Solr @ Windows 10: how to delete an index

Jan & Shawn, thank you for your quick response. I used (and shall use) Jan's proposal to form Admin UI "Documents" screen. Walter "Jan Høydahl" schrieb am 20.03.2023 19:03:48: > Von: "Jan Høydahl" > An: users@solr.apache.org > Datum: 20.03.202

Solr @ Windows 10: how to delete an index

Hi all, I have to run a Solr project on a Windows 10 PC. Everything went fine. But now I have to delete an existing index, and neither the *ix command nor some "googled" Windows commands work. This works fine on *ix: curl 'http://localhost:8983/solr/my_core/update?

Re: Re: Error CREATEing SolrCore caused by solr.XSLTResponseWriter

Thank you, Markus, disabled the XSLT response writer (and 2 following "troublemakers") in the solrconfig.xml, and the core was successfully created. Walter Von:"Markus Jelsma" An: users@solr.apache.org Kopie: solr-u...@lucene.apache.org Datum: 11.0

Bug in copyfield when using maxChars (SOLR 9)

Hi We’ve stumbled upon something that seems like a bug. The behaviour is changed since solr 8.11 If we setup copyfield with maxChars, this is “remembered” for all other copyField-operations (at least for the same source field). From schema.xml: Input doc: body:“On a brighter note, they

Re: solr 9 standalone crashed after few hours - PhaseIdealLoop::build_loop_late_post_work

> On 16 Oct 2022, at 22:08, Shawn Heisey wrote: > > On 10/13/22 14:42, solr wrote: >> Hi - both our examples from the previous posting seems to be related to >> compiling: com.github.benmanes.caffeine.cache.BoundedLocalCache: > > The original message tal

Re: solr 9 standalone crashed after few hours - PhaseIdealLoop::build_loop_late_post_work

> On 13 Oct 2022, at 21:00, Wei wrote: > > Do we know which lucene/solr component would trigger this error? > > Regards, > Wei Hi - both our examples from the previous posting seems to be related to compiling: com.github.benmanes.caffeine.cache.BoundedLocalCache: 1.

Re: solr 9 standalone crashed after few hours - PhaseIdealLoop::build_loop_late_post_work

(bellsoft/liberica-openjdk-debian:17), with the same result (even though the actual error differed somewhat (optimize instead of build_loop_late_post_work)). For now we ended up with building a docker image of solr 9.0.0 based on openjdk:11-jre and it has been running several hours without crashes

Solr 8.6 - combine facets on multivalued dateRange field with exclude tags, negate and OR clause

Hi all, On Solr 8.6, I have a multivalued field of dateRange type which contains an availability table. "availabilities": [ "[2021-12-22T00:00:00Z TO 2022-01-02T23:59:59Z]", "[2022-01-20T00:00:00Z TO 2022-02-02T23:59:59Z]", "[2022-02-10T00:00:00Z TO 202

Solr 8.6 - combine facets on multivalued dateRange field with exclude tags, negate and OR clause

Hi all, On Solr 8.6, I have a multivalued field of dateRange type which contains an availability table. "availabilities": [ "[2021-12-22T00:00:00Z TO 2022-01-02T23:59:59Z]", "[2022-01-20T00:00:00Z TO 2022-02-02T23:59:59Z]", "[2022-02-10T00:00:00Z TO 202

Re: Phonetic search

nough. You don't need BeiderMorseFilterFactory. p.s. I'm not a German speaker and I haven't actually tested the above claim. I'm just speculating. On 6/28/21 7:25 AM, Christian Havel wrote: Hi, I am using Solr 8.8.1 and want to use the Phonetic Search option. Because of this I

Leading Wildcard Performance

Hello everyone, We've recently started seeing a huge query time performance degradation with the use of the leading wildcard queries when we migrated from Solr 7.7.1 to Solr 8.6.3. The average response time was around 300 ms before the upgrade while around 600 ms after the upgrade. We hav